算法歧视对平等权保护的挑战及对策
Challenges and Countermeasures of Algorithmic Discrimination to the Protection of Equality Rights
摘要: 互联网的迅速发展使得人工智能技术突飞猛进,作为其核心的算法技术的运用范围也越来越广泛。但算法并非中立的,在面对公平与效率时,往往会舍弃公平而选择效率。随着算法的广泛应用,加之算法运行的自身特点,算法歧视愈演愈烈,由于算法的不可解释性及自身存在的一些缺陷,对于平等权的传统保护模式也因此受到危机,传统法律难以应对算法歧视、识别算法歧视存在困难、司法救济途径不畅等问题使得公民的平等权无法得到有效保护。因此,应从健全法律机制、加强算法监管以及保障权益救济等方面进行规制,使之沿着法治的轨道健康发展。
Abstract: The rapid development of the Internet makes artificial intelligence technology advance by leaps and bounds, and the application scope of algorithm technology as its core is becoming more and more extensive. As a technical means of computer programming, it can greatly improve social efficiency and bring many opportunities for the development of human society. But the algorithm is not neutral, in the face of fairness and efficiency, often will abandon fairness and choose efficiency. With the wide application of algorithm and its own characteristics, algorithm discrimination becomes more and more fierce, and the traditional protection mode of equal rights is also in crisis.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张玉宏, 秦志光, 肖乐. 大数据算法的歧视本质[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2017, 33(5): 81-86.
|
|
[2]
|
孟令宇. 从算法偏见到算法歧视: 算法歧视的责任问题探究[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(1): 1-9.
|
|
[3]
|
刘朝. 算法歧视的表现、成因与治理策略[J]. 人民论坛, 2022(2): 64-68.
|
|
[4]
|
石颖. 算法歧视的缘起、挑战与法律应对[J]. 甘肃政法大学学报, 2022(3): 58-68.
|
|
[5]
|
崔靖梓. 算法歧视挑战下平等权保护的危机与应对[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2019, 37(3): 29-42.
|
|
[6]
|
吴喜, 梁阿敏. 新媒体视域下的平等权保护——对网络仇恨言论的反思[J]. 河北法学, 2020, 38(7): 24-38.
|
|
[7]
|
刘友华. 算法偏见及其规制路径研究[J]. 法学杂志, 2019, 40(6): 55-66.
|