基于机器学习的已实现波动率预测
Based on Machine Learning for Realized Volatility Prediction
摘要: 选取上证综指5分钟高频数据,以高频价格序列的强记忆性为切入点,构建基于高频价格序列的长短期记忆模型LSTM。基于已实现波动率(RV)理论计算出真实波动率的预测值,选择了效果优异的随机森林模型、弹性网络模型以及直接对波动率建模的LSTM模型进行对比分析,以找出表现较优的预测模型,以期为深度学习在波动率的预测上提供了新思路。研究发现:基于高频价格序列的LSTM波动率预测模型的预测能力明显优于其他两种模型,充分发挥了长短期记忆模型的优势。
Abstract: Selecting the 5-minute high-frequency data of the Shanghai Composite Index and taking the strong memory of the high-frequency price sequence as the entry point, a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model based on the high-frequency price sequence was constructed. Based on the realized volatility (RV) theory, the predicted values of the real volatility were calculated. The random forest model with excellent results, the elastic network model, and the LSTM model directly modeling the volatility were selected for comparative analysis to identify the better-performing prediction model, with the aim of providing new ideas for deep learning in volatility prediction. It was found that the prediction ability of the LSTM volatility prediction model based on the high-frequency price sequence was significantly better than the other two models, giving full play to the advantages of the long short-term memory model.
文章引用:蔡奉珊. 基于机器学习的已实现波动率预测[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(4): 4751-4761. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.1341700

参考文献

[1] 杨科, 张洲深, 田凤平. 高频数据环境下我国股票市场的波动率预测——基于机器学习和HAR模型的融合研究[J]. 计量经济学报, 2023, 3(3): 886-904.
[2] Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J. (1997) Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation, 9, 1735-1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Andersen, T.G. and Bollerslev, T. (1998) Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models Do Provide Accurate Forecasts. International Economic Review, 39, 885-905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Hansen, P.R. (2005) A Test for Superior Predictive Ability. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 23, 365-380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Corsi, F. (2008) A Simple Approximate Long-Memory Model of Realized Volatility. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 7, 174-196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Kumar, P.H. and Patil, S.B. (2017) A Hybrid Regression and Deep Learning LSTM Based Technique for Predicting Volatility Index (VIX) Direction of Change (Trend). Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 11, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Lei, B., Liu, Z. and Song, Y. (2021) On Stock Volatility Forecasting Based on Text Mining and Deep Learning under High‐frequency Data. Journal of Forecasting, 40, 1596-1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 徐正国, 张世英. 调整“已实现”波动率与GARCH及SV模型对波动的预测能力的比较研究[J]. 系统工程, 2004(8): 60-63.
[9] 魏宇. 中国股票市场的最优波动率预测模型研究——基于沪深300指数高频数据的实证分析[J]. 管理学报, 2010, 7(6): 936-942.
[10] 陈卫华. 基于深度学习的上证综指波动率预测效果比较研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2018, 33(5): 99-106.
[11] 魏宇. 沪深300股指期货的波动率预测模型研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2010, 13(2): 66-76.
[12] 李航, 何枫. 沪深300波动率预测模型研究: 基于中国股票和期货市场高频数据分析[J]. 广义虚拟经济研究, 2017, 8(4): 88-96.
[13] 王苏生, 王俊博, 许桐桐, 等. 基于ARMA-GARCH-SN模型的沪深300股指期货日内波动率研究与预测[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(4): 153-161.
[14] Karpathy, A., Johnson, J. and Li, F. (2015) Visualizing and Understanding Recurrent Networks.