食品与营养科学  >> Vol. 2 No. 1 (February 2013)

基于BDM实验拍卖法的消费者对不同信息层次可追溯猪肉的支付意愿:江苏无锡市的案例
The Willingness to Pay for the Pork with Different Information of Traceability Based on BDM Experimental Auction: The Case of Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province

DOI: 10.12677/HJFNS.2013.21002, PDF, HTML, XML,  被引量 下载: 3,165  浏览: 11,473  国家自然科学基金支持

作者: 蔡 杰, 朱 淀:苏州大学商学院,苏州;王红纱, 吴林海:江南大学江苏省食品安全研究基地,无锡

关键词: 可追溯猪肉不同信息层次支付意愿实验拍卖法江苏无锡市 Traceability Pork; Different Levels of the Information; Willingness to Pay; Experimental Auction; Wuxi City Jiangsu Province

摘要:

本文以江苏省无锡市131名消费者为对象,采用BDM实验拍卖法研究消费者对不同信息层次可追溯猪肉的支付意愿。研究结论表明:女性、年轻、高学历、对可追溯食品的认知程度越高则对高层次的可追溯猪肉具有更高的偏好。生产不同类型的可追溯猪肉以满足市场需求,既是对生产者提出的客观要求,也是食品工业结构转型的需要,更能保障食品安全。

Abstract: By using the BDM experimental auction, this paper researches consumers’ willingness to pay for the pork with different information of traceability. The data was collected from 131 consumers of Wuxi, Jiangsu Province. The conclusion indicates that: female, young, well-educated and better familiarities with the traceability food, the WTP to the high level of the traceability food are higher. To produce different kinds of the traceability pork in order to meet market demand is not only the objective requirements for the producers, but also the demand of the food industry structural transformation.

文章引用: 蔡杰, 王红纱, 朱淀, 吴林海. 基于BDM实验拍卖法的消费者对不同信息层次可追溯猪肉的支付意愿:江苏无锡市的案例[J]. 食品与营养科学, 2013, 2(1): 6-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/HJFNS.2013.21002

参考文献

[1] Y. Sarig. Traceability of food products. Agricultural Engineering International, 2003, 12: 2-17.
[2] 吴林海, 徐玲玲, 王晓莉. 影响消费者对可追溯食品额外价格支付意愿与支付水平的主要因素——基于Logistic, Interval Censored的回归分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2010, 4: 77-86.
[3] Y. Sarig. Traceability of food products. International Commission of Agricultural Engineering, 2003, 5: 2-17.
[4] A. Regattieri, M. Gamberi and R. Manzini. Traceability of food products: General framework and experimental evidence. Jour- nal of Food Engineering, 2007, 81(2): 347-356.
[5] L. U. Opara. Traceability in agriculture and food supply chain: A review of basic concepts, technological implications, and future prospects. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 2003, 1(1): 101-106.
[6] J. E. Hobbs. Information asymmetry and the role of traceability systems. Agribusiness: An International Journal, 2004, 20(4): 397-415.
[7] W. Verbeke. The emerging role of traceability and information in demand-oriented livestock production. Outlook on Agriculture, 2001, 30(4): 249-255.
[8] W. Van Rijswijk, L. J. Frewer, D. Menozzi and G. Faioli. Consumer perceptions of traceability: A cross-national comparison of the associated benefits. Food Quality and Preference, 2008, 19(5): 452-464.
[9] T. Glynn, T. Tonsor and C. Schroeder. Livestock identification: Lessons for the US beef industry from the Australian system. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 2006, 18(3-4): 103-118.
[10] E. B. Golan, F. Krissoff, K. Kuchler, G. P. Nelson and L. Calvin. Traceability in the US food supply: Economic theory and industry studies, Washington DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Agricultural Economic Report, 2004: 830.
[11] A. M. Angulo, J. M. Gil and and L. Tamburo. Food safety and consumers’ willingness to pay for labelled Beef in Spain. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 2005, 11(3): 89-105.
[12] M. H. Tsai, F. J. Chang, L. S. Kao and C. C. Chang. An application of composite utility evaluation model for irrigation project. Journal of Chinese Agricultural En-gineering, 2004, 2: 112-123.
[13] J. L. Lusk, J. Roosen and J. A. Fox. Demand for beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn: A comparison of consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2003, 1: 16-29.
[14] 张志强, 徐中民, 程国栋. 条件价值评估法的发展与应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(3): 454-463.
[15] D. L. Dickinson, D. V. Bailey. Meat traceability: Are US consu- mers willing to pay for it? Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2002, 27(2): 348-364.
[16] J. E. Hobbs, D. Bailey, D. L. Dickinson and M. Haghiri. Trace- ability in the Canadian red meat sector: Do consumers care? Cana- dian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2005, 53(1): 47-65.
[17] 王怀明, 尼楚君, 徐锐钊. 消费者对食品质量安全标识支付意愿实证研究——以南京市猪肉消费为例[J]. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2011, 11(1): 21-29.
[18] J. E. Hobbs. A transaction cost analysis of quality, traceability and animal welfare issues in UK beef retailing. British Food Journal, 1996, 6(1): 16-26.
[19] D. Sparling, S. Henson, S. Dessureault and D. Herath. Costs and benefits of traceability in the Canadian dairy-processing sector. Journal of Food Distribution Research Distribution Research, 2006, 1: 154-160.
[20] 马从国, 赵德安, 刘叶飞, 倪军, 张玉峰. 猪肉工厂化生产的全程监控与可溯源系统研制[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(9): 121-125.
[21] G. M. Becker, M. H. DeGroot and J. Marschak. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 1964, 9: 226-232.
[22] 朱淀, 蔡杰. 实验拍卖理论在食品安全研究领域中的应用: 一个文献综述[J]. 江南大学学报: 人文社会科学版, 2012, 1(11): 126-131.
[23] C. Noussair, S. Robin and B. Ruffieux. Do consumers really refuse to buy genetically modified food? The Economic Journal, 2004, 114(492): 102-120.