电子商务纠纷中证明责任分配的原则与实践研究
Research on the Principles and Practices of Burden of Proof Allocation in E-Commerce Disputes
摘要: 电子商务纠纷中,证明责任的分配首先要遵循《民事诉讼法》关于举证责任的一般规定,本文在理清电子商务纠纷中证明责任分配这个特定领域的理论基础后,着重探析了三类电子商务纠纷具体领域的责任分配问题:电子商务交易合同的证明责任分配、电子商务侵权纠纷的证明责任分配、电子证明作为证据的证明责任分配,对于电子商务领域内的相关立法具有一定的借鉴意义。此外本文还对比了国内外在该领域内的立法与司法现状,通过对比获得启示进而为完善电子商务领域内相关法律法规提供针对性的建议。
Abstract: In e-commerce disputes, the allocation of burden of proof should first follow the general provisions of the Civil Procedure Law on the burden of proof. After clarifying the theoretical basis of the specific field of burden of proof allocation in e-commerce disputes, this article focuses on exploring the allocation of burden of proof in three specific areas of e-commerce disputes: the allocation of burden of proof in e-commerce transaction contracts, the allocation of burden of proof in e-commerce infringement disputes, and the allocation of burden of proof as evidence in electronic proof. It has certain reference significance for relevant legislation in the field of e-commerce. In addition, this article also compares the legislative and judicial status quo in this field at home and abroad, and obtains inspiration through comparison to provide targeted suggestions for improving relevant laws and regulations in the field of e-commerce through the comparison.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张卫平. 民事诉讼法[M]. 第5版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2019.
|
|
[2]
|
吕日东, 贾惠芳. 民事诉讼证明标准的特性与适用[J]. 山西省政法管理干部学院学报, 2024, 37(3): 58-61.
|
|
[3]
|
刘益灯, 张先友. 网络消费纠纷解决中的在线调解问题及其对策[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 35(3): 120-127.
|
|
[4]
|
苏东东. 电子商务交易平台经营者在专利侵权中的过错认定问题探析[J]. 电子知识产权, 2018(4): 41-50.
|
|
[5]
|
熊英, 贺明星. 电子商务纠纷解决机制研究及立法建议[J]. 中国工商管理研究, 2015(2): 22-26.
|
|
[6]
|
姜英超. 电子商务纠纷在线解决机制研究[J]. 连云港师范高等专科学校学报, 2018, 35(1): 34-38.
|