直播电商营销绩效的主播影响因素组态路径研究
Research on Configuration Path of Anchor Influencing Factors for Live Streaming E-Commerce Marketing Performance
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2024.1341583, PDF,   
作者: 李永志, 代 丽:浙江理工大学经济管理学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 直播电商营销绩效主播组态分析fsQCALive Streaming E-Commerce Marketing Performance Anchors Configuration Analysis fsQCA
摘要: 直播电商逐渐成为消费者购物的新形态,然而这一过程中主播与直播带货营销绩效之间的影响机制尚不明晰,带货商品品类复杂繁多,主播带货“翻车”事件不断涌现。基于此,本文使用fsQCA探究主播组态路径分别对低单价商品和高单价商品的直播带货营销绩效影响。研究结果表明:低互动性是导致高单价商品和低单价商品低带货绩效的必要条件。对于低单价商品而言,主播在影响力、吸引力、互动性、专业性四项能力中,有一项表现突出,就有可能取得较高的直播带货营销绩效,而高单价商品带货主播则至少在两个方面有突出表现。其中,吸引力对低单价商品直播带货更为重要,低单价商品能够通过直播时长来提高绩效,而专业性和可信性对于高单价商品更为关键,高单价商品带货绩效与直播时长没有太大关联。两种商品组态分析解的整体一致性均高于0.9,具有较强的解释力,研究结论丰富了直播营销和主播特征的理论研究框架,为提高直播电商营销效果提供了更加科学的实践指导。
Abstract: The live streaming e-commerce is gradually becoming a new form of consumer shopping. However, the influence mechanism between the anchor and the live streaming e-commerce marketing performance in this process is not clear, and the live streaming e-commerce “Rollover” events continue to emerge. Based on this background and considering the complexity of live streaming e-commerce products, this research used configuration analysis to explore the impact of anchors on the marketing performance of live streaming e-commerce for low and high priced products. The results of the research show that low interactivity is a necessary condition that leads to low performance for both high-unit-price goods and low-unit-price goods. For low unit-price commodities, anchors who excel in one of the four competencies of influence, attractiveness, interactivity, and professionalism are likely to achieve high live streaming e-commerce marketing performance, while high-unit-price commodity anchors excel in at least two of them. Among them, attractiveness is more important for low-unit-price goods live e-commerce, and low-unit-price goods are able to improve their performance through the duration of live e-commerce, while professionalism and trustworthiness are more critical for high-unit-price goods, and the performance of high-unit-price goods is not very much correlated with the live broadcasting duration. The overall consistency of the two product configuration analysis solutions is higher than 0.9, which has strong explanatory power. The conclusions of this study enrich the theoretical research framework of live streaming marketing and anchor characteristics, and provide more scientific practical guidance for improving the marketing effect of live streaming e-commerce.
文章引用:李永志, 代丽. 直播电商营销绩效的主播影响因素组态路径研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(4): 3797-3808. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.1341583

参考文献

[1] 中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC). 第52次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[R]. 2023-08-28.
[2] 肖勇波, 王旭红, 喻静, 等. 直播电商: 管理挑战与潜在研究方向[J/OL]. 中国管理科学, 1-16.
https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1113, 2023-11-28.
[3] Clement Addo, P., Fang, J., Asare, A.O. and Kulbo, N.B. (2021) Customer Engagement and Purchase Intention in Live-Streaming Digital Marketing Platforms. The Service Industries Journal, 41, 767-786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Scanfeld, D., Scanfeld, V. and Larson, E.L. (2010) Dissemination of Health Information through Social Networks: Twitter and Antibiotics. American Journal of Infection Control, 38, 182-188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Cheng, C., Hu, Y., Lu, Y., et al. (2019) Everyone Can Be a Star: Understanding the Role of Live Video Streaming in Online Retail. Social Science Electronic Publishing.
[6] 王婕. 信息源特性对品牌传播有效性的影响机理及营销启示[J]. 现代商业, 2012(30): 88-89.
[7] 刘忠宇, 赵向豪, 龙蔚. 网红直播带货下消费者购买意愿的形成机制——基于扎根理论的分析[J]. 中国流通经济, 2020, 34(8): 48-57.
[8] Silvera, D.H. and Austad, B. (2004) Factors Predicting the Effectiveness of Celebrity Endorsement Advertisements. European Journal of Marketing, 38, 1509-1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 孟陆, 刘凤军, 陈斯允, 等. 我可以唤起你吗?——不同类型直播网红信息源特性对消费者购买意愿的影响机制研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(1): 131-143.
[10] 喻国明, 李彪, 杨雅. 电商行业内容生态的现状、问题与治理对策[J]. 新闻与写作, 2023(3): 73-81.
[11] Ragin, C.C. (2014) The Comparative Method. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 蝉妈妈智库. 2023抖音电商年报[R].
[13] 鞠雪楠, 赵宣凯, 孙宝文. 跨境电商平台克服了哪些贸易成本?——来自“敦煌网”数据的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(2): 181-196.
[14] 程盛华. “援鄂复苏”背景下直播带货营销绩效评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2020.
[15] 马述忠, 陈丽, 张洪胜. 中国跨境电商上市企业综合绩效研究[J]. 国际商务研究, 2018, 39(2): 48-66.
[16] 汪旭晖, 王佳淏, 乌云. 专门带货还是分享带货: 网红直播类型与产品类型的交互作用对消费者购买意愿的影响[J]. 财经论丛, 2023(5): 78-90.
[17] 赖红波, 杨子婵. 场景视角下设计驱动智能产品创新对感知情感与口碑传播的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(24): 31-40.
[18] 张春玲, 范默苒. 消费者购买决策过程如何影响短视频社交平台内容营销效果?——基于“抖音”38个农产品案例的fsQCA分析[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2023, 43(9): 54-70.
[19] 王翠翠, 徐静, 秦海生, 等. 电商主播类型对消费者购买行为的影响: AI主播和真人主播[J]. 管理科学, 2023, 36(4): 30-43.
[20] 黄炜, 伍琪, 田萌. 互动仪式链视角下的电商直播用户参与行为影响因素研究[J]. 现代情报, 2024, 44(1): 71-82.
[21] 朱晓东, 郭亚捷, 丁莲. 考虑主播影响力的制造商销售渠道选择研究[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 46(4): 568-576.
[22] 沈霄, 吕俊. 官员直播带货传播效果的影响因素组态路径研究——基于140个案例的模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 电子政务, 2024(1): 102-112.
[23] Fiss, P.C. (2011) Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 393-420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用: 定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(9): 1312-1323.
[25] Ragin, C.C. (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef