碳交易试点政策对碳市场企业产出的影响
The Impact of Carbon Trading Pilot Policies on Firm Output in Carbon Markets
摘要: 碳排放权交易在中国的绿色发展路径探索中占据重要地位,其政策效果备受关注。本文通过手工整理匹配中国碳交易试点地区的控排企业名单与税收调查数据,从理论和实际两个角度测算企业生产效率,评估碳交易政策效果。理论上,通过非参数环境生产技术模型测算各个碳市场在命令控制型和市场交易型两种模型假设下的企业潜在产出及变动比重,发现市场交易模型中的潜在产出水平更高,控排企业在碳市场中资源配置效率提升、经济潜力更大;实际效果采用倾向得分匹配–双重差分法(PSM-DID)评估,结果发现不同碳市场的政策效应具有显著异质性,上海、深圳碳市场出现短期负效应,反映出市场设立初期对企业造成一定的生产和减排压力;但广东碳市场显示政策有效,表明碳试点政策有助于提升企业生产效率。总的来看,碳交易政策能够实现理论上更高的企业产出,但实际情况中不同碳市场的政策效果各不相同。
Abstract: Carbon emissions trading plays a pivotal role in China’s exploration of a green development path, and its policy effects have garnered significant attention. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of carbon trading policies by manually matching the list of emission-controlled enterprises in China’s carbon trading pilot regions with tax survey data and examining firm production efficiency from both theoretical and practical perspectives. Theoretically, by employing a non-parametric environmental production technology model, we estimate the potential output and its changing proportion of firms under two hypothetical models: command-and-control and market-based trading, in various carbon markets. The results reveal higher potential output levels in the market-based trading model, indicating improved resource allocation efficiency and greater economic potential for emission-controlled firms in carbon markets. For practical effects, we use the PSM-DID method to assess policy impacts and find significant heterogeneity in policy effects across different carbon markets. Short-term negative effects emerge in the Shanghai and Shenzhen carbon markets, reflecting initial production and emission reduction pressures on firms during the market’s establishment. However, the Guangdong carbon market demonstrates policy effectiveness, suggesting that carbon pilot policies can enhance firm production efficiency. Overall, carbon trading policies can theoretically achieve higher firm output, but the policy effects vary in practice across different carbon markets.
文章引用:沈妮. 碳交易试点政策对碳市场企业产出的影响[J]. 世界经济探索, 2024, 13(4): 468-479. https://doi.org/10.12677/wer.2024.134053

参考文献

[1] 刘海英, 王钰. 用能权与碳排放权可交易政策组合下的经济红利效应[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2019, 29(5): 1-10.
[2] Wang, X., Huang, J. and Liu, H. (2022) Can China’s Carbon Trading Policy Help Achieve Carbon Neutrality? A Study of Policy Effects from the Five-Sphere Integrated Plan Perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 305, Article ID: 114357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Feng, X., Zhao, Y. and Yan, R. (2024) Does Carbon Emission Trading Policy Has Emission Reduction Effect? An Empirical Study Based on Quasi-Natural Experiment Method. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, Article ID: 119791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 王喜平, 王素静. 碳交易政策对我国钢铁行业碳排放效率的影响[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(1): 171-176.
[5] 宋德勇, 朱文博, 王班班. 中国碳交易试点覆盖企业的微观实证: 碳排放权交易、配额分配方法与企业绿色创新[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2021, 31(1): 37-47.
[6] 张国兴, 樊萌萌, 马睿琨, 林伟纯. 碳交易政策的协同减排效应[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2022, 32(3): 1-10.
[7] Daskalakis, G. and Markellos, R.N. (2008) Are the European Carbon Markets Efficient. Review of Futures Markets, 17, 103-128.
[8] 刘传明, 孙喆, 张瑾. 中国碳排放权交易试点的碳减排政策效应研究[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2019, 29(11): 49-58.
[9] Pan, X., Pu, C., Yuan, S. and Xu, H. (2022) Effect of Chinese Pilots Carbon Emission Trading Scheme on Enterprises’ Total Factor Productivity: The Moderating Role of Government Participation and Carbon Trading Market Efficiency. Journal of Environmental Management, 316, Article ID: 115228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Xiao, J., Li, G., Zhu, B., Xie, L., Hu, Y. and Huang, J. (2021) Evaluating the Impact of Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme on Chinese Firms’ Total Factor Productivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 306, Article ID: 127104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 胡珺, 方祺, 龙文滨. 碳排放规制、企业减排激励与全要素生产率——基于中国碳排放权交易机制的自然实验[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(4): 77-94.
[12] Chen, L. and Wang, K. (2022) The Spatial Spillover Effect of Low-Carbon City Pilot Scheme on Green Efficiency in China’s Cities: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment. Energy Economics, 110, Article ID: 106018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 任晓松, 马茜, 刘宇佳, 赵国浩. 碳交易政策对工业碳生产率的影响及传导机制[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(11): 5427-5437.
[14] Lin, X., Zhu, X., Han, Y., Geng, Z. and Liu, L. (2020) Economy and Carbon Dioxide Emissions Effects of Energy Structures in the World: Evidence Based on SBM-DEA Model. Science of The Total Environment, 729, Article ID: 138947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 徐英启, 程钰, 王晶晶. 中国资源型城市碳排放效率时空演变与绿色技术创新影响[J]. 地理研究, 2023, 42(3): 878-894.
[16] Ding, J., Liu, B. and Shao, X. (2022) Spatial Effects of Industrial Synergistic Agglomeration and Regional Green Development Efficiency: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 112, Article ID: 106156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and Pasurka, C.A. (2013) Tradable Permits and Unrealized Gains from Trade. Energy Economics, 40, 416-424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 涂正革, 谌仁俊. 排污权交易机制在中国能否实现波特效应? [J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(7): 160-173.