刺激呈现方式对类别学习的影响
Effects of Stimulus Presentation on Category Learning
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2024.13121124, PDF,   
作者: 路江虹：福建师范大学心理学院，福建 福州
关键词: 交错呈现；集中呈现；类别学习；Interleaved Presentation； Blocked Presentation； Category Learning
摘要: 类别学习是通过不断的分类练习，学会如何将类别刺激进行归类的过程。而刺激的呈现方式作为一种学习的促进方法，对类别学习具有重要作用。基于已有研究，文章分别梳理了集中呈现和交错呈现对类别学习的影响。目前，两种呈现方式对类别学习的影响是否达成一致还存在争议。此外，两种呈现方式影响类别学习的认知加工机制尚不清晰。未来的研究还需明确刺激呈现方式对类别学习的影响，进一步验证刺激呈现方式影响类别学习的认知加工阶段假设的合理性。
Abstract: Category learning is the process of learning how to categorize category stimuli through continuous categorization practice. The way stimuli are presented plays an important role in category learning. Based on existing studies, the effects of blocked presentation and interleaved presentation on category learning have been sorted out separately. At present, it is controversial whether there is agreement on the effect of the two presentation methods on category learning. In addition, the cognitive processing mechanisms by which the two presentation methods affect category learning are not clear. Future research is needed to clarify the effects of stimulus presentation on category learning and further verify the plausibility of the hypothesis that stimulus presentation affects the cognitive processing stages of category learning.
文章引用：路江虹. 刺激呈现方式对类别学习的影响[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2024, 13(12): 435-441. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2024.13121124

