电子商务视角下基于局部多项式回归的信息物理系统可靠性模型
Reliability Model of Cyber Physical System Based on Local Polynomial Regression from the Perspective of E-Commerce
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2024.1341796, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 周文倩, 黄嘉悦：贵州大学数学与统计学院，贵州 贵阳；贵大·贵安科创超级计算算力算法应用实验室，贵州 贵阳；杨剑锋：贵大·贵安科创超级计算算力算法应用实验室，贵州 贵阳；南宁师范大学数学与统计学院，广西 南宁
关键词: 电子商务；局部多项式回归；信息物理系统；可靠性模型；E-Commerce； Local Polynomial Regression； Cyber Physical System； Reliability Model
摘要: 随着互联网的高度发展，信息物理系统的可靠性对于电子商务至关重要，因为这些系统支撑着在线交易、数据管理和用户体验。在电子商务视角下，本文提出了一种基于局部多项式回归的信息物理系统可靠性模型，并将其与两种传统的信息物理系统可靠性模型进行比较。此外，对模型中的参数估计采用了最小二乘估计法。最后，基于超级计算机BlueGene/L的系统的真实失效数据，利用jupyter notebook对这3类信息物理系统可靠性模型的性能进行对比分析。通过实验验证表明，局部多项式回归模型的拟合效果与预测能力更好。本文结果为电子商务的可持续发展提供了有力保障。
Abstract: With the high development of the Internet, the reliability of the cyber physical system is critical for e-commerce, as these systems underpin online transactions, data management and user experience. Under the perspective of e-commerce, this paper presents a reliability model of cyber physical system based on local polynomial regression, and compares it with two traditional cyber physical system reliability models. In addition, the least squares estimation method is used to estimate the parameters in the model. Finally, based on the real system failure data of supercomputer BlueGene/L, jupyter notebook is used to compare and analyze the performance of these three types of reliability models of cyber physical system. The experimental results show that the local polynomial regression model has better fitting effect and prediction ability. The results of this paper provide a strong guarantee for the sustainable development of e-commerce.
文章引用：周文倩, 杨剑锋, 黄嘉悦. 电子商务视角下基于局部多项式回归的信息物理系统可靠性模型[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(4): 5587-5594. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.1341796

参考文献

[1] Negi, N. and Chakrabortty, A. (2020) Sparsity-Promoting Optimal Control of Cyber-Physical Systems over Shared Communication Networks. Automatica, 122, Article 109217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Lu, A. and Yang, G. (2020) Observer-Based Control for Cyber-Physical Systems under Denial-of-Service with a Decentralized Event-Triggered Scheme. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 50, 4886-4895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Yang, Y., Huang, J., Su, X. and Deng, B. (2021) Adaptive Control of Cyber-Physical Systems under Deception and Injection Attacks. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 358, 6174-6194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Wang, C., Geng, Q., Liu, F. and Han, M. (2022) Interval Type-2 T-S Fuzzy MPC for CPS under Hybrid Attacks over a Multi-Channel Framework. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 359, 9666-9689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Ge, H., Yue, D., Xie, X., Deng, S. and Dou, C. (2021) A Unified Modeling of Muti-Sources Cyber-Attacks with Uncertainties for CPS Security Control. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 358, 89-113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Lu, Z., Liu, H., Kong, X., Li, H. and Li, T. (2023) Optimal Defense Strategy Selection Method for CPS Considering Integrated Cyber-Physical Losses. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 36, Article 101143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Bo, X., Qu, Z., Liu, Y., Dong, Y., Zhang, Z. and Cui, M. (2022) Review of Active Defense Methods against Power CPS False Data Injection Attacks from the Multiple Spatiotemporal Perspective. Energy Reports, 8, 11235-11248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Li, Y., Yang, Y., Chai, T. and Chen, T. (2022) Stochastic Detection against Deception Attacks in CPS: Performance Evaluation and Game-Theoretic Analysis. Automatica, 144, Article 110461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Zhang, Z., Li, M. and Xie, L. (2024) Data-Driven Replay Attack Detection for Unknown Cyber-Physical Systems. Information Sciences, 670, Article 120562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Ahmed, C.M., Palleti, V.R. and Mishra, V.K. (2022) A Practical Physical Watermarking Approach to Detect Replay Attacks in a CPS. Journal of Process Control, 116, 136-146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Babiceanu, R.F. and Seker, R. (2017) Trustworthiness Requirements for Manufacturing Cyber-Physical Systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 973-981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Alemayehu, T.S. and Kim, J. (2017) Dependability Analysis of Cyber Physical Systems. IET Computers & Digital Techniques, 11, 231-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Lalropuia, K.C. and Gupta, V. (2019) Modeling Cyber-Physical Attacks Based on Stochastic Game and Markov Processes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 181, 28-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Lu, N., Li, Y., Huang, H., Mi, J. and Niazi, S.G. (2023) AGP-MCS+D: An Active Learning Reliability Analysis Method Combining Dependent Gaussian Process and Monte Carlo Simulation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 240, Article 109541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Dui, H., Wang, X., Dong, X., Zhu, T. and Zhai, Y. (2024) Reliability Model and Emergency Maintenance Strategies for Smart Home Systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 251, Article 110402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Wang, L., Lin, L. and Dinh, N. (2024) Trustworthiness Modeling and Evaluation for a Nearly Autonomous Management and Control System. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 245, Article 110008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Wang, X., Wang, B.X., Jiang, P.H. and Hong, Y. (2020) Accurate Reliability Inference Based on Wiener Process with Random Effects for Degradation Data. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 193, Article 106631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Xing, L., Zhao, G., Xiang, Y. and Liu, Q. (2021) A Behavior‐Driven Reliability Modeling Method for Complex Smart Systems. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 37, 2065-2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Ding, J. and Zhang, Z. (2021) Statistical Inference on Uncertain Nonparametric Regression Model. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 20, 451-469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] Dong, H., Otsu, T. and Taylor, L. (2023) Bandwidth Selection for Nonparametric Regression with Errors-in-Variables. Econometric Reviews, 42, 393-419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