ESG评级差异与企业盈利能力
ESG Rating Differences and Corporate Profitability
摘要: 随着ESG理念在我国广泛传播并不断发展,众多投资者在进行决策时将企业的ESG表现纳入决策之中。然而,各个评级机构针对企业给出的ESG评价存在差异,影响ESG评级数据使用者和企业。本文以2015~2022年我国沪深A股上市公司为研究样本,探究ESG评级差异对企业盈利能力的影响。研究发现,ESG评级差异与企业盈利能力有着显著的负相关关系,并且在一系列稳健性检验后仍然成立,机制检验发现外界公众环境关注度能够增强两者之间的关系,异质性分析发现ESG评级差异对国企和ESG表现好的企业的影响较小。最后,本文根据以上结论针对政府、投资者以及企业提出建议以供参考。
Abstract: As the ESG concept has been widely spread and continuously developed in China, many investors have included the ESG performance of enterprises in their decision-making. However, there are differences in ESG evaluations given by various rating agencies for enterprises, affecting ESG rating data users and enterprises. This paper takes China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2022 as a research sample to explore the impact of ESG rating divergence on corporate profitability. It is found that ESG rating divergence has a significant negative correlation with corporate profitability and still hold after a series of robustness tests, the mechanism test finds that external public environmental concern can enhance the relationship between the two, and the heterogeneity analysis finds that ESG rating divergence have a smaller impact on SOEs and ESG-performing companies. Finally, based on the above conclusions, this paper provides recommendations for the government, investors and enterprises for reference.
文章引用:刘世龙. ESG评级差异与企业盈利能力[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(4): 4548-4557. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.1341675

参考文献

[1] Berg, F., Kölbel, J.F. and Rigobon, R. (2022) Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. Review of Finance, 26, 1315-1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 王凯, 张志伟. 国内外ESG评级现状, 比较及展望[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(2): 137-143.
[3] Kotsantonis, S. and Serafeim, G. (2019) Four Things No One Will Tell You about ESG Data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31, 50-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Dimson, E., Marsh, P. and Staunton, M. (2020) Divergent ESG Ratings. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 47, 75-87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 孙俊秀, 谭伟杰, 郭峰. 中国主流ESG评级的再评估[J]. 财经研究, 2024, 50(5): 4-18, 78.
[6] 李鑫, 廖原. ESG评级体系的差异与优化研究——来自彭博和万得的证据[J]. 金融监管研究, 2023(7): 64-77.
[7] Kimbrough, M.D., Wang, X., Wei, S. and Zhang, J. (2022) Does Voluntary ESG Reporting Resolve Disagreement among ESG Rating Agencies? European Accounting Review, 33, 15-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 朱富显, 徐晓莉, 李双圆. 信息披露会加剧ESG评级分歧吗[J]. 财会月刊, 2024, 45(8): 65-72.
[9] 张云齐, 杨淏宇, 张笑语. ESG评级分歧与债务资本成本[J]. 金融评论, 2023, 15(4): 22-43, 124.
[10] 刘向强, 杨晴晴, 胡珺. ESG评级分歧与股价同步性[J]. 中国软科学, 2023(8): 108-120.
[11] 周泽将, 谷文菁, 伞子瑶. ESG评级分歧与分析师盈余预测准确性[J]. 中国软科学, 2023(10): 164-176.
[12] 柳学信, 吴鑫玉, 孔晓旭. 上市公司ESG表现与股票收益——基于股价中企业特质信息含量视角[J]. 会计之友, 2023(10): 85-93.
[13] 王艳丽, 陈佳欣, 林旭琦. ESG评级分歧与审计费用[J]. 财会月刊, 2024, 45(7): 84-90.
[14] 何瑛, 于文蕾, 杨棉之. CEO复合型职业经历、企业风险承担与企业价值[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(9): 155-173.
[15] 周泽将, 丁晓娟, 伞子瑶. ESG评级分歧与审计风险溢价[J]. 审计研究, 2023(6): 72-83.
[16] 李晓艳, 梁日新, 吴秋生. ESG评级如何影响企业投融资期限错配?——基于ESG不确定性的视角[J/OL]. 南开管理评论, 1-44.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/12.1288.F.20240522.1839.002, 2024-09-20.
[17] 赵子铱, 张紫红, 马新松. ESG评级分歧与股票收益——内部控制与外部关注的调节效应[J]. 金融发展研究, 2024(3): 33-43.