EICP修复Cu2+污染液的影响因素
The Influence Factors of Remediation of Cu2+ Contaminated Solution by EICP
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2024.1312254, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 段雨蓬*, 曾 晨, 陆海军, 陈 维:武汉轻工大学土木工程与建筑学院,湖北 武汉;郑志善:武汉市政工程设计研究院有限责任公司,湖北 武汉
关键词: 重金属污染EICP铜污染重金属修复影响因素Heavy Metal Pollution EICP Copper Pollution Heavy Metal Remediation Influence Factors
摘要: 我国铜污染问题日益严峻,亟需环保高效的修复方法予以处理。脲酶诱导碳酸盐沉淀(Enzyme Induced Carbonate Precipitation, EICP)技术作为新型生物修复技术在重金属修复领域被广泛关注,但是对特定重金属污染(例如铜、镉等)的修复研究匮乏。文章采用EICP技术开展了一系列Cu2+污染液修复的试验研究,通过pH值、Cu2+修复率、Ca2+沉淀率、总沉淀量等修复指标,探究了EICP技术对Cu2+污染液的修复效果;分析了Cu2+污染液中Cu2+初始浓度、氯化钙浓度、脲酶提取液体积、修复时间等因素对修复效果的影响规律。结果表明:在一定条件下,EICP技术对Cu2+污染液的修复率最高可达40.03%;降低Cu2+初始浓度、增加脲酶提取液体积、适当提高氯化钙浓度、控制修复时间等均能促进铜离子污染的修复反应,其中污染液的Cu2+初始浓度为600 mg/L、脲酶提取液体积为20 mL、氯化钙浓度为1.6 mol/L、修复时间为12 h时,铜离子污染的修复效果更好,经济性更优。
Abstract: The copper pollution problem is becoming more and more serious in our country, which urgently needs environmental and efficient remediation methods to deal with it. Although the Enzyme Induced Carbonate Precipitation (EICP) technology has gained significant attention in the field of heavy metal remediation as a novel bioremediation technique, research on the remediation of specific heavy metal contaminants such as copper and cadmium are still deficient. A series of experimental studies were conducted in this paper utilizing EICP technology to remediate Cu2+ contaminated solution. The remediation efficiency of EICP on Cu2+ contaminated solution was investigated through remediation indicators, including pH value, Cu2+ removal ratio, Ca2+ precipitation ratio, and total precipitation amount. Additionally, the influence of factors such as the initial Cu2+ concentration in the contaminated solution, calcium chloride concentration, volume of urease extract, and remediation duration on the remediation efficiency was analyzed. The results indicate that under certain conditions, the Cu2+ removal ratio from contaminated solutions by EICP can reach a maximum value of 40.03%. Lowering the initial Cu2+ concentration, increasing the volume of urease extract, moderately enhancing the calcium chloride concentration, and controlling the remediation duration facilitate the remediation reaction of copper ion pollution. Specifically, the optimal remediation and better economy are found with the combination of 600 mg/L initial Cu2+ concentration in the contaminated solution, 20 mL urease extract, 1.6 mol/L calcium chloride concentration, and 12 hours remediation duration.
文章引用:段雨蓬, 曾晨, 陆海军, 陈维, 郑志善. EICP修复Cu2+污染液的影响因素[J]. 土木工程, 2024, 13(12): 2314-2322. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2024.1312254

参考文献

[1] 李军, 梁永平, 邹胜章, 等. 微生物在地下水污染修复中的应用研究进展[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2021, 43(5): 638-643.
[2] 吕鑫江, 郑文杰, 王琳, 等. 酶促碳酸盐与磷酸盐技术矿化铜(Cu)污染黄土的试验及内在影响机理研究[J/OL]. 土木工程学报. 2024, 1-12.
https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.15951/j.tmgcxb.23100848, 2024-12-22.
[3] 王萌, 李杉杉, 李晓越, 等. 我国土壤中铜的污染现状与修复研究进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2018, 25(5): 305-313.
[4] Yuan, X., Xue, N. and Han, Z. (2021) A Meta-Analysis of Heavy Metals Pollution in Farmland and Urban Soils in China over the Past 20 Years. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 101, 217-226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 何斌, 温旺, 贾立军, 等. 重金属污染土修复技术研究综述[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(6): 2260-2267.
[6] 边汉亮, 吉培瑞, 王俊岭, 等. EICP修复重金属污染土的环境耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2779-278.
[7] 邱鈺峰, 陈萍, 郑康琪, 等. 利用土著微生物处理焚烧飞灰及资源化初探[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(5): 2220-2228.
[8] 郑俊杰, 宋杨, 赖汉江, 等. 微生物固化纤维加筋砂土抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2019, 41(1): 15-21.
[9] 岳建伟, 张宝玺, 赵丽敏, 等. 改良微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀技术加固粉性土力学性能[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(18): 7702-7710.
[10] Roksana, K., Hewage, S.A., Lomboy, M.M., Tang, C., Xue, W. and Zhu, C. (2023) Desiccation Cracking Remediation through Enzyme Induced Calcite Precipitation in Fine-Grained Soils under Wetting Drying Cycles. Biogeotechnics, 1, Article 100049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Hamdan, N. and Kavazanjian, E. (2016) Enzyme-Induced Carbonate Mineral Precipitation for Fugitive Dust Control. Géotechnique, 66, 546-555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 王茂林, 吴世军, 杨永强, 等. 微生物诱导碳酸盐沉淀及其在固定重金属领域的应用进展[J]. 环境科学研究, 2018, 31(2): 206-214.
[13] Achal, V. (2012) Bioremediation of Pb-Contaminated Soil Based on Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 22, 244-247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 许耀东, 章荣军, 黄小松, 等. MICP修复重金属污染溶液及矿化垃圾土试验研究[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2024, 46(5): 117-126.
[15] 王新花, 赵晨曦, 潘响亮. 基于微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀(MICP)的铅污染生物修复[J]. 地球与环境, 2015, 43(1): 80-85.
[16] 黄小松, 章荣军, 崔明娟, 等. 巴氏芽孢杆菌生物修复重金属污染溶液试验研究[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2022, 44(3): 160-167.
[17] Duarte-Nass, C., Rebolledo, K., Valenzuela, T., Kopp, M., Jeison, D., Rivas, M., et al. (2020) Application of Microbe-Induced Carbonate Precipitation for Copper Removal from Copper-Enriched Waters: Challenges to Future Industrial Application. Journal of Environmental Management, 256, Article 109938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Wang, L., Cheng, W., Xue, Z. and Hu, W. (2022) Effects of the Urease Concentration and Calcium Source on Enzyme-Induced Carbonate Precipitation for Lead Remediation. Frontiers in Chemistry, 10, Article 892090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 边汉亮, 张旭钢, 韩一, 等. 大豆脲酶对Zn2+污染土的修复试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2022, 52(11): 67-70.
[20] 陆爱灵, 朱东云, 张宏, 等. EICP联合生物炭固化修复重金属污染土试验[J]. 环境工程, 2023, 41(8): 176-180.
[21] Cui, M., Lai, H., Wu, S. and Chu, J. (2024) Comparison of Soil Improvement Methods Using Crude Soybean Enzyme, Bacterial Enzyme or Bacteria-Induced Carbonate Precipitation. Géotechnique, 74, 18-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. CJ/T340-2016 绿化种植土壤[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
[23] 王娟, 和文祥, 孙铁珩. 铜对土壤脲酶活性特征的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 35(11): 135-140.
[24] 沈禄, 吴蓉蓉, 徐汝悦, 等. 基于MICP的水体重金属微生物修复技术研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2023, 46(3): 9-22.