基于非对称高斯混合模型的遥感图像去噪算法
Remote Sensing Image Denoising Algorithm Based on Asymmetric Gaussian Mixture Model
DOI: 10.12677/aam.2024.1311480, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 程绘宇:长春理工大学数学与统计学院,吉林 长春;贾小宁:长春理工大学数学与统计学院,吉林 长春;长春理工大学中山研究院遥感技术与大数据分析实验室,广东 中山
关键词: 非对称高斯混合分布EM算法遥感图像去噪低秩矩阵分解Aasymmetric Gaussian Mixed Distribution EM Algorithm Remote Sensing Image Denoising Low-Rank Matrix Factorization
摘要: 遥感图像在采集时,由于受到各种因素干扰,会严重影响图像的视觉效果,进而影响后续处理的准确性。因此,对遥感图像的噪声进行准确地建模是解决遥感图像噪声问题的关键。编码噪声分布最常选择是高斯分布、拉普拉斯分布和高斯混合分布,但它们总是与现实世界的遥感图像噪声不相容。考虑到遥感图像同时存在对称和非对称的噪声分布,本文在高斯混合分布基础上,引入了非对称参数,构建了一个基于非对称高斯混合分布模型(AMoG)的遥感图像去噪算法。该算法使用低秩矩阵分解将遥感图像近似为两个因子矩阵的乘积。对于模型的参数,使用了EM算法进行迭代更新。在合成数据集和真实数据集上的大量实验结果表明,该模型在PSNR、SSIM、FSIM、ERGA、SAM五种评价指标上均表现良好,表明了该算法在遥感图像去噪方面具有一定的优越性。
Abstract: Remote sensing images are often subject to various interferences during acquisition, which seriously affects the visual effect of the images, and then affects the accuracy of subsequent processing. Therefore, accurate modeling of the noise of remote sensing images is the key to solving the noise problem of remote sensing images. The most common choices for coded noise distributions are Gaussian, Laplace, and Gaussian mixtures, but they are always incompatible with real-world remote sensing image noise. Considering that there are both symmetrical and asymmetric noise distribution in remote sensing images, this paper introduces asymmetric parameters on the basis of Gaussian mixed distribution, and constructs a remote sensing image denoising algorithm based on asymmetric Gaussian mixed distribution model (AMoG). The algorithm uses low-rank matrix factorization to approximate the remote sensing image as the product of two-factor matrices. For the parameters of the model, the EM algorithm was used for iterative update. A large number of experimental results on synthetic datasets and real datasets show that the model performs well in five evaluation indexes: PSNR, SSIM, FSIM, ERGA and SAM, indicating that the algorithm has certain advantages in remote sensing image denoising.
文章引用:程绘宇, 贾小宁. 基于非对称高斯混合模型的遥感图像去噪算法[J]. 应用数学进展, 2024, 13(11): 4975-4989. https://doi.org/10.12677/aam.2024.1311480

参考文献

[1] 邹永宁, 姚功杰. 自适应窗口形状的中值滤波[J]. 光学精密工程, 2018, 26(12): 3028-3039.
[2] Rudin, L.I., Osher, S. and Fatemi, E. (1992) Nonlinear Total Variation Based Noise Removal Algorithms. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 60, 259-268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Bredies, K., Kunisch, K. and Pock, T. (2010) Total Generalized Variation. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 3, 492-526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 闫涵, 张旭秀,丁 鸣艳. 一种改进的非局部均值去噪算法[J]. 电子测量技术, 2019, 42(22): 145-149.
[5] Romano, Y. and Elad, M. (2013) Improving K-SVD Denoising by Post-Processing Its Method-Noise. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Melbourne, 15-18 September 2013, 435-439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Dong, W., Zhang, L., Shi, G. and Li, X. (2013) Nonlocally Centralized Sparse Representation for Image Restoration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 22, 1620-1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Gu, S., Zhang, L., Zuo, W. and Feng, X. (2014) Weighted Nuclear Norm Minimization with Application to Image Denoising. 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, 23-28 June 2014, 2862-2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M. and Rubin, D.B. (1977) Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the em Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 39, 1-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Werner, K. and Jansson, M. (2006) Reduced Rank Linear Regression and Weighted Low Rank Approximations. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54, 2063-2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Buchanan, A.M. and Fitzgibbon, A.W. (2005) Damped Newton Algorithms for Matrix Factorization with Missing Data. 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05), San Diego, 20-25 June 2005, 316-322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Okatani, T. and Deguchi, K. (2006) On the Wiberg Algorithm for Matrix Factorization in the Presence of Missing Components. International Journal of Computer Vision, 72, 329-337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Okatani, T., Yoshida, T. and Deguchi, K. (2011) Efficient Algorithm for Low-Rank Matrix Factorization with Missing Components and Performance Comparison of Latest Algorithms. 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, Barcelona, 6-13 November 2011, 842-849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Meng, D. and De la Torre, F. (2013) Robust Matrix Factorization with Unknown Noise. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Sydney, 1-8 December 2013, 1337-1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Cao, X., Chen, Y., Zhao, Q., Meng, D., Wang, Y., Wang, D., et al. (2015) Low-rank Matrix Factorization under General Mixture Noise Distributions. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Santiago, 7-13 December 2015, 1493-1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Chen, Y., Cao, X., Zhao, Q., Meng, D. and Xu, Z. (2018) Denoising Hyperspectral Image with Non-i.i.d. Noise Structure. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 48, 1054-1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Xu, S., Cao, X., Peng, J., Ke, Q., Ma, C. and Meng, D. (2022) Hyperspectral Image Denoising by Asymmetric Noise Modeling. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Wang, Y., Xu, S., Cao, X., Ke, Q., Ji, T. and Zhu, X. (2023) Hyperspectral Denoising Using Asymmetric Noise Modeling Deep Image Prior. Remote Sensing, 15, Article 1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Chen, B., Yang, Z. and Yang, Z. (2018) An Algorithm for Low-Rank Matrix Factorization and Its Applications. Neurocomputing, 275, 1012-1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Xu, S., Zhang, C. and Zhang, J. (2020) Adaptive Quantile Low-Rank Matrix Factorization. Pattern Recognition, 103, Article ID: 107310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Dian, R., Li, S., Fang, L. and Bioucas-Dias, J. (2018) Hyperspectral Image Super-Resolution via Local Low-Rank and Sparse Representations. IGARSS 2018—2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Valencia, 22-27 July 2018, 4003-4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Haeffele, B.D. and Vidal, R. (2020) Structured Low-Rank Matrix Factorization: Global Optimality, Algorithms, and Applications. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 42, 1468-1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Zheng, Y., Huang, T., Zhao, X., Chen, Y. and He, W. (2020) Double-Factor-Regularized Low-Rank Tensor Factorization for Mixed Noise Removal in Hyperspectral Image. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58, 8450-8464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef