甲胎蛋白异质体3等三项肿瘤指标物对不同甲胎蛋白状态下原发性肝癌的诊断价值
Diagnostic Value of Three Tumor Biomarkers, Including Alpha Fetoprotein Variants 3, for Primary Liver Cancer in Various Alpha-Fetoprotein Conditions
摘要: 目的:探讨甲胎蛋白异质体3 (Alpha fetoprotein Variants 3)等三项肿瘤指标物对不同甲胎蛋白(alpha fetoprotein, AFP)状态下原发性肝癌(primary liver cancer, PLC)的诊断价值。方法:回顾性选取我院门诊和住院的182例乙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis B virus, HBV)感染者为研究对象,将肝癌组分为AFP阳性亚组及AFP阴性亚组,采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线评价不同肿瘤标志物对PLC的诊断效能。结果:血清ALT、AST、ALP、ALB、PLT、PT和INR水平在肝癌组、慢乙肝组以及肝硬化组三组之间有统计学差异(P < 0.05),血清GGT、TBIL、DBIL、IBIL和GLB水平在三组间统计学上无显著差异(P > 0.05)。AFP阳性亚组的血清AFP、AFP-L3和AFP-L3%水平均较高,且差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05),GP73水平高于阴性组(P > 0.05)。无论是AFP阳性亚组还是AFP阴性亚组与非肝癌组相比较时,GP73的水平差别并不显著(P > 0.05)。AFP阳性亚组中,除了AFP外,AFP-L3表现出最高的灵敏度(97.30%)和特异度(84.50%),而在AFP阴性亚组中,AFP-L3%表现出最高的特异度。结论:血清AFP-L3、AFP-L3%水平在AFP阳性亚组时对原发性肝癌的诊断价值较高,血清GP73水平对PLC诊断的价值较低。
Abstract: Objective: Exploring the diagnostic value of three tumor indicators, including alpha fetoprotein Variants 3, for primary liver cancer (PLC) under different alpha fetoprotein (AFP) states. Method: A retrospective study was conducted on 182 patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in our hospital’s outpatient and inpatient departments. The liver cancer group was divided into AFP positive and AFP negative subgroups, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of different tumor markers for PLC. Results: Serum ALT, AST, ALP, ALB, PLT, PT and INR levels were significantly different among the three groups (P < 0.05) There was no significant difference in serum GGT, TBIL, DBIL, IBIL, and GLB levels among the three groups (P > 0.05). The serum levels of AFP, AFP-L3, and AFP-L3% were higher in the AFP positive subgroup, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The GP73 level was higher in the AFP positive subgroup than in the negative subgroup (P > 0.05). The difference in GP73 levels between the AFP positive and AFP negative subgroups and the non liver cancer group was not significant (P > 0.05). In the AFP positive subgroup, besides AFP, AFP-L3 showed the highest sensitivity (97.30%) and specificity (84.50%), while in the AFP negative subgroup, AFP-L3% showed the highest specificity. Conclusion: The diagnostic value of serum AFP-L3 and AFP-L3% levels for primary liver cancer is higher in the AFP positive subgroup, while the diagnostic value of serum GP73 level for PLC is lower.
文章引用:袁文利, 邹桂舟. 甲胎蛋白异质体3等三项肿瘤指标物对不同甲胎蛋白状态下原发性肝癌的诊断价值[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(11): 1301-1307. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2024.14113015

参考文献

[1] Chen, W., Zheng, R., Baade, P.D., Zhang, S., Zeng, H., Bray, F., et al. (2016) Cancer Statistics in China, 2015. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 66, 115-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Qi, J., Li, M., Wang, L., Hu, Y., Liu, W., Long, Z., et al. (2023) National and Subnational Trends in Cancer Burden in China, 2005-20: An Analysis of National Mortality Surveillance Data. The Lancet Public Health, 8, e943-e955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Zeng, H., Chen, W., Zheng, R., Zhang, S., Ji, J.S., Zou, X., et al. (2018) Changing Cancer Survival in China during 2003-15: A Pooled Analysis of 17 Population-Based Cancer Registries. The Lancet Global Health, 6, e555-e567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 杨福洁. 凝血四项指标及肿瘤标志物在乙型肝炎相关肝癌诊断中的应用价值[J]. 临床检验杂志(电子版), 2019, 8(4): 186.
[5] Wang, X., Mao, M., He, Z., Zhang, L., Li, H., Lin, J., et al. (2019) Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram in AFP-Negative Hepatocellular Carcinoma. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 15, 221-228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2017年版) [J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2017, 33(8): 1419-1431.
[7] Durazo, F.A., Blatt, L.M., Corey, W.G., Lin, J., Han, S., Saab, S., et al. (2008) Des‐γ‐Carboxyprothrombin, Α‐Fetoprotein and AFP‐L3 in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis, Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 23, 1541-1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Toyoda, H., Kumada, T. and Tada, T. (2011) Highly Sensitive Lens culinaris Agglutinin-Reactive α-Fetoprotein: A New Tool for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncology, 81, 61-65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Matsuda, M., Asakawa, M., Amemiya, H. and Fujii, H. (2011) Lens culinaris Agglutinin‐Reactive Fraction of AFP Is a Useful Prognostic Biomarker for Survival after Repeat Hepatic Resection for HCC. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 26, 731-738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Bae, J.S., Park, S.J., Park, K.B., Paik, S.Y., Ryu, J.K., Choi, C.K., et al. (2005) Acute Exacerbation of Hepatitis in Liver Cirrhosis with Very High Levels of Alpha-Fetoprotein but No Occurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 20, 80-85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Norman, J.S., Li, P.J., Kotwani, P., Shui, A.M., Yao, F. and Mehta, N. (2023) AFP-L3 and DCP Strongly Predict Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Liver Transplantation. Journal of Hepatology, 79, 1469-1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Khien, V.V., Mao, H.V., Chinh, T.T., Ha, P.T., Bang, M.H., Lac, B.V., et al. (2001) Clinical Evaluation of Lentil Lectin-Reactive Alpha-Fetoprotein-L3 in Histology-Proven Hepatocellular Carcinoma. The International Journal of Biological Markers, 16, 105-111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Li, D., Mallory, T. and Satomura, S. (2001) AFP-L3: A New Generation of Tumor Marker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clinica Chimica Acta, 313, 15-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 赵睿, 王启之. 肝癌诊断的肿瘤标志物研究进展[J]. 国际消化病杂志, 2013, 33(1): 29-31.
[15] 丁艳, 李丹, 王念跃, 等. 高尔基蛋白73、甲胎蛋白异质体3、甲胎蛋白和α-L-岩藻糖苷酶在肝脏疾病中的诊断价值[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2014, 30(8): 785-789.