抗滑桩加固边坡物理模型试验研究进展
Research Progress of Physical Model Test on Slope Reinforcement by Anti-Slide Pile
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2024.1312243, PDF,   
作者: 陈自炫*#, 李 冲:华北水利水电大学地球科学与工程学院,河南 郑州;赵玉凯:中国电建集团贵阳勘测设计研究院有限公司,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 抗滑桩支护边坡物理模型实验地震响应边坡破坏Anti-Slide Pile Supporting Slope Physical Model Test Seismic Response Slope Failure
摘要: 目的:为了分析抗滑桩加固边坡的研究现状,厘清抗滑桩加固边坡的作用机制及效果,文章综述了国内外关于抗滑桩加固边坡物理模型试验的文献。方法:首先,在静力、振动、离心受力作用下阐述了抗滑桩加固边坡模型试验的过程,并分析了不同类型抗滑桩在不同岩土体边坡中的作用机制及受力情况;其次,对比分析三类模型试验的优缺点;最后,探究了锚索抗滑桩组合体系在边坡支护中的作用机制及优点。结果:结果表明:抗滑桩加固边坡稳定性高,效果好,锚索抗滑桩组合体系能减小桩身弯矩。结论:三类模型试验均有明显缺点,需要加强模型试验中相似材料的选取、施加荷载途径的优化、监测仪器的精准度,以保证更准确地还原边坡变形破坏的实际过程,获取更有参考意义的实验结论和规律。
Abstract: Purposes: In order to analyze the research status of slope reinforcement by anti-slide pile and clarify the mechanism and effect of slope reinforcement by anti-slide pile, the literature on the physical model test of slope reinforcement by anti-slide pile at home and abroad is reviewed. Method: Firstly, the model test process of slope reinforcement by anti-slide piles under static, vibration, and centrifugal forces is described, and the action mechanism and force of different types of anti-slide piles in different rock and soil slopes are analyzed. Secondly, the advantages and disadvantages of the three model tests are compared and analyzed. Finally, the action mechanism and advantages of the combined system of anchor cable anti-slide pile in slope support are discussed. Findings: The results show that anti-slide pile reinforcement has high stability and good effect, and the combination system of anchor cable anti-slide pile can reduce the pile bending moment. Conclusions: The three types of model tests have obvious shortcomings. It is necessary to strengthen the selection of similar materials in the model test, the optimization of loading channels, and the accuracy of monitoring instruments so as to ensure that the actual process of slope deformation and failure can be more accurately restored, and more meaningful experimental conclusions and rules can be obtained.
文章引用:陈自炫, 李冲, 赵玉凯. 抗滑桩加固边坡物理模型试验研究进展[J]. 土木工程, 2024, 13(12): 2207-2214. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2024.1312243

参考文献

[1] 王恭先, 徐峻龄, 刘光代, 等. 滑坡学与滑坡防治技术[M]. 北京: 中国铁道科学出版社, 2004.
[2] 宋英杰, 陈文强, 李长冬. 抗滑桩加固后边坡稳定性评价与桩位优化研究进展[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2016, 23(5): 43-49+54.
[3] 李阳, 南亚林, 贺海超, 张鹏. 黄土双排抗滑桩模型试验[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2022, 22(3): 1315-1322.
[4] 景彬余, 温树杰. 抗滑桩加固红砂岩风化土路基边坡模型试验[J]. 桂林理工大学学报, 2022, 42(1): 109-114.
[5] 欧孝夺, 唐迎春, 崔伟, 李结全, 潘鑫. h型抗滑桩模型试验及数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(9): 1936-1943.
[6] 时步炯, 郑静, 吕昌明, 安孟康. 组合板抗滑桩抗滑特性模型试验研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2017, 57(10): 96-100.
[7] 邓明园, 杨泉, 肖世国, 李安洪. 高路堤承台式抗滑桩力学行为的模型试验[J]. 应用力学学报, 2024.
[8] Zhang, C., Jiang, G., Lei, D., Asghar, A., Su, L. and Wang, Z. (2020) Large-Scale Shaking Table Test on Seismic Behaviour of Anti-Slide Pile-Reinforced Bridge Foundation and Gravel Landslide: A Case Study. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 80, 1303-1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Wu, H. and Pai, L. (2022) Shaking Table Test for Reinforcement of Soil Slope with Multiple Sliding Surfaces by Reinforced Double-Row Anti-Slide Piles. Journal of Mountain Science, 19, 1419-1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Lai, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Y. and Xu, J.B. (2024) Experimental Study on Seismic Characteristics of Slope Supported by Long-Short Composite Anti-Slide Piles. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 15137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 姚爱军, 史高平, 梅超. 悬臂抗滑桩加固边坡地震动力响应模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(S2): 53-58.
[12] Zhang, H., Xing, H., Xue, D. and Tannant, D. (2023) Centrifuge and Numerical Modeling of H-Type Anti-Slide Pile Reinforced Soil-Rock Mixture Slope. Journal of Mountain Science, 20, 1441-1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Zhang, C., Yin, Y., Yan, H., Zhu, S., Zhang, M. and Wang, L. (2024) Centrifuge Modeling of Unreinforced and Multi-Row Stabilizing Piles Reinforced Landslides Subjected to Reservoir Water Level Fluctuation. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 16, 1600-1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 孙志亮, 孔令伟, 郭爱国. 下伏基岩堆积体边坡抗滑桩加固前后地震响应特征离心模型试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(6): 1413-1423.
[15] 王成汤, 王浩, 张玉丰, 覃卫民, 闵弘. 锚索抗滑桩加固堆积型滑坡的受力特性模型试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3343-3354.
[16] 周云涛, 石胜伟, 蔡强, 李乾坤, 王林峰. 预应力锚索修复变形抗滑桩模型试验与数值模拟分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2020, 31(3): 58-64.
[17] 王贵华, 李长冬, 贺鑫, 张永权, 姚文敏, 宋成彬, 张华伟. 不同布锚方式对锚索抗滑桩受力与变形影响的物理模型试验研究[J]. 地质科技通报, 2022, 41(6): 262-277+315.
[18] 桑伟宁, 江山. 锚索抗滑桩在高边坡支护中的应用[J]. 黑龙江交通科技, 2021, 44(10): 60-61+63.
[19] 王宇, 郑桐, 孙锐, 齐文浩, 李领贵, 程阳, 张一鸣. 不同布锚角度锚索抗滑桩抗震性能的离心振动台试验对比[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023, 45(S2): 110-115.
[20] 郭鹏辉. 高速公路顺层边坡锚索框架梁和抗滑桩联合支护体系变形特征研究[J]. 路基工程, 2024(1): 60-66.