慢性病共病中老年人居民医疗保险参与情况的影响因素研究——基于二元逻辑回归和决策树模型的量化分析
Analysis of Influencing Factors of Medical Insurance Participation Willingness of Middle-Aged and Elderly Residents with Chronic Disease Comorbidities—A Quantitative Analysis Based on Binary Logistic Regression and Decision Tree Model
摘要: 目的:探讨慢性病共病中老年人居民医疗保险参与情况的影响因素,为有关部门施策以提高参保率提供现实依据。方法:基于计划行为理论与中国健康与养老追踪调查数据(2020CHARLS),构建影响指标体系并运用Kruskal-Wallis检验、二元逻辑回归、决策树分析变量对医保参与影响。结果:共纳入8743名调查对象,参保率78.6%;逻辑回归显示年龄、教育、户口、退休情况、婚姻与同居状况、养老保险参与、个人年收入、子女提供经济支持有显著影响(P < 0.05);决策树显示养老保险参与为主要影响因素,其次是个人年收入、退休情况、户口、婚姻状况;决策树预测效果(AUC = 0.904)稍优于逻辑回归(AUC = 0.883)。结论:年龄<80岁、农业户口、未退休、已婚、参与居民养老保险、收入较高、子女提供较多经济支持是关键影响因素。逻辑回归和决策树分别展示自变量与因变量间依存关系、变量间交互关系对因变量的影响,可结合二者进行医保参与相关分析。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the influencing factors of medical insurance participation of middle-aged and elderly residents with chronic diseases, and to provide practical basis for relevant departments to improve the insurance participation rate. Methods: Based on the theory of planned behavior and the data of China Health and Pension Tracking Survey (2020CHARLS), an impact indicator system was constructed and Kruskal-Wallis test, binary logistic regression and decision tree were used to analyze the impact of variables on medical insurance participation. Results: A total of 8743 respondents were included, and the insurance rate was 78.6%; Logistic regression showed that age, education, household registration, retirement, marital status, pension insurance participation, personal annual income and financial support provided by children had significant effects (P < 0.05). The decision tree shows that pension insurance participation is the main influencing factor, followed by personal annual income, retirement, household registration and marital status. The prediction effect of decision tree (AUC = 0.904) was slightly better than logistic regression (AUC = 0.883). Conclusion: Age < 80 years old, agricultural household registration, not retired, married, participating in residents’ pension insurance, higher income, more financial support provided by children are the key influencing factors. Logistic regression and decision tree respectively show the interdependence between independent variables and dependent variables, and the influence of interaction between variables on dependent variables, the correlation analysis of medical insurance participation can be combined with the two.
文章引用:陈莹莹, 温勇. 慢性病共病中老年人居民医疗保险参与情况的影响因素研究——基于二元逻辑回归和决策树模型的量化分析[J]. 建模与仿真, 2024, 13(6): 6037-6046. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2024.136553

参考文献

[1] 余冰玥. 国家卫健委: 2023年我国重大慢病过早死亡率降至15% [N/OL]. 中国青年报, 2024-09-12.
https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202409/content_6974128.htm, 2024-09-23.
[2] 国家医疗保障局. 2023年全国医疗保障事业发展统计公报[Z/OL]. 2024-07-25.
http://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2024/7/25/art_7_13340.html, 2024-09-23.
[3] 刘子宁, 郑伟, 贾若, 等. 医疗保险、健康异质性与精准脱贫——基于贫困脆弱性的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019(5): 56-75.
[4] 李乐乐, 王曦. 城乡居民基本医疗保险门诊统筹对慢性病患者健康水平的影响机制分析[J]. 保险研究, 2024(8): 100-112.
[5] Ajzen, I. (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 段文婷, 江光荣. 计划行为理论述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2008(2): 315-320.
[7] 曾泉海. 计划行为理论视角下居民参与商业养老保险的影响因素研究[J]. 武汉商学院学报, 2022, 36(4): 59-64.
[8] 赵俊娟, 李菲. 普惠型商业医疗保险参保情况影响因素分析——基于Logistic回归和CHAID决策树模型[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2024, 41(5): 523-528.
[9] 邓欣欣, 梁翠, 商雪, 等. 我国城乡居民基本医疗保险参保情况及其影响因素的meta分析[J]. 医学与社会, 2024, 37(6): 102-107.
[10] Zelalem, R., Ebissa, N., Tesfaye, S., et al. (2022) Willingness to Join and Pay Social Health Insurance and Associated Factors among Public Sectors Workers in Didu Woreda, Southwest Ethiopia, 2018. Journal of Public Health Research, 11, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 张雷, 顾天竹. 子女增加会减少父母对商业保险的需求吗?——基于中国综合社会调查的实证分析[J]. 南方金融, 2020(5): 63-72.
[12] 王志刚, 周永刚, 朱艺云. “养儿防老”与“新农保”: 替代还是互补——基于福建省厦门、漳州和龙岩三市的问卷调查[J]. 中国经济问题, 2013(6): 20-27.
[13] 王超群. 谁没有参保? 中国城乡居民医疗保险参保的人群特征研究[J]. 社会保障评论, 2023, 7(2): 76-93.
[14] 王寒霄, 王海鑫, 余畅, 等. 社会保险、风险态度与家庭风险金融市场参与——基于2019中国家庭金融调查(CHFS)数据的研究[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2023(3): 106-118.
[15] 夏会珍, 王亚柯. 中国老年人收入的结构特征——兼论养老保险对老年人收入的影响[J]. 上海对外经贸大学学报, 2024, 31(5): 36-48+63.