人工智能生成物是否属于著作权客体及其侵权认定
Whether the AI-Generated Object Is the Object of Copyright and Its Infringement Determination
摘要: 人工智能生成物的出现给人们带来了很多便利,但是它也存在一些潜在的风险和挑战,基于目前学界的研究成果和过往的司法案例,同时结合域外法的相关规定,厘清人工智能生成物是否属于著作权的客体,对著作权纠纷存在的问题以及深层原因进行分析,探讨人工智能生成物在著作权纠纷上应明确责任主体、建立侵权行为的认定规则、合理确定侵权责任归责原则以及分析借鉴域外的一些规制进行化解。
Abstract: The emergence of artificial intelligence generated objects has brought a lot of convenience to people, but it also has some potential risks and challenges, based on the current academic research results and past judicial cases, combined with the relevant provisions of foreign laws, to clarify whether artificial intelligence generated objects belong to the object of copyright, to analyze the problems and deep causes of copyright disputes, to discuss the artificial intelligence generated products in copyright disputes should clarify the subject of responsibility, establish the rules for determining infringement, Reasonably determine the principle of attribution of tort liability, and analyze and learn from some extraterritorial regulations to resolve it.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王迁. 著作权法[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2015: 20-27.
|
|
[2]
|
孙正樑. 人工智能生成内容的著作权问题探析[J]. 清华法学, 2019, 13(6): 190-204.
|
|
[3]
|
孙山. 人工智能生成内容的作品属性证成[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2018, 33(5): 84-94.
|
|
[4]
|
杨利华. 人工智能生成物著作权问题探究[J]. 现代法学, 2021, 43(4): 102-114.
|
|
[5]
|
廖斯. 论人工智能创作物的独创性构成与权利归属[J]. 西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(2): 79-85.
|
|
[6]
|
丁晓东. 著作权的解构与重构: 人工智能作品法律保护的法理反思[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2023, 29(5): 109-127.
|
|
[7]
|
宋先发, 龚模干. 人工智能生成物著作权问题研究——以ChatGPT生成物为例[J]. 互联网天地, 2023(4): 34-41.
|
|
[8]
|
王群, 付丽娟. 人工智能侵权责任探析[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(10): 107-110.
|