基于双固定效应模型研究ESG评级分歧对股票定价效率的影响
Study on the Impact of ESG Rating Divergences on Stock Pricing Efficiency Based on a Double Fixed Effects Model
摘要: 近些年来,在全球范围内,政府和监管机构越来越强调ESG标准。随着国家对可持续发展的重视,越来越多的上市公司开始披露ESG信息,各种评级机构也开始出现,上市公司因此拥有多个ESG评级,这会对股价定价效率产生影响。本文运用中国A股上市公司2018年~2023年的数据样本,使用时间、行业双固定效应模型来考察ESG评级分歧与股票定价效率的关系。研究发现,ESG评级分歧显著增加了股价同步性,降低了股票定价效率。此外,机制检验结果表明ESG评级分歧的增大会使上市公司年报语调变得消极,进而降低股票定价效率。本文的结论证明建立统一的ESG标准很有必要,它可以确保企业提供一致、透明的信息,使投资者更清楚地了解各企业在环境、社会和治理方面的表现,进而做出更明智的投资决策,推动股票定价效率的提升。
Abstract: In recent years, governments and regulatory bodies worldwide have increasingly emphasized ESG standards. With the growing national focus on sustainable development, more publicly listed companies have begun disclosing ESG information, and various rating agencies have emerged. As a result, companies often have multiple ESG ratings, which can impact stock pricing efficiency. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2018 to 2023, this paper employs a time- and industry-fixed effects model to investigate the relationship between ESG rating divergences and stock pricing efficiency. The study finds that ESG rating divergences significantly increase stock price synchronicity and reduce stock pricing efficiency. Furthermore, mechanism testing reveals that increased ESG rating divergences lead to a more negative tone in annual reports, further diminishing stock pricing efficiency. The findings of this study highlight the necessity of establishing a unified ESG standard, ensuring consistent and transparent information disclosure from companies. This would enable investors to better understand the environmental, social, and governance performance of different firms, make more informed investment decisions, and improve stock pricing efficiency.
文章引用:徐一博, 徐佳文. 基于双固定效应模型研究ESG评级分歧对股票定价效率的影响[J]. 理论数学, 2024, 14(11): 212-228. https://doi.org/10.12677/pm.2024.1411390

参考文献

[1] 袁蓉丽, 江纳, 刘梦瑶. ESG研究综述与展望[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(17): 128-134.
[2] Berg, F., Kölbel, J.F. and Rigobon, R. (2022) Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. Review of Finance, 26, 1315-1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Kimbrough, M.D., Wang, X., Wei, S. and Zhang, J. (2022) Does Voluntary ESG Reporting Resolve Disagreement among ESG Rating Agencies? European Accounting Review, 33, 15-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Christensen, D.M., Serafeim, G. and Sikochi, A. (2021) Why Is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of the Beholder? the Case of ESG Ratings. The Accounting Review, 97, 147-175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Lopez, C., Contreras, O. and Bendix, J. (2020) Disagreement among ESG Rating Agencies: Shall We Be Worried? MPRAPaper.
[6] Abhayawansa, S. and Tyagi, S. (2021) Sustainable Investing: The Black Box of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Ratings. The Journal of Wealth Management, 24, 49-54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Christensen, D.M., Serafeim, G. and Sikochi, A. (2021) Why Is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of the Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings. The Accounting Review, 97, 147-175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Chatterji, A.K., Durand, R., Levine, D.I. and Touboul, S. (2015) Do Ratings of Firms Converge? Implications for Managers, Investors and Strategy Researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 1597-1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 刘向强, 杨晴晴, 胡珺. 企业ESG表现对股价同步性的影响[J]. 中国软科学, 2023(8): 108-120.
[10] Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A. and Tarelli, A. (2022) Sustainable Investing with ESG Rating Uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 145, 642-664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Roll, R. (1988) R2. The Journal of Finance, 43, 541-566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Morck, R., Yeung, B. and Yu, W. (2000) The Information Content of Stock Markets: Why Do Emerging Markets Have Synchronous Stock Price Movements? Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 215-260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 王亚平, 刘慧龙, 吴联生. 信息透明度、机构投资者与股价同步性[J]. 金融研究, 2009(12): 162-174.
[14] Jin, L. and Myers, S. (2006) R2 around the World: New Theory and New Tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 257-292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] French, K.R. and Roll, R. (1986) Stock Return Variances: The Arrival of Information and the Reaction of Traders. Journal of Financial Economics, 17, 5-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 游家兴, 汪立琴. 机构投资者, 公司特质信息与股价波动同步性——基于R2的研究视角[J]. 南方经济, 2012, 30(11): 89-101.
[17] Piotroski, J.D. and Roulstone, D.T. (2004) The Influence of Analysts, Institutional Investors, and Insiders on the Incorporation of Market, Industry, and Firm-Specific Information into Stock Prices. The Accounting Review, 79, 1119-1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 陈宏韬, 殷海锋, 张天舒, 黄俊. ESG评级分歧影响资本市场定价效率吗?——基于上市公司股价同步性的研究[J/OL]. 财经研究, 2024.
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=YMwpULBJqz4H4P1JVNtE88CB9Z6pp7pT3FENmc0sewjAMTWzTp71aMGujSsMYkPHaVYV3uCxEJbbCelD_lDPdYQGc_PPnoeKeyHvhpGu7UNjwnao1He5sMKyi3miVWCv8fOwyh_eVYJNtx-PHSml_f1huW3hYwm3UnJNPFKfxcVeOEcyI-o9ypOi44S3QpLQ&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS, 2024-07-15.
[19] Xu, N., Liu, J. and Dou, H. (2022) Environmental, Social, and Governance Information Disclosure and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 977369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 史永, 张龙平. XBRL财务报告实施效果研究——基于股价同步性的视角[J]. 会计研究, 2014(3): 3-10, 95.
[21] 周泽将, 谷文菁, 伞子瑶. ESG评级分歧与分析师盈余预测准确性[J]. 中国软科学, 2023(10): 164-176.
[22] 徐高彦, 高歌. 分析师预测分歧是市场情绪洪流的“漫水桥”吗: 基于股价崩盘风险的视角[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2022(2): 52-67.
[23] 朱红军, 何贤杰, 陶林. 中国的证券分析师能够提高资本市场的效率吗——基于股价同步性和股价信息含量的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2007(2): 110-121.
[24] 徐祥兵, 乔鹏程, 黄沁. ESG责任表现能传递更透明的信息吗? [J]. 产业经济评论, 2023(2): 5-21.
[25] 张延良, 崔海涛, 孙晓慧. 媒体关注对股票定价效率影响研究[J]. 投资研究, 2022, 41(9): 143-158.
[26] 钟覃琳, 陆正飞. 资本市场开放能提高股价信息含量吗?——基于“沪港通”效应的实证检验[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(1): 169-179.
[27] 黄俊, 郭照蕊. 新闻媒体报道与资本市场定价效率——基于股价同步性的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2014(5): 121-130.
[28] 曾庆生, 周波, 张程, 陈信元. 年报语调与内部人交易: “表里如一”还是“口是心非”? [J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(9): 143-160.
[29] 伊志宏, 杨圣之, 陈钦源. 分析师能降低股价同步性吗: 基于研究报告文本分析的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(1): 156-173.
[30] 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 100-120.
[31] 谢德仁, 林乐. 管理层语调能预示公司未来业绩吗?——基于我国上市公司年度业绩说明会的文本分析[J]. 会计研究, 2015(2): 20-27, 93.
[32] 余海宗, 朱慧娟. 年报语调、分析师跟踪与股价同步性[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2021(10): 59-67.
[33] 王化成, 张修平, 侯粲然, 李昕宇. 企业战略差异与权益资本成本: 基于经营风险和信息不对称的中介效应研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2017(9): 99-113.
[34] 何贤杰, 王孝钰, 孙淑伟, 等. 网络新媒体信息披露的经济后果研究——基于股价同步性的视角[J]. 管理科学学报, 2018, 21(6): 43-59.
[35] 徐寿福, 徐龙炳. 信息披露质量与资本市场估值偏误[J]. 会计研究, 2015(1): 40-47, 96.