参考文献

[1] Coutinho, M.V.C., Couchman, J.J., Redford, J.S. and David Smith, J. (2010) Refining the Visual-Cortical Hypothesis in Category Learning. Brain and Cognition, 74, 88-96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Kruschke, J.K. (1992) ALCOVE: An Exemplar-Based Connectionist Model of Category Learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Ashby, F.G. and Maddox, W.T. (2005) Human Category Learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 149-178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Ashby, F.G., Alfonso-Reese, L.A., Turken, A.U. and Waldron, E.M. (1998) A Neuropsychological Theory of Multiple Systems in Category Learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442-481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Maddox, W.T., Ashby, F.G. and Bohil, C.J. (2003) Delayed Feedback Effects on Rule-Based and Information-Integration Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 650-662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Birnbaum, M.S., Kornell, N., Bjork, E.L. and Bjork, R.A. (2012) Why Interleaving Enhances Inductive Learning: The Roles of Discrimination and Retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 41, 392-402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Carvalho, P.F. and Goldstone, R.L. (2017) The Sequence of Study Changes What Information Is Attended to, Encoded, and Remembered during Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1699-1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Kornell, N., Castel, A.D., Eich, T.S. and Bjork, R.A. (2010) Spacing as the Friend of Both Memory and Induction in Young and Older Adults. Psychology and Aging, 25, 498-503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Rohrer, D. (2012) Interleaving Helps Students Distinguish among Similar Concepts. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 355-367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Sana, F., Yan, V.X., Kim, J.A., Bjork, E.L. and Bjork, R.A. (2018) Does Working Memory Capacity Moderate the Interleaving Benefit? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7, 361-369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Kornell, N. and Bjork, R.A. (2008) Learning Concepts and Categories: Is Spacing the “Enemy of Induction”. Psychological Science, 19, 585-592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Whitehead, P.S., Zamary, A. and Marsh, E.J. (2021) Transfer of Category Learning to Impoverished Contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 1035-1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Zulkiply, N. and Burt, J.S. (2012) The Exemplar Interleaving Effect in Inductive Learning: Moderation by the Difficulty of Category Discriminations. Memory & Cognition, 41, 16-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Carpenter, S.K. and Mueller, F.E. (2013) The Effects of Interleaving versus Blocking on Foreign Language Pronunciation Learning. Memory & Cognition, 41, 671-682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Tauber, S.K., Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K.A., Wahlheim, C.N. and Jacoby, L.L. (2012) Self-Regulated Learning of a Natural Category: Do People Interleave or Block Exemplars during Study? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 356-363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Vlach, H.A., Sandhofer, C.M. and Kornell, N. (2008) The Spacing Effect in Children’s Memory and Category Induction. Cognition, 109, 163-167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K.A., Marsh, E.J., Nathan, M.J. and Willingham, D.T. (2013) Improving Students’ Learning with Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions from Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Kang, S.H.K. and Pashler, H. (2011) Learning Painting Styles: Spacing Is Advantageous When It Promotes Discriminative Contrast. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 97-103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Wahlheim, C.N., Dunlosky, J. and Jacoby, L.L. (2011) Spacing Enhances the Learning of Natural Concepts: An Investigation of Mechanisms, Metacognition, and Aging. Memory & Cognition, 39, 750-763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Eglington, L.G. and Kang, S.H.K. (2017) Interleaved Presentation Benefits Science Category Learning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 475-485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Flesch, T., Balaguer, J., Dekker, R., Nili, H. and Summerfield, C. (2018) Comparing Continual Task Learning in Minds and Machines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, E10313-E10322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Baddeley, A.D., Thomson, N. and Buchanan, M. (1975) Word Length and the Structure of Short-Term Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575-589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] Goldstone, R.L. (1996) Isolated and Interrelated Concepts. Memory & Cognition, 24, 608-628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Carvalho, P.F. and Goldstone, R.L. (2013) Putting Category Learning in Order: Category Structure and Temporal Arrangement Affect the Benefit of Interleaved over Blocked Study. Memory & Cognition, 42, 481-495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Rawson, K.A., Thomas, R.C. and Jacoby, L.L. (2014) The Power of Examples: Illustrative Examples Enhance Conceptual Learning of Declarative Concepts. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 483-504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Noh, S.M., Yan, V.X., Bjork, R.A. and Maddox, W.T. (2016) Optimal Sequencing during Category Learning: Testing a Dual-Learning Systems Perspective. Cognition, 155, 23-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Carvalho, P.F. and Goldstone, R.L. (2014) The Benefits of Interleaved and Blocked Study: Different Tasks Benefit from Different Schedules of Study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 281-288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Kim, S. and Rehder, B. (2010) How Prior Knowledge Affects Selective Attention during Category Learning: An Eyetracking Study. Memory & Cognition, 39, 649-665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Wu, J. and Fu, Q. (2021) The Role of Working Memory and Visual Processing in Prototype Category Learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 94, 103176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Zeithamova, D. and Maddox, W.T. (2007) The Role of Visuospatial and Verbal Working Memory in Perceptual Category Learning. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1380-1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Wang, J., Liu, Z., Xing, Q. and Seger, C.A. (2020) The Benefit of Interleaved Presentation in Category Learning Is Independent of Working Memory. Memory, 28, 285-292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Yan, V.X. and Sana, F. (2021) The Robustness of the Interleaving Benefit. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10, 589-602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] Molholm, S., Ritter, W., Murray, M.M., Javitt, D.C., Schroeder, C.E. and Foxe, J.J. (2002) Multisensory Auditory-Visual Interactions during Early Sensory Processing in Humans: A High-Density Electrical Mapping Study. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 115-128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Broadbent, H., Osborne, T., Mareschal, D. and Kirkham, N. (2020) Are Two Cues Always Better than One? The Role of Multiple Intra-Sensory Cues Compared to Multi-Cross-Sensory Cues in Children’s Incidental Category Learning. Cognition, 199, Article ID: 104202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Broadbent, H.J., Osborne, T., Mareschal, D. and Kirkham, N.Z. (2018) Withstanding the Test of Time: Multisensory Cues Improve the Delayed Retention of Incidental Learning. Developmental Science, 22, e12726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Broadbent, H.J., Osborne, T., Rea, M., Peng, A., Mareschal, D. and Kirkham, N.Z. (2018) Incidental Category Learning and Cognitive Load in a Multisensory Environment across Childhood. Developmental Psychology, 54, 1020-1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Broadbent, H.J., White, H., Mareschal, D. and Kirkham, N.Z. (2017) Incidental Learning in a Multisensory Environment across Childhood. Developmental Science, 21, e12554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Kirkham, N.Z., Rea, M., Osborne, T., White, H. and Mareschal, D. (2019) Do Cues from Multiple Modalities Support Quicker Learning in Primary Schoolchildren? Developmental Psychology, 55, 2048-2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Wu, J., Li, Q., Fu, Q., Rose, M. and Jing, L. (2021) Multisensory Information Facilitates the Categorization of Untrained Stimuli. Multisensory Research, 35, 79-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

为你推荐