选择子网络的飞机恢复问题模型改进研究
Research on Model Improvement for Aircraft Recovery Based on Sub-Network Selection
摘要: 本文分析选择子网络的飞机恢复方法的缺陷,即非目标不正常航班可能导致额外的航班取消。针对该缺陷,本文对经典飞机恢复模型进行改进,增加虚拟航班的概念以减小非目标不正常航班的影响。最后,本文使用机器学习选择子网络并滚动求解,对改进模型的效果进行测试。实验结果对经典模型和改进模型的结果进行对比,显示出改进模型在减少航班取消数量上的显著优势。
Abstract: This paper analyzes the deficiency of aircraft recovery methods that employ sub-network selection, namely, the potential for non-target irregular flights to result in additional flight cancellations. To address this deficiency, this paper proposes an improvement to the classic aircraft recovery model by introducing the concept of virtual flights to mitigate the impact of non-target irregular flights. Finally, this paper utilizes machine learning to select sub-networks and employs a rolling approach to recover the whole network, thereby testing the effectiveness of the improved model. Experimental results comparing the outcomes of the classic model and the improved model demonstrate the significant advantage of the latter in reducing the number of flight cancellations.
文章引用:陈斌斌. 选择子网络的飞机恢复问题模型改进研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2024, 14(6): 982-989. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2024.146595

参考文献

[1] 朱金福, 等. 航空运输规划[M]. 西安: 西北工业大学出版社, 2009.
[2] Su, Y., Xie, K., Wang, H., Liang, Z., Art Chaovalitwongse, W. and Pardalos, P.M. (2021) Airline Disruption Management: A Review of Models and Solution Methods. Engineering, 7, 435-447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Haghani, A. and Oh, S. (1996) Formulation and Solution of a Multi-Commodity, Multi-Modal Network Flow Model for Disaster Relief Operations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 30, 231-250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Rosenberger, J.M., Johnson, E.L. and Nemhauser, G.L. (2003) Rerouting Aircraft for Airline Recovery. Transportation Science, 37, 408-421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Eggenberg, N., Salani, M. and Bierlaire, M. (2010) Constraint-Specific Recovery Network for Solving Airline Recovery Problems. Computers & Operations Research, 37, 1014-1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Liang, Z., Xiao, F., Qian, X., Zhou, L., Jin, X., Lu, X., et al. (2018) A Column Generation-Based Heuristic for Aircraft Recovery Problem with Airport Capacity Constraints and Maintenance Flexibility. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 113, 70-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Vos, H.M., Santos, B.F. and Omondi, T. (2015) Aircraft Schedule Recovery Problem – A Dynamic Modeling Framework for Daily Operations. Transportation Research Procedia, 10, 931-940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Vink, J., Santos, B.F., Verhagen, W.J.C., Medeiros, I. and Filho, R. (2020) Dynamic Aircraft Recovery Problem—An Operational Decision Support Framework. Computers & Operations Research, 117, Article ID: 104892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Eikelenboom, B. and Santos, B.F. (2023) A Decision-Support Tool for the Integrated Airline Recovery Using a Machine Learning Resources Selection Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Haider, I., Sen, G., Arsalan, M. and Das, A.K. (2024) Subnetwork Prediction Approach for Aircraft Schedule Recovery. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 133, Article ID: 108472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Zhang, D., Henry Lau, H.Y.K. and Yu, C. (2015) A Two Stage Heuristic Algorithm for the Integrated Aircraft and Crew Schedule Recovery Problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87, 436-453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Wei, K. and Vaze, V. (2024) Efficient Construction of Arc-Based Transportation Network Models Using Graph Attention Networks. SSRN Electronic Journal. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Friedman, J.H. (2001) Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29, 1189-1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Chen, T. and Guestrin, C. (2016) XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, 13-17 August 2016, 785-794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef