宇宙学原理检验研究概述
A Brief Review on the Research of Testing of Cosmological Principle
DOI: 10.12677/AAS.2022.104004, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 唐宇航, 杨术银：西华师范大学物理与天文学院，四川 南充；中国科学院新疆天文台，新疆 乌鲁木齐；沙艾德•艾力, 杨晓峰*：中国科学院新疆天文台，新疆 乌鲁木齐；新疆大学物理科学与技术学院，新疆 乌鲁木齐；刘雄伟：西华师范大学物理与天文学院，四川 南充
关键词: 宇宙学原理；标准宇宙学模型；各向异性；Cosmological Principle； Standard Cosmological Model； Anisotropy
摘要: 本文简要介绍了宇宙学原理检验的相关工作。首先介绍了几种宇宙学模型，接着简单地描述了目前宇宙学中仍待解决的一些反常发现。由于这些反常发现，宇宙学原理假设似乎并非一定是正确的。于是研究者们采用了不同的方法和数据对宇宙学原理进行了检验，在相关研究中大多数结果是支持宇宙学原理假设的，然而在一些数据中发现了可能违背宇宙学原理的反常信号，这些反常信号的出现似乎意味着宇宙存在一个特殊的膨胀方向。此外，大尺度结构的反常发现似乎也暗示宇宙有也可能是非均匀的。迄今为止，人们还没有发现确凿和明显违背宇宙学原理的证据。
Abstract: This paper presents a brief introduction on the research of testing of cosmological principles. Firstly, we introduce several cosmological models, and then we simply describe cosmological anomalies which need to be solved in the future. The Cosmological Principle hypothesis seems to be not exactly correct because of these anomalies, thus, researchers employed different methods and data to test the Cosmological Principle. Most of the results supported the hypothesis of the Cosmological Principles. However, few anomalous signals are found in some works that may violate the Cosmological Principles. The emergence of the abnormal signal means that the universe has a preferred expansion direction. Moreover, the abnormal discovery of large-scale structures implies that the universe may be inhomogeneity. Up to now, there is no acceptable and clear evidence for violation of Cosmo-logical Principle.
文章引用：唐宇航, 杨术银, 沙艾德•艾力, 杨晓峰, 刘雄伟. 宇宙学原理检验研究概述[J]. 天文与天体物理, 2022, 10(4): 37-52. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAS.2022.104004

参考文献

[1] Riess, A.G., Filippenko, A.V., et al. (1998) Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. The Astronomical Journal, 116, 1009-1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Bahall, N., Ostriker, J.P., Perlmutter, S. and Steinhardt, P.J. (1999) The Cosmic Triangle: Revealing the State of the Universe. Science, 284, 1481-1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Gold-haber, G., et al. (1999) Measurements of Ω and λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernova. The Astrophysical Journal, 517, 565-586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Nishizawa, A., Taruya, A. and Kawamura, S. (2010) Cosmological Test of Gravity with Polarizations of Stochastic Gravitational Waves around 0.1-1 Hz. Physical Review D, 81, Article ID: 104043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Komatsu, E., Smith, K.M., et al. (2011) Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation. The Astrophysical Journal Supple-ment Series, 192, Article No. 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Ade, P.A.R, Aghanim, N., Amaud, M., et al. (2014) Planck 2013 Results. I. Overview of Products and Scientific Results. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 57l, Article No. A1.
[7] Blake, C. and Wall, J. (2002) A Velocity Dipole in the Distribution of Radio Galaxies. Nature, 416, 150-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Marinoni, C., Bel, J. and Buzzi, A. (2012) The Scale of Cosmic Isotropy. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 10, Article No. 036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Appleby, S. and Shafieloo, A. (2014) Testing Isotropy in the Local Universe. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 10, Article No. 070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Pandey, B. and Sarkar, S. (2015) Testing homogeneity in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release Twelve with Shannon entropy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Socie-ty, 454, 2647-2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Webb, J.K. et al. (1999) A Search for Time Variation of the Fine Structure Constant. Physical Review Letters, 82, 884-887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Wei, H. (2009) Varying Alpha Driven by the Dirac-Born-Infeld Scalar Field. Physics Letters B, 682, 98-104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Barrow, J.D. (2010) Varying Alpha. Annals of Physics, 19, 202-210.
[14] Wei, H., Zou, X.-B., Li, H.-Y. and Xue, D.-Z. (2017) Cosmological Constant, Fine Structure Constant and beyond. The European Physical Journal C, 77, Article No. 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Larson, D., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., et al. (2011) Sev-en-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Power Spectra and WMAP-Derived Parameters. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 192, Article No. 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Bennett, C.L., Larson, D., Weiland, J.L., et al. (2013) Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 208, Article No. 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Hutsemékers, D., Cabanac, R., Lamy, H. and Sluse, D. (2005) Mapping Extreme-Scale Alignments of Quasar Polarization Vectors. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 441, 915-930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Bonvin, C., Durrer, R. and Kunz, M. (2006) Dipole of the Lu-minosity Distance: A Direct Measure of H(z). Physical Review Letters, 96, Article ID: 191302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Singal, A.K. (2015) A Large Anisotropy in the Sky Distribu-tion of 3crr Quasars and Other Radio Galaxies. Astrophysics and Space Science, 357, Article No. 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] Bengaly, C.A.P., Maartens, R. and Santos, M.G.(2018) Probing the Cosmological Principle in the Counts of Radio Galaxies at Different Frequencies. Journal of Cosmology and Astro-particle Physics, 1804, Article No. 031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Balázs, L.G., et al. (2015) A Giant Ring-Like Structure at 0.78 < z < 0.86 Displayed by GRBs. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 452, 2236-2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Clowes, R.G., et al. (2013) A Structure in the Early Universe at z ∼ 1.3 That Exceeds the Homogeneity Scale of the R-W Concordance Cosmology. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 429, 2910-2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] Ade, P.A.R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., et al. (2016) Planck 2015 Re-sults XIII. Cosmological Parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594, Article No. A13.
[24] Albrecht, A. and Stein-bardt, P.J. (1982) Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking. Physical Review Letters, 48, 1220-1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] 俞允强. 物理宇宙学讲义[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2002.
[26] Penzias, A.A. and Wilson, R.W. (1965) A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s. The Astrophysical Journal, 142, 419-421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[27] Enqvist, K. (2008) Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi Model and Accelerating Expansion. General Relativity and Gravitation, 40, 451-466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] Caldwell, R.R. and Stebbins, A. (2008) A Test of the Copernican Principle. Physical Review Letters, 100, Article ID: 191302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[29] Li, S.-L., Feng, X.-H., Wei, H. and Lü, H. (2017) Godel Universe from String Theory. The European Physical Journal C, 77, Article No. 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[30] Batakis, N.A. (1995) Bianchi-Type String Cosmology. Phys-ics Letters B, 353, 39-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[31] Dicke, R.H., Peebles, P.J., Roll, P.G. and Wilkinson, D.T. (1965) Cosmic Black-Body Radiation. The Astrophysical Journal, 142, 414-419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[32] Cruz, M., Vielva, P., Martínez-González, E. and Barreiro, R.B. (2011) Anom-alous Variance in the WMAP Data and Galactic Foreground Residuals. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 412, 2383-2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] Ade, P.A.R., et al. (2014) Planck 2013 Results. XXIII. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 571, Article No. A23.
[34] Hansen, F.K. et al. (2009) Power Asymmetry in Cosmic Microwave Background Fluctuations from Full Sky toSub-Degree Scales: Is the Universe Isotropic? The Astrophysical Journal, 704, 1448-1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[35] Axelsson, M., et al. (2013) Directional Dependence of ΛCDM Cosmological Parameters. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 773, Article No. L3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[36] Mukherjee, S. and Wandelt, B.D. (2018) Making Maps of Cos-mological Parameters. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2018, Article No. 042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[37] Fosalba, P. and Gaztañaga, E. (2021) Explaining Cosmologi-cal Anisotropy: Evidence for Causal Horizons from CMB Data. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 504, 5840-5862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[38] Sandage, A.R. (1970) Cosmology: A Search for Two Numbers. Physics Today, 23, 34-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[39] Krishnan, C., Colgáin, E.Ó., Sheikh-Jabbari, M.M. and Yang, T. (2021) Running Hubble Tension and a H0 Diagnostic. Physical Review D, 103, Article ID: 103509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[40] McClure, M.L. and Dyer, C.C. (2007) Anisotropy in the Hub-ble Constant as Observed in the HST Extragalactic Distance Scale Key Project Results. New Astronomy, 12, 533-543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[41] Migkas, K., et al. (2020) Probing Cosmic Isotropy with a New X-Ray Galaxy Cluster Sample through the LX-T Scaling Relation. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 636, Article No. A15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[42] Migkas, K., et al. (2021) Cosmological Implications of the An-isotropy of Ten Galaxy Cluster Scaling Relations. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 649, Article No. A151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[43] Scolnic, D.M., et al. (2018) The Complete Light-Curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe IA From Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints From the Combined Pan-theon Sample. The Astrophysical Journal, 859, Article No. 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[44] Krishnan, C., Mohayaee, R., Colgáin, E.Ó., Sheikh-Jabbari, M.M. and Yin, L. (2022) Hints of FLRW Breakdown from Supernovae. Physical Review D, 105, Article ID: 063514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[45] Finelli, F., Gruppuso, A., Paci, F. and Starobinsky, A.A. (2012) Searching for Hidden Mirror Symmetries in CMB Fluctuations from WMAP 7 Year Maps. Journal of Cosmolo-gy and Astroparticle Physics, 2012, Article No. 049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[46] Aluri, P.K. and Jain, P. (2012) Parity Asymmetry in the CMB Temperature Power Spectrum. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 419, 3378-3392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[47] Ade, P.A.R., et al. (2016) Planck 2015 Results. XVI. Isot-ropy and Statistics of the CMB. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594, Article No. A16.
[48] Gruppuso, A., et al. (2011) New Constraints on Parity Symmetry from a Re-Analysis of the WMAP-7 Low-Resolution Power Spectra. Monthly No-tices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 411, 1445-1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[49] Ade, P.A.R., et al. (2020) Planck 2018 Results. VII. Isot-ropy and Statistics of the CMB. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, Article No. A7.
[50] Philcox, O.H.E. (2022) Probing Parity-Violation with the Four-Point Correlation Function of BOSS Galaxies. Physical Review D, 106, Article ID: 063501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[51] Yadav, J.K., Bagla, J.S. and Khandai, N. (2010) Fractal Dimension as a Measure of the Scale of Homogeneity. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 405, 2009-2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[52] Geller, M.J. and Huchra, J.P. (1989) Mapping the Universe. Science, 246, 897-903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[53] Gott III, J.R., Jurić, M., Schlegel, D., Hoyle, F., Vogeley, M., Tegmark, M., Bahcall, N. and Brinkmann, J. (2005) A Map of the Universe. The Astrophysical Journal, 624, 463-484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[54] Webster, A. (1982) The Clustering of Quasars from an Objective-Prism Sur-vey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 199, 683-705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[55] Crampton, D., Cowley, A.P. and Hartwick, F.D.A. (1987) The Space Distribution of Faint Quasars from the CFHT Survey. The Astrophysical Journal, 314, 129-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[56] Clowes, R.G. and Campusano, L.E. (1991) A 100-200 Mpc Group of Quasars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 249, 218-226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[57] Mészáros, P. (2006) Gamma-Ray Bursts. Reports on Progress in Physics, 69, 2259-2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[58] Horváth, I., Hakkila, J. and Bagoly, Z. (2014) Possible Structure in the GRB Sky Distribution at Redshift Two. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 561, Article No. L12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[59] Etherington, I.M.H. (2007) Republication of: LX. On the Defi-nition of Distance in General Relativity. General Relativity and Gravitation, 39, 1055-1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[60] Renzi, F., Hogg, N.B. and Giaré, W. (2022) The Resilience of the Etherington-Hubble Relation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 513, 4004-4014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[61] Zumalacárregui, M., García-Bellido, J. and Ruiz-Lapuente, P. (2012) Tension in the Void: Cosmic Rulers Strain Inhomogeneous Cosmologies. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2012, Article No. 009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[62] Kenworthy, W.D., Scolnic, D. and Riess, A. (2019) The Lo-cal Perspective on the Hubble Tension: Local Structure Does Not Impact Measurement of the Hubble Constant. The As-trophysical Journal, 875, Article No. 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[63] Camarena, D., Marra, V., Sakr, Z. and Clarkson, C. (2022) A Void in the Hubble Tension? The End of the Line for the Hubble Bubble. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 39, Article ID: 184001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[64] Camarena, D., Marra, V., Sakr, Z. and Clarkson, C. (2022) The Copernican Principle in Light of the Latest Cosmological Data. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 509, 1291-1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[65] Clarkson, C., Bassett, B. and Lu, T.H.-C. (2008) A General Test of the Copernican Principle. Physical Review Letters, 101, Article ID: 011301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[66] Buchert, T. and Carfora, M. (2008) On the Curvature of the Present-Day Universe. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 25, Article ID: 195001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[67] Goodman, J. (1995) Geocentrism Reexamined. Physical Re-view D, 52, 1821-1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[68] Heavens, A.F., Jimenez, R. and Maartens, R. (2011) Testing Ho-mogeneity with the Fossil Record of Galaxies. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2011, Article No. 035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[69] Phillips, M.M. (1993) The Absolute Magnitudes of Type IA Supernovae. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 413, L105-L108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[70] Hillebrandt, W. and Niemeyer, J.C. (200) Type IA Supernova Explosion Models. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 38, 191-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[71] Riess, A.G, Press, W.H. and Kirshner, R.P. (1995) Using Type IA Supernova Light Curve Shapes to Measure the Hubble Constant. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 438, L17-L20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[72] Guy, J., Astier, P., Nobili, S., Regnault, N. and Pain, R. (2005) SALT: A Spectral Adaptive Light Curve Template for Type IA Supernovae. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 443, 781-791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[73] Campanelli, L., Cea, P., Fogli, G.L. and Marrone, A. (2011) Testing the Isotropy of the Universe with Type IA SUPErnovae. Physical Review D, 83, Article ID: 103503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[74] Li, X., Lin, H.-N., Wang, S. and Chang, Z. (2013) ΛCDM Model with a Scalar Perturbation vs. Preferred Direction of the Universe. European Physical Journal C, 73, Article No. 2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[75] Aluri, P.K., Panda, S., Sharma, M. and Thakur, S. (2013) Anisotropic Universe with Anisotropic Sources. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2013, Article No. 003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[76] Chang, Z., Li, X., Lin, H.-N. and Wang, S. (2014) Constraining Anisotropy of the Universe from Different Groups of Type-IA Supernovae. The European Physical Jour-nal C, 74, Article No. 2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[77] Wang, Y.-Y. and Wang, F.Y. (2018) Testing the Isotropy of the Universe with Type IA Supernovae in a Model-Independent Way. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 474, 3516-3522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[78] Deng, H.-K. and Wei, H. (2018) Testing the Cosmic Anisotropy with Supernovae Data: Hemisphere Comparison and Dipole Fitting. Physical Review D, 97, Article ID: 123515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[79] Antoniou, I. and Perivolaropoulos, L. (2010) Searching for a Cosmological Preferred Axis: Union2 Data Analysis and Comparison with Other Probes. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2010, Article No. 012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[80] Cai, R.-G. and Tuo, Z.-L. (2012) Direction Dependence of the Deceleration Parameter. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2012, Article No. 004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[81] Cai, R.-G., Ma, Y.-Z., Tang, B. and Tuo, Z.-L. (2013) Con-straining the Anisotropic Expansion of Universe. Physical Review D, 87, Article ID: 123522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[82] Zhao, W., Wu, P.X. and Zhang, Y. (2013) Anisotropy of Cos-mic Acceleration. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 22, Article ID: 1350060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[83] Yang, X.F., Wan, F.Y. and Chu, Z. (2014) Searching for a Pre-ferred Direction with Union2.1 Data. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 437, 1840-1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[84] Chang, Z. and Lin, H.-N. (2015) Comparison between Hemisphere Comparison Method and Dipole-Fitting Method in Tracing the Anisotropic Expansion of the Universe Use the Union2 Data Set. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 446, 2952-2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[85] Lin, H.-N., Wang, S., Chang, Z. and Li, X. (2016) Testing the Isotropy of the Universe by Using the JLA Compilation of Type IA Supernovae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci-ety, 456, 1881-1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[86] Lin, H.-N., Li, X. and Chang, Z. (2016) The Significance of Aniso-tropic Signals Hiding in the Type IA Supernovae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 460, 617-626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[87] Chang, Z., Lin, H.-N., Sang, Y. and Wang, S. (2018) A Tomographic Test of Cosmological Principle Using the JLA Compilation of Type IA Supernovae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro-nomical Society, 478, 3633-3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[88] Javanmardi, B., Porciani, C., Kroupa, P. and Pflamm-Altenburg, J. (2015) Probing the Isotropy of Cosmic Acceleration Traced by Type IA Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal, 810, Article No. 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[89] Bengaly, C.A.P., Bernui, A. and Alcaniz, J.S. (2015) Probing Cosmological Isotropy with Type IA Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal, 808, Article No. 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[90] Andrade, U., Bengaly, C.A.P., Alcaniz, J.S. and Santos, B. (2018) Isotropy of Low Redshift Type IA Supernovae: A Bayesian Analysis. Physical Review D, 97, Article ID: 083518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[91] Deng, H.-K. and Wei, H. (2018) Null Signal for the Cosmic Anisotropy in the Pantheon Supernovae Data. The European Physical Journal C, 78, Article No. 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[92] Wang, J.S. and Wang, F.Y. (2014) Probing the Anisotropic Expansion from Supernovae and GRBs in a Model-Independent Way. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 443, 1680-1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[93] Schwarz, D.J. and Weinhorst, B. (2007) (An)Isotropy of the Hubble Diagram: Comparing Hemispheres. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 474, 717-729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[94] Mariano, A. and Perivolaropoulos, L. (2012) Is there Correlation between Fine Structure and Dark Energy Cosmic Dipoles? Physical Review D, 86, Article ID: 083517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[95] Zhao, D., Zhou, Y. and Chang, Z. (2019) Anisotropy of the Universe via the Pantheon Supernovae Sample Revisited. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486, 5679-5689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[96] Colin, J., Mohayaee, R., Sarkar, S. and Shafieloo, A. (2011) Probing the Anisotropic Local Universe and beyond with SNe IA Data. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci-ety, 414, 264-271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[97] Hu, J.P. Wang, Y.Y. and Wang, F.Y. (2020) Testing Cos-mic Anisotropy with Pantheon Sample and Quasars at High Redshifts. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 643, Article No. A93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[98] Broutl, D., Scolnic, D., et al. (2022) The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints. The Astrophysical Journal, 938, Article No. 110.
[99] Kaiser, N. (1986) Evolution and Clustering of Rich Clusters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 222, 323-345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[100] Giodini, S., et al. (2013) Scaling Relations for Galaxy Clusters: Properties and Evolution. Space Science Reviews, 177, 247-282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[101] Migkas, K. and Reiprich, T.H. (2018) Anisotropy of the Galaxy Cluster X-Ray Luminosity-Temperature Relation. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 611, Article No. A50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[102] Amati, L., et al. (2018) The THESEUS Space Mission Concept: Science Case Design and Expected Performances. Advances in Space Research, 62, 191-244.
[103] Wang, F.Y., Dai, Z.G. and Liang, E.W. (2015) Gamma-Ray Burst Cosmology. ArXiv: 1504.00735.
[104] Sokolov, V.V., et al. (2018) The Core Collapse Supernovae, Gamma-Ray Bursts and SN 1987A.
[105] Řípa, J. and Shafieloo, A. (2019) Update on Test-ing the Isotropy of the Properties of Gamma-Ray Bursts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486, 3027-3040.
[106] Andrade, U., Carlos, A.P.B., Alcaniz, J.S. and Capozziello, S. (2019) Revisiting the Statistical Isotro-py of GRB Sky Distribution. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Preprint.
