酒店服务机器人拟人化对顾客服务满意度的影响分析
Impact of Anthropomorphism of Hotel Service Robots on Customer Service Satisfaction
摘要: 在AI技术的驱动下,人形服务机器人越来越多地被使用,也有越来越多的学者研究人形机器人的应用。目前大部分的研究主要集中在技术层面与服务机器人采纳研究。从顾客角度探讨服务机器人的不同拟人化维度及其对顾客服务质量和满意度的研究较少看到。为弥补这个不足,本文研究问题是服务机器人拟人化的不同维度与顾客服务满意度的关系分析。为此,本文拟基于期望确认模型等,从机器人拟人化的物理维度与心理维度构建研究模型,通过数据收集,在借助于偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)方法进行实证研究。研究结果表明:机器人的语言拟人化和个性化可通过温暖和期望确认度,对服务满意度产生显著积极影响。然而,外观拟人化与自主性的影响暂未得到确认。这一研究为酒店的智能化服务发展提供了重要参考,有助于酒店优化服务模式,提高服务效率与服务体验,推动酒店行业在智能化时代不断创新发展。未来可进一步探索如何更好地发挥服务机器人的优势,以满足客户日益增长的需求。
Abstract: Driven by AI technology, humanoid service robots are increasingly used, and increasing scholars are studying the application of humanoid robots. Most of the current research focuses on the technical aspects with service robot adoption research. Fewer studies have been seen exploring the different anthropomorphic dimensions of service robots and their impact on customer service quality and satisfaction from a customer perspective. To fill this gap, the research question of this paper is to analyze the relationship between different dimensions of service robot anthropomorphism and customer service satisfaction. To this end, this paper proposes to construct a research model from the physical and psychological dimensions of robot anthropomorphism based on the Expectation Confirmation Model, etc., through data collection, and conduct an empirical study with the help of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) method. The results of the study show that verbal anthropomorphism and personalization of robots can have a significant positive impact on service satisfaction through warmth and expectation confirmation. However, the impact of appearance anthropomorphisation and autonomy is not confirmed yet. This study provides an important reference for the development of intelligent services in hotels, which can help hotels optimize their service mode, improve service efficiency and service experience, and promote the hotel industry’s continuous innovation and development in the intelligent era. In the future, we can further explore how to better utilize the advantages of service robots to meet the growing needs of customers.
文章引用:吴琪. 酒店服务机器人拟人化对顾客服务满意度的影响分析[J]. 现代管理, 2024, 14(12): 3270-3284. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2024.1412392

参考文献

[1] 艾媒产业升级研究中心. 艾媒咨询|2022年度中国机器人行业发展专题研究报告[EB/OL]. 2022-12-24.
https://www.iimedia.cn/c400/90925.html
, 2023-10-28.
[2] 李泽宽. 软银谭志强: 已有超2000家企业“聘用”机器人Pepper [EB/OL]. 2018-08-17.
https://www.163.com/tech/article/DPE5QS6J00098IEO.html
, 2023-10-28.
[3] Ting, D. (2016) The Tiny Hilton Robot Concierge That Hints at IBM’s Ambitious Plans for Travel.
https://skift.com/2016/03/09/the-tiny-hilton-robot-concierge-that-hints-at-ibms-ambitious-plans-for-travel/
[4] Dang, J. and Liu, L. (2023) Social Connectedness Promotes Robot Anthropomorphism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 15, 318-328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Epley, N., Waytz, A. and Cacioppo, J.T. (2007) On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864-886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Song, X., Gu, H., Li, Y., Leung, X.Y. and Ling, X. (2023) The Influence of Robot Anthropomorphism and Perceived Intelligence on Hotel Guests’ Continuance Usage Intention. Information Technology & Tourism, 26, 89-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Patwary, A.K., Hossain, M.S., Mistry, T.G. and Parvez, M.O. (2024) Enhancing Service Adaptability: A Moderated Mediation Model of Workplace Ostracism, Robot Anthropomorphism, Employees’ Readiness to Change, and Performance Efficacy. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 15, 897-915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Klüber, K. and Onnasch, L. (2022) Appearance Is Not Everything—Preferred Feature Combinations for Care Robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Mulcahy, R.F., Riedel, A., Keating, B., Beatson, A. and Letheren, K. (2023) Avoiding Excessive AI Service Agent Anthropomorphism: Examining Its Role in Delivering Bad News. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 34, 98-126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Zhang, M., Gursoy, D., Zhu, Z. and Shi, S. (2021) Impact of Anthropomorphic Features of Artificially Intelligent Service Robots on Consumer Acceptance: Moderating Role of Sense of Humor. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33, 3883-3905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Chatzoglou, P.D., Lazaraki, V., Apostolidis, S.D. and Gasteratos, A.C. (2023) Factors Affecting Acceptance of Social Robots among Prospective Users. International Journal of Social Robotics, 16, 1361-1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Spaccatini, F., Corlito, G. and Sacchi, S. (2023) New Dyads? The Effect of Social Robots’ Anthropomorphization on Empathy towards Human Beings. Computers in Human Behavior, 146, Article ID: 107821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Cui, J. and Zhong, J. (2023) The Effect of Robot Anthropomorphism on Revisit Intentions after Service Failure: A Moderated Serial Mediation Model. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35, 2621-2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Liu, M., Yang, Y., Ren, Y., Jia, Y., Ma, H., Luo, J., et al. (2024) What Influences Consumer AI Chatbot Use Intention? an Application of the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 15, 667-689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Schreibelmayr, S. and Mara, M. (2022) Robot Voices in Daily Life: Vocal Human-Likeness and Application Context as Determinants of User Acceptance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 787499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Pizzi, G., Vannucci, V., Mazzoli, V. and Donvito, R. (2023) I, Chatbot! The Impact of Anthropomorphism and Gaze Direction on Willingness to Disclose Personal Information and Behavioral Intentions. Psychology & Marketing, 40, 1372-1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] van Pinxteren, M.M.E., Wetzels, R.W.H., Rüger, J., Pluymaekers, M. and Wetzels, M. (2019) Trust in Humanoid Robots: Implications for Services Marketing. Journal of Services Marketing, 33, 507-518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Choi, Y., Choi, M., Oh, M. and Kim, S. (2019) Service Robots in Hotels: Understanding the Service Quality Perceptions of Human-Robot Interaction. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 29, 613-635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] So, K.K.F., Kim, H., Liu, S.Q., Fang, X. and Wirtz, J. (2023) Service Robots: The Dynamic Effects of Anthropomorphism and Functional Perceptions on Consumers’ Responses. European Journal of Marketing, 58, 1-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Salem, M., Eyssel, F., Rohlfing, K., Kopp, S. and Joublin, F. (2013) To Err Is Human(-Like): Effects of Robot Gesture on Perceived Anthropomorphism and Likability. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5, 313-323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Chung, H., Kang, H. and Jun, S. (2023) Verbal Anthropomorphism Design of Social Robots: Investigating Users’ Privacy Perception. Computers in Human Behavior, 142, Article ID: 107640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Plotkina, D., Orkut, H. and Karageyim, M.A. (2024) Give Me a Human! How Anthropomorphism and Robot Gender Affect Trust in Financial Robo-Advisory Services. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 36, 2689-2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Li, Y., Zhou, X., Jiang, X., Fan, F. and Song, B. (2024) How Service Robots’ Human-Like Appearance Impacts Consumer Trust: A Study across Diverse Cultures and Service Settings. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36, 3151-3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Christoforakos, L., Gallucci, A., Surmava-Große, T., Ullrich, D. and Diefenbach, S. (2021) Can Robots Earn Our Trust the Same Way Humans Do? A Systematic Exploration of Competence, Warmth, and Anthropomorphism as Determinants of Trust Development in Hri. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, Article 640444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Chen, J., Li, M. and Ham, J. (2024) Different Dimensions of Anthropomorphic Design Cues: How Visual Appearance and Conversational Style Influence Users’ Information Disclosure Tendency Towards Chatbots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 190, Article ID: 103320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Kim, T., Lee, O.D. and Kang, J. (2023) Is It the Best for Barista Robots to Serve Like Humans? A Multidimensional Anthropomorphism Perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 108, Article ID: 103358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Chew, S., Tay, W., Smit, D. and Bartneck, C. (2010) Do Social Robots Walk or Roll? In: Ge, S.S., Li, H., Cabibihan, J.J. and Tan, Y.K., Eds., Social Robotics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 355-361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Cao, C., Zhao, L. and Hu, Y. (2019) Anthropomorphism of Intelligent Personal Assistants (IPAs): Antecedents and Consequences. PACIS.
[29] Oliver, R.L. (1980) A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly, 25, 351-370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Heitlinger, L., Stock-Homburg, R. and Wolf, F.D. (2022) You Got the Job! Understanding Hiring Decisions for Robots as Organizational Members. 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Sapporo, 7-10 March 2022, 530-540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Kim, S., Kim, H., Jung, S. and Uysal, M. (2023) The Determinants of Continuance Intention toward Activity-Based Events Using a Virtual Experience Platform (VEP). Leisure Sciences. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Mori, M. (1970) The Uncanny Valley: The Original Essay by Masahiro Mori. IEEE Spectrum.
[34] Walters, M.L., Syrdal, D.S., Dautenhahn, K., Te Boekhorst, R. and Koay, K.L. (2007) Avoiding the Uncanny Valley: Robot Appearance, Personality and Consistency of Behavior in an Attention-Seeking Home Scenario for a Robot Companion. Autonomous Robots, 24, 159-178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Konya-Baumbach, E., Biller, M. and von Janda, S. (2023) Someone Out There? A Study on the Social Presence of Anthropomorphized Chatbots. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, Article ID: 107513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] Roy, R. and Naidoo, V. (2021) Enhancing Chatbot Effectiveness: The Role of Anthropomorphic Conversational Styles and Time Orientation. Journal of Business Research, 126, 23-34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] Beer, J.M., Fisk, A.D. and Rogers, W.A. (2012) Toward a Psychological Framework for Levels of Robot Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 3, 74-99.
[38] Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B. and Wickens, C.D. (2000) A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and CyberneticsPart A: Systems and Humans, 30, 286-297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Roesler, E., Steinhaeusser, S.C., Lugrin, B. and Onnasch, L. (2022) The Influence of Visible Cables and Story Content on Perceived Autonomy in Social Human-Robot Interaction. Robotics, 12, Article 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[40] Prentice, C. and Nguyen, M. (2021) Robotic Service Quality—Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 62, Article ID: 102661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[41] Chuah, S.H. and Yu, J. (2021) The Future of Service: The Power of Emotion in Human-Robot Interaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, Article ID: 102551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[42] Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C. and Glick, P. (2007) Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Beer, J.M., Fisk, A.D. and Rogers, W.A. (2014) Toward a Framework for Levels of Robot Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 3, 74-99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Oliveira, R., Arriaga, P., Correia, F. and Paiva, A. (2019) The Stereotype Content Model Applied to Human-Robot Interactions in Groups. 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Daegu, 11-14 March 2019, 123-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[45] Aggarwal, P. and McGill, A.L. (2007) Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 468-479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[46] Lim, X., Chang, J.Y., Cheah, J., Lim, W.M., Kraus, S. and Dabić, M. (2024) Out of the Way, Human! Understanding Post-Adoption of Last-Mile Delivery Robots. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, Article ID: 123242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[47] Shah, T.R., Kautish, P. and Mehmood, K. (2023) Influence of Robots Service Quality on Customers’ Acceptance in Restaurants. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35, 3117-3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[48] Wang, P., Kwon, S. and Zhang, W. (2022) A Study on the Effect of Anthropomorphism, Intelligence, and Autonomy of Ipas on Continuous Usage Intention: From the Perspective of Bi-Dimensional Value. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 32, 125-150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[49] Selamat, M.A. and Windasari, N.A. (2021) Chatbot for SMEs: Integrating Customer and Business Owner Perspectives. Technology in Society, 66, Article ID: 101685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[50] Li, Y., Wang, C. and Song, B. (2022) Customer Acceptance of Service Robots under Different Service Settings. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 33, 46-71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[51] Park, A. and Lee, S.B. (2023) Examining AI and Systemic Factors for Improved Chatbot Sustainability. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 64, 728-742.
[52] Song, X., Li, Y., Leung, X.Y. and Mei, D. (2023) Service Robots and Hotel Guests’ Perceptions: Anthropomorphism and Stereotypes. Tourism Review, 79, 505-522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[53] Chen, Y., Wu, X., Jia, F., Yang, J., Bai, X. and Yu, R. (2024) Exploring the Impact of Social Robot Design Characteristics on Users’ Privacy Concerns: Evidence from PLS-SEM and FsQCA. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[54] Fan, A., Lu, Z. and Mao, Z. (2022) To Talk or to Touch: Unraveling Consumer Responses to Two Types of Hotel In-Room Technology. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 101, 103112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[55] Wan, L., Xie, S. and Shu, A. (2020) Toward an Understanding of University Students’ Continued Intention to Use MOOCs: When UTAUT Model Meets TTF Model. Sage Open, 10, 1-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[56] Cohen, J. (2013) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge.
[57] Li, K. and Li, G. (2023) Study on the Impact of Service Robot Autonomy on Customer Satisfaction. In: Nah, F. and Siau, K., Eds., HCI in Business, Government and Organizations, Springer Nature Switzerland, 30-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[58] Pande, S. and Gupta, K.P. (2022) Indian Customers’ Acceptance of Service Robots in Restaurant Services. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42, 1946-1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[59] Zhu, T., Lin, Z. and Liu, X. (2023) The Future Is Now? Consumers’ Paradoxical Expectations of Human-Like Service Robots. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, Article ID: 122830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef