科技型中小企业信用融资对企业全要素生产率的影响研究
Research on the Impact of Credit Financing of Technology-Based Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises on the Total Factor Productivity of Enterprises
摘要: 金融市场是经济发展的基础,其成熟度是决定经济发展水平的重要因素,而我国金融市场和金融体系存在多层次、结构性问题,面临发展不均衡、不充分等困境。基于2012~2022年我国科技型中小企业数据,采用系统GMM法检验信用融资对企业全要素生产率的作用机制。结果表明:科技型企业信用融资与企业全要素生产率呈现正向关系,即信用融资增加,企业全要素生产率提高;融资约束在信用融资和企业全要素生产率之间存在部分中介作用;成熟期企业信用融资能够提高企业全要素生产率。结论的政策启示在于:考虑科技型中小企业的发展特点,采用针对性措施提高全要素生产率,同时减少“规模歧视”和“所有制歧视”,监管部门完善市场信息披露机制。
Abstract: The financial market is the foundation of economic development, and its maturity is an important factor in determining the level of economic development, while China’s financial market and financial system have multi-level and structural problems, and face the dilemma of uneven and insufficient development. Based on the data of China’s technology-based small and medium-sized enterprises from 2012 to 2022, the systematic GMM method is used to test the mechanism of credit financing on the total factor productivity of enterprises. The results show that there is a positive relationship between the credit financing of science and technology enterprises and the total factor productivity of enterprises, that is, the increase of credit financing increases the total factor productivity of enterprises. Financing constraints play a partial mediating role between credit financing and firm total factor productivity. Credit financing for enterprises in the mature stage can improve the total factor productivity of enterprises. The policy implications of the conclusion are as follows: considering the development characteristics of technology-based small and medium-sized enterprises, taking targeted measures to improve total factor productivity, while reducing “scale discrimination” and “ownership discrimination”, and improving the market information disclosure mechanism by the regulatory authorities.
文章引用:兰高娴. 科技型中小企业信用融资对企业全要素生产率的影响研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(4): 4613-4622. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.1341683

参考文献

[1] Arrow, K.J. (1962) Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: Nelson, R.R., Ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton University Press, 609-626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Grossman, G.M. and Helpman, E. (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy: Gene. MIT Press, 359.
[3] Nelson, R. and Phelps, E. (1966) Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economic Growth. American Economic Review, 56, 69-75.
[4] Hsieh, C. and Klenow, P.J. (2009) Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 1403-1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 宋跃刚, 吴耀国. 制度环境、OFDI与企业全要素生产率进步的空间视角分析[J]. 世界经济研究, 2016(11): 70.
[6] 李政, 杨思莹, 路京京. 政府补贴对制造企业全要素生产率的异质性影响[J]. 经济管理, 2019, 41(3): 5-20.
[7] 肖文, 薛天航. 劳动力成本上升、融资约束与企业全要素生产率变动[J]. 世界经济, 2019, 42(1): 76-94.
[8] 盛明泉, 汪顺, 商玉萍. 金融资产配置与实体企业全要素生产率: “产融相长”还是“脱实向虚” [J]. 财贸研究, 2018, 29(10): 87.
[9] 李唐, 董一鸣, 王泽宇. 管理效率、质量能力与企业全要素生产率——基于“中国企业-劳动力匹配调查”的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(7): 86-99+184.
[10] 王洪盾, 岳华, 张旭. 公司治理结构与公司绩效关系研究——基于企业全要素生产率的视角[J]. 上海经济研究, 2019(4): 17-27.
[11] 毛德凤, 李静, 彭飞, 骆正清. 研发投入与企业全要素生产率——基于PSM和GPS的检验[J]. 财经研究, 2013, 39(4): 134-144.
[12] 赵春明, 文磊, 赵梦初. 融资约束对企业全要素生产率的影响——基于工业企业数据的研究[J]. 经济经纬, 2015, 32(3): 66-72.
[13] 陈熙, 朱玉杰. 融资融券对企业全要素生产率影响的研究——来自我国上市公司的实证研究[J]. 技术经济, 2021, 40(8): 41-50.
[14] 王杰, 刘斌. 环境规制与企业全要素生产率——基于中国工业企业数据的验证分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014(3): 44-56.
[15] 邹建军, 刘金山. 财政科技支出能否提振企业全要素生产率?——基于地方政府行为视角下的实证检验[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), 2020, 41(3): 92-104.
[16] 陆正飞, 杨德明. 商业信用: 替代性融资, 还是买方市场? [J]. 管理世界, 2011(4): 6-14+45.
[17] Hadlock, C.J. and Pierce, J.R. (2010) New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving beyond the KZ Index. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 1909-1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 杜勇, 鄢波. 债务融资行为对亏损上市公司财务价值的驱动研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2011(7): 43-50.
[19] 许家云. 人民币汇率与中国制造业出口企业行为研究——基于企业异质性视角的理论与实证分析[D]: [博士学位论文]. 天津: 南开大学, 2015.