[107] Hartmann, D. and Blu-menthal, G.R. (1989) Angular Clustering Properties of Gamma-Ray Bursts and Quantitative Constraints on Their Dis-tances. The Astrophysical Journal, 342, 521-526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[108] Briggs, M.S., et al. (1996) BATSE Observations of the Large-Scale Isotropy of Gamma-Ray Bursts. The Astrophysical Journal, 459, 40-43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[109] Tegmark, M., Hartmann, D.H., Briggs, M.S. and Meegan, C.A. (1996) The Angular Power Spectrum of BATSE 3B Gamma-Ray Bursts. The Astrophysical Journal, 468, 214-224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[110] Tarnopolski, M. (2017) Testing the Anisotropy in the Angular Distribution of Fermi/GBM Gamma-Ray Bursts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 472, 4819-4831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[111] Řípa, J. and Shafieloo, A. (2017) Testing the Isotropic Universe Using the Gamma-Ray Burst Data of Fermi/GBM. The Astrophysical Journal, 851, Article No. 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[112] Vavrek, R., Balazs, L.G., Meszaros, A., Horvath, I. and Bagoly, Z. (2008) Testing the Randomness in the Sky-Distribution of Gamma-Ray Bursts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom-ical Society, 391, 1741-1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[113] Gerasim, R.V., Orlov, V.V. and Raikov, A.A. (2015) Study of the Large-Scale Distribution of Gamma-Ray Burst Sources by the Method of Pairwise Distances. Astrophysics, 58, 204-215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[114] Shirokov, S.I., Raikov, A.A. and Baryshev, Y.V. (2017) Spatial Distribution of Gamma-Ray Burst Sources. Astrophysics, 60, 484-496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[115] Balázs, L.G., Meszáros, A. and Horváth, I. (1998) Anisotropy of the Sky Distribution of Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 339, 1-6.
[116] Cline, D.B., Matthey, C. and Otwinowski, S. (1999) Study of Very Short Gamma-Ray Bursts. The Astrophysical Journal, 527, 827-834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[117] Magliocchetti, M., Ghirlanda, G. and Celotti, A. (2003) Evidence for Anisot-ropy in the Distribution of Short-Lived Gamma-Ray Bursts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 343, 255-258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[118] Mészáros, A., Bagoly, Z., Horváth, I., Balázs, L.G. and Vavrek, R. (2000) A Remarkable Angular Distribution of the Intermediate Subclass of Gamma-Ray Bursts. The Astro-physical Journal, 539, 98-101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[119] Litvin, V.F., Matveev, S.A., Mamedov, S.V. and Orlov, V.V. (2001) Anisotropy in the Sky Distribution of Short Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astronomy Letters, 27, 416-420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[120] Labini, F.S., Tekhanovich, D. and Baryshev, Y.V. (2014) Spatial Density Fluctuations and Selection Effects in Galaxy Redshift Surveys. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2014, Article No. 035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[121] Risaliti, G. and Lusso, E. (2019) Cosmological Constraints from the Hubble Diagram of Quasars at High Redshifts. Nature Astronomy, 3, 272-277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[122] Zavarygin, E.O. and Webb, J.K. (2019) A Search for Cosmologi-cal Anisotropy Using the Lyman Alpha Forest from SDSS Quasar Spectra. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 489, 3966-3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[123] Cai, R.-G., Cao, Z., Guo, Z.-K., Wang, S.-J. and Yang, T. (2017) The Gravitational-Wave Physics. National Science Review, 4, 687-706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[124] Cai, R.-G., Liu, T.-B., Liu, X.-W., Wang, S.-J. and Yang, T. (2018) Probing Cosmic Anisotropy with Gravitational Waves as Standard Sirens. Physical Review D, 97, Article ID: 103005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[125] Cruz, M., Tucci, M., Martínez-González, E. and Vielva, P. (2006) The Non-Gaussian Cold Spot in Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe: Significance, Morphology and Fore-ground Contribution. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 369, 57-67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[126] Zhang, R. and Huterer, D. (2010) Disks in the Sky: A Re-assessment of the WMAP “Cold Spot”. Astroparticle Physics, 33, 69-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[127] Hanson, D. and Lewis, A. (2009) Estimators for CMB Statistical Anisotropy. Physical Review D, 80, Article ID: 063004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[128] Das, S., Mitra, S., Rotti, A., Pant, N. and Souradeep, T. (2016) Statistical Isotropy Violation in WMAPCMB Maps Resulting from Non-Circular Beams. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 591, Article No. A97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