基于植物群落抗旱演替模型的生态与环境影响因素作用机理量化分析
Quantitative Analysis of the Mechanism of Ecological and Environmental Factors Based on the Drought Resistance Succession Model of Plant Communities
摘要: 本文基于抗旱演替模型,以蕨类植物为例,量化分析了武陵山区植物群落的生态与环境驱动因素。在生态因素分析中,首先验证了植物群落在生态系统中的重要性,表明群落相较于单一物种更能适应环境变化并长期生存。其次,通过隶属函数法,将植物划分为强、中、弱抗旱性三类,并仿真模拟各类群落在干旱条件下的演替动态,结果显示中抗旱性植物群落具有更高的稳定性。在环境驱动因素分析中,构建了随机降雨模型以模拟不同干旱频率下的降雨情况,并探讨干旱频率对植物群落生态位宽度的影响。研究发现,干旱频率的增加导致物种生态位宽度缩小和群落演替的稳定性降低。本研究为干旱条件下植物群落的保护与生态管理提供了科学依据。
Abstract: Based on the drought resistance succession model, this paper quantitatively analyzed the ecological and environmental driving factors of plant communities in Wuling Mountain Area, taking ferns as an example. In the ecological factor analysis, the importance of plant communities in ecosystems was first verified, indicating that communities are more adaptable to environmental changes and survive for a long time than single species. Secondly, plants were divided into three categories of strong, medium and weak drought resistance through the membership function method, and the succession dynamics of various communities under drought conditions were simulated. The results showed that medium drought resistance plant communities have higher stability. In the environmental driving factor analysis, a random rainfall model was constructed to simulate rainfall under different drought frequencies, and the effect of drought frequency on the niche width of plant communities was explored. The study found that the increase in drought frequency led to a reduction in the niche width of species and a decrease in the stability of community succession. This study provides a scientific basis for the protection and ecological management of plant communities under drought conditions.
文章引用:朱文艳, 雷思玲, 庹清, 陈茜. 基于植物群落抗旱演替模型的生态与环境影响因素作用机理量化分析[J]. 理论数学, 2024, 14(12): 211-219. https://doi.org/10.12677/pm.2024.1412422

参考文献

[1] 朱文艳, 庹清, 陈茜. 全球变暖情景下武陵山喀斯特地区植物群落干旱性特征分析[J]. 可持续发展, 2024, 14(4): 992-1003.
[2] 龙姿羽, 王志成, 赵蕊, 等. 德夯地质公园林溪交错带草本群落优势种生态位及种间联结[J]. 西北植物学报, 2024, 44(12): 1954-1964.
[3] 胡宁宁, 崔雨昕, 孙萌, 等. 秦岭西段典型森林群落灌木层优势种群生态位与种间联结[J/OL]. 生态学杂志: 1-13.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/21.1148.q.20240611.1658.006.html, 2024-11-22.
[4] 刘冰娴. 全球气候变化对中国近海熊本牡蛎潜在分布和生态位的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院海洋研究所), 2024.
[5] 董妍妍. 武陵山石漠化地区人工混交林土壤性质空间异质性[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2021.
[6] 陈功锡, 敖成奇, 廖文波, 等. 武陵山地区蕨类植物区系与邻近区系关系的比较研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23(1): 120-126.
[7] 孙丽, 陈曦炜, 宋振华, 等. 武陵山地区干旱时空特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(S1): 118-125.
[8] 郎南军. 云南干热河谷退化生态系统植被恢复影响因子研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2005.
[9] 陈雷, 张枫叶, 贺群岭, 等. 基于隶属函数法和主成分分析评价花生品种花针期抗旱性[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(14): 87-94.
[10] 张俊, 汤丰收, 刘娟, 等. 利用隶属函数法对不同花生品种的抗旱性评价[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2014(23): 42-45.
[11] 孙雪婷, 曹妍, 李国树. 五种蕨类植物抗旱生理指标研究[J]. 楚雄师范学院学报, 2012, 27(6): 45-52.
[12] 黄超群. 南京市几种蕨类植物孢子繁殖及抗旱性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2006.
[13] 沈彦会, 蔡静如, 许建新, 等. 华南地区六种蕨类植物耐旱性研究[J]. 广西植物, 2018, 38(8): 1032-1040.
[14] 梁晓华, 施娅云, 张燕. 干旱胁迫对三种蕨类植物生理生化的影响[J]. 楚雄师范学院学报, 2020, 35(6): 55-61.
[15] 沈积怀, 刘学珍. 降雨空间概率模型及产流计算[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2009, 55(5): 72-73, 199.
[16] 江聪, 熊立华, 黄俊哲, 等. 融合降雨随机变量的洪水频率分布估计方法研究[J]. 水利学报, 2023, 54(1): 45-53.
[17] Shibabaw, N., Berhane, T., Kebede, T. and Walelign, A. (2022) Spatio-Temporal Rainfall Distribution and Markov Chain Analogue Year Stochastic Daily Rainfall Model in Ethiopia. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 13, 210-219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 高超. 气候变化下基于事件特性的日随机降雨模型研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2020.
[19] Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S. and Balakrishnan, N. (1995) Continuous Univariate Distributions, Vol 2. 2nd Edition, Wiley.
[20] 郭京衡, 曾凡江, 李尝君, 张波. 塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘三种防护林植物根系构型及其生态适应策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(1): 36-44.
[21] 单立山, 李毅, 任伟, 苏世平, 董秋莲, 耿东梅. 河西走廊中部两种荒漠植物根系构型特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(1): 25-31.
[22] 佟大千. 基于改进标准化降水指数的北方少雨区干旱频率分析[J]. 水利技术监督, 2022(7): 189-192.