村庄空间开发强度与景观格局的耦合关系研究
Coupling Relationship between Village Spatial Development Intensity and Landscape Pattern
DOI: 10.12677/gser.2024.136095, PDF,   
作者: 张博航*：曼彻斯特大学自然科学学院，英国 曼彻斯特；周佳涵：合肥工业大学城市规划系，安徽 合肥
关键词: 村庄空间开发强度；景观格局；耦合关系；安徽省；Village Spatial Development Intensity； Landscape Pattern； Coupling Relationship； Anhui Province
摘要: 分析村庄空间开发强度与景观格局的耦合关系对村庄国土空间开发保护具有重大意义。综合应用村庄空间开发强度指数、景观格局指数、双变量空间自相关模型、耦合度与耦合协调度模型等方法，构建了分析村庄空间开发强度与景观格局耦合关系的技术方法。以安徽省100个村庄为例，分析了安徽省村庄空间开发强度与景观格局的耦合关系，结果显示：村庄开发强度与景观格局的空间耦合关系主要表现为高–高聚类和低–高聚类，皖北平原村庄耦合协调发展状态最佳。只有皖西山区和皖北平原村庄的景观格局与多个空间开发强度指标之间存在显著的多元线性关系。研究结果可为村庄国土空间开发保护、村庄规划编制提供理论方法参考和实践应用借鉴。
Abstract: Analysing the coupling relationship between spatial development intensity and landscape pattern is of great significance for the development and protection of village land resources. The technical method for analysing the coupling relationship between village spatial development intensity and landscape pattern is constructed based on the methods of village spatial development intensity model, landscape pattern index, bivariate spatial autocorrelation model, coupling degree and coupling coordination degree model. Taking 100 villages in Anhui Province, China as an example, the coupling characteristics of village spatial development intensity and landscape pattern are analysed. The spatial coupling relationship between village spatial development intensity and landscape pattern is mainly characterised by high-high clustering and low-high clustering. The coupling coordinated development of villages in the Northern Anhui plain region is the best. There is only a significant multi-linear relationship between village landscape pattern and multiple spatial development intensity indicators in Western Anhui mountainous region and Northern Anhui plain region. The research results can provide theoretical method and practical application reference for village land space development and protection and village planning.
文章引用：张博航, 周佳涵. 村庄空间开发强度与景观格局的耦合关系研究[J]. 地理科学研究, 2024, 13(6): 993-1002. https://doi.org/10.12677/gser.2024.136095

参考文献

[1] Huang, X., Huang, X., Liu, M., Wang, B. and Zhao, Y. (2020) Spatial-Temporal Dynamics and Driving Forces of Land Development Intensity in the Western China from 2000 to 2015. Chinese Geographical Science, 30, 16-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Erb, K., Haberl, H., Jepsen, M.R., Kuemmerle, T., Lindner, M., Müller, D., et al. (2013) A Conceptual Framework for Analysing and Measuring Land-Use Intensity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 464-470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Ratnayake, S.S., Reid, M., Larder, N., Hunter, D., Ranagalage, M., Kogo, B., et al. (2024) Knowing the Lay of the Land: Changes to Land Use and Cover and Landscape Pattern in Village Tank Cascade Systems of Sri Lanka. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, Article No. 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] 吴大放, 胡悦, 刘艳艳, 等. 城市开发强度与资源环境承载力协调分析——以珠三角为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 82-94.
[5] Palmero-Iniesta, M., Espelta, J.M., Gordillo, J. and Pino, J. (2020) Changes in Forest Landscape Patterns Resulting from Recent Afforestation in Europe (1990-2012): Defragmentation of Pre-Existing Forest versus New Patch Proliferation. Annals of Forest Science, 77, Article No. 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Zhao, Y.L. and Liu, Y.Z. (2013) Diffidence and Influencing Factors of Urban Land Development Intensity across 222 Cities in China. Resources Science, 35, 380-387.
[7] Shuai, N., Hu, Y., Chen, J., Liu, X. and Bai, Y. (2024) Does Ecological Network Affect the Construction Land Spatial Development Intensity? An Empirical Study Based on the Main Urban Area of Jinan, China. Ecological Informatics, 81, Article ID: 102609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] 李广东, 戚伟. 中国建设用地扩张对景观格局演化的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2572-2591.
[9] 沈春竹, 谭琦川, 王丹阳, 等. 基于资源环境承载力与开发建设适宜性的国土开发强度研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(6): 1276-1286.
[10] Dooley, J.M. and Brown, M.T. (2019) The Quantitative Relation between Ambient Soundscapes and Landscape Development Intensity in North Central Florida. Landscape Ecology, 35, 113-127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] 黄孟勤, 李阳兵, 李明珍, 等. 三峡库区人类活动强度与景观格局的耦合响应[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(10): 3959-3973.
[12] Kaza, N. (2024) Multiclass Compactness Index for Urban Areas. The Professional Geographer, 76, 532-542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Ma, L., Bo, J., Li, X., Fang, F. and Cheng, W. (2019) Identifying Key Landscape Pattern Indices Influencing the Ecological Security of Inland River Basin: The Middle and Lower Reaches of Shule River Basin as an Example. Science of the Total Environment, 674, 424-438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Martínez Batlle, J.R. and van der Hoek, Y. (2018) Clusters of High Abundance of Plants Detected from Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA) in a Semi-Deciduous Tropical Forest. PLOS ONE, 13, e0208780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 马海涛, 张雪莹, 梁源钊, 等. 东北地区黑土保护与区域发展综合评价及耦合协调研究[J]. 地理科学, 2023, 43(12): 2183-2195.

为你推荐