基于GARCH-VaR模型的上证指数风险测度
Risk Measurement of Shanghai Composite Index Based on GARCH-VaR Model
摘要: 本文以上证指数的日收益率为样本,对上证指数建立GARCH-VaR模型,比较不同分布假定下GARCH类模型对上证指数波动率的拟合效果,计算并检验上证指数VaR值的预测结果对实际损失的覆盖情况。分析的结果表明,TARCH模型与EGARCH模型更适合测度上证指数条件方差,且在t分布下,模型能够更好地反映上证指数收益率扰动项的分布特征。进一步,为克服ARMA-GARCH模型在中长期预测中出现的较大误差,使用ARIMA-LSTM模型结合GARCH类模型预测指数波动率,有效提高了GARCH-VaR模型的预测准度。最后,通过TARCH模型,初步检验了我国股市注册制全面推行对上证指数波动率所产生的影响,发现该政策的实施显著降低了上证指数的波动幅度。
Abstract: This article takes the daily return of the Shanghai Composite Index as a sample, establishes a GARCH-VaR model for the Shanghai Composite Index, compares the fitting effect of GARCH models on the volatility of the Shanghai Composite Index under different distribution assumptions, calculates and tests the coverage of actual losses by the predicted VaR value of the Shanghai Composite Index. The analysis results indicate that the TARCH model and EGARCH model are more suitable for measuring the conditional variance of the Shanghai Composite Index, and under the t-distribution, the model can better reflect the distribution characteristics of the disturbance term of the Shanghai Composite Index return. Furthermore, to overcome the significant errors in medium- and long-term forecasting caused by the ARMA-GARCH model, the ARIMA-LSTM model combined with GARCH class models was used to predict index volatility, effectively improving the prediction accuracy of the GARCH-VaR model. Finally, through the TARCH model, the impact of the comprehensive implementation of the registration system in China’s stock market on the volatility of the Shanghai Composite Index was preliminarily examined, and it was found that the implementation of this policy significantly reduced the volatility of the Shanghai Composite Index.
文章引用:杨智灵. 基于GARCH-VaR模型的上证指数风险测度[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(4): 2490-2503. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.1341421

参考文献

[1] 高岳, 朱宪辰. 基于极值理论的同业拆借利率风险度量——基于AR-GARCH-POT方法的VaR值比较研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2009, 26(8): 135-147.
[2] 周茂华, 刘骏民, 许平祥. 基于GARCH族模型的黄金市场的风险度量与预测研究[J]. 国际金融研究, 2011(5): 87-96.
[3] 杨超, 李国良, 门明. 国际碳交易市场的风险度量及对我国的启示——基于状态转移与极值理论的VaR比较研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2011, 28(4): 94-109+123.
[4] 严伟祥, 张杰. 基于GARCH-VaR模型的对冲基金市场风险度量研究[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2013, 29(5): 78-83.
[5] 申利. 基于GARCH-VaR模型的外汇风险度量方法的统计比较[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34(21): 163-166.
[6] 张贺, 沈倩, 宁薛平. 基于GARCH-VaR模型的金融科技风险测度[J]. 统计与决策, 2023, 39(24): 142-146.
[7] 朱溪溪, 王文胜. 沪深300指数及其股指期货的风险管理研究——基于VaR-GARCH模型[J]. 中国证券期货, 2023(5): 39-47.
[8] 陈浪南, 黄杰鲲. 中国股票市场波动非对称性的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2002(5): 67-73.
[9] 江涛. 基于GARCH与半参数法VaR模型的证券市场风险的度量和分析: 来自中国上海股票市场的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2010(6): 103-111.
[10] 蒋伟, 顾研. 基于广义已实现测度的Realized GARCH模型改进及应用[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(7): 156-173.
[11] 李翠霞, 陈媛媛. 基于经验分布下GARCH模型对VaR的金融测度[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 60(4): 177-182.
[12] 次必聪, 张品一. 基于ARIMA-LSTM模型的金融时间序列预测[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(11): 145-149.
[13] 吴鑫育, 梅学婷, 周海林, 尹学宝. 时变风险厌恶与人民币汇率波动率——基于GARCH-MIDAS-SK模型的实证研究[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2024, 43(4): 721-736.
[14] Engle, R.F. (1982) Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica, 50, 987-1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Glosten, L.R., Jagannathan, R. and Runkle, D.E. (1993) On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks. The Journal of Finance, 48, 1779-1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Nelson, D.B. (1991) Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach. Econometrica, 59, 347-370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Engle, R.F., Lilien, D.M. and Robins, R.P. (1987) Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in the Term Structure: The Arch-M Model. Econometrica, 55, 391-407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 危冰淋, 刘春雨, 刘家鹏. 基于Transformer-LSTM模型的多因素碳排放权交易价格预测[J]. 价格月刊, 2024(5): 49-57.
[19] 张宗新, 吴钊颖. 科创板基础性制度改革能否提升市场定价效率? [J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(4): 33-46.
[20] 赖黎, 蓝春丹, 秦明春. 市场化改革提升了定价效率吗?——来自注册制的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(4): 172-190+199.