人工智能生成内容的专利授权研究
Patent-Granting Research for AI-Generated Content
DOI: 10.12677/ds.2024.1011447, PDF,   
作者: 甘 锐:南京理工大学知识产权学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 人工智能专利授权专利权利归属Artificial Intelligence Patent-Granting Ownership of Patent Rights
摘要: 人工智能的飞速发展给技术创造带来便利的同时也引发了一系列问题。人工智能生成内容专利授权面临着劳动财产理论以及人格权理论的障碍,人工智能生成内容对专利制度产生了一定的冲击和影响,现行专利制度下人工智能生成内容获得专利授权存在一定困难,专利权利归属难以确定。本文通过对传统财产权相关哲学理论进行分析,从专利授权客体、专利授权标准出发,明确人工智能生成发明创造具有可专利性,人工智能尚无法取得与自然人一样的发明人地位,专利权利归属可由投资者与使用者进行约定,没有约定的情况下应当归属于投资者。
Abstract: The rapid development of artificial intelligence has brought convenience to the creation of technology, but also caused a series of problems. The patent authorization of AI-generated content faces the obstacles of labor property theory and personality right theory, and AI-generated content has a certain impact and impact on the patent system, and it is difficult to obtain patent authorization for AI-generated content under the current patent system, and it is difficult to determine the ownership of patent rights. Based on the analysis of traditional philosophical theories related to property rights, this paper clarifies that AI-generated inventions and creations are patentable, that AI cannot achieve the same inventor status as natural persons, and that the ownership of patent rights can be agreed between investors and users, and should be attributed to investors if there is no agreement.
文章引用:甘锐. 人工智能生成内容的专利授权研究[J]. 争议解决, 2024, 10(11): 145-150. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2024.1011447

参考文献

[1] 张唯玮, 张武军, 孙雍君. 人工智能生成内容的可专利性及其制度回应[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(13): 122-130.
[2] [英]洛克. 政府论(下) [J]. 叶启芳, 瞿菊农, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆出版社, 1964: 19.
[3] 杨利华. 人工智能生成技术方案的可专利性及其制度因应[J]. 中外法学, 2023, 35(2): 346-364.
[4] 余海燕. 论知识产权的本质及其正当性[J]. 河北法学, 2009, 27(4): 151-154.
[5] 吴汉东. 人工智能生成发明的专利法之问[J]. 当代法学, 2019, 33(4): 24-38.
[6] 刘强, 周奕澄. 人工智能发明专利审查标准研究[J]. 净月学刊, 2018(3): 76-85.
[7] 洪岩. 浅析人工智能技术的专利保护——以医疗领域为例[J]. 知识产权, 2018, 28(12): 74-81.
[8] 刘友华, 魏远山. 人工智能生成技术方案的可专利性及权利归属[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 43(4): 84-90.