长江下游九江–大通河段水面比降变化特征分析
Analysis of Surface Slope in Jiujiang-Datong Reach of the Lower Yangtze River
DOI: 10.12677/jwrr.2024.136066, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 卞佳琪, 史常乐, 龚朝海, 柯 达, 何 琦:长江水利委员会水文局长江下游水文水资源勘测局,江苏 南京
关键词: 长江下游水面比降趋势检验突变点The Lower Yangtze River Surface Slope Trend Analysis Change-Point
摘要: 基于长江下游干流九江–大通河段历史日均水面比降,辨识该河段水面比降的变化趋势和突变点,分析突变前后水面比降的变化特征及影响因子。结果表明:1) 1957~2023年,九江–大通河段全年、汛期、非汛期平均水面比降下降趋势显著。水面比降近似呈现单峰特征,汛期较大,非汛期较小,7月左右达到峰值;2) 全年、汛期、非汛期平均水面比降均于2003~2005年间发生了突变。三峡蓄水后水面比降较蓄水前整体有所下降,其中:月最大除6月份微增2.0%外,其余月份降低0.2%~12.9%;月最小除1月~4月微增1.9%~5.2%外,其余月份降低0.2%~20.8%,月平均较蓄水前降低0.1%~12.4%;3) 蓄水前后,水面比降与上下游流量关系有所改变,蓄水后高水与低水的水面比降差异明显高于蓄水前,可认为水库调度对下游水文、河道产生了一定影响。
Abstract: Based on the surface slope data of Jiujiang-Datong reach of the lower Yangtze River, the trend and change point of surface slope were extracted, and the change characteristics and influence factors before and after the change point were analysed. The results indicate that: 1) From 1957 to 2023, the average slope data of Jiujiang-Datong reach showed a significant downward trend throughout the year, flood season, and non flood season. The surface slope is relatively larger during the flood season and smaller during the non flood season, reaching its peak around July; 2) The surface slope experienced a sudden change throughout the year, flood season, and non flood season in 2003 to 2005. Since the operation of the TGD, the surface slope has decreased, with the maximum monthly surface slope decreased by 0.2%~12.9% except for a slight increase of 2.0% in June; except for a slight increase of 1.9%~5.2% from January to April, the monthly minimum surface slope decreased by 0.2%~20.8% in other months, and the monthly average surface slope decreased by 0.1%~12.4%; 3) The relationship between surface slope and flow has changed before and after the operation of the TGD. The difference in surface slope between high and low water levels has significantly increased after the operation of the TGD. It can be considered that the reservoirs scheduling has a certain impact on the downstream hydrology and waterway.
文章引用:卞佳琪, 史常乐, 龚朝海, 柯达, 何琦. 长江下游九江–大通河段水面比降变化特征分析[J]. 水资源研究, 2024, 13(6): 584-595. https://doi.org/10.12677/jwrr.2024.136066

参考文献

[1] 姚允龙. 长江下游干流南京至镇江河段水面比降分析[J]. 水文, 2008, 28(2): 78-79, 29.
[2] 陈吉琴, 张莉, 王艳. 长江与洞庭湖汇流段水面比降的特征变化分析[J]. 广东水利水电, 2024(4): 36-42.
[3] 田雨欣, 陈界仁. 采砂活动影响下的河道水面比降变化[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2015, 13(4): 704-707.
[4] 黄玥, 黄志霖, 肖文发, 等. 基于Mann-kendall法的三峡库区长江干流入出库断面水质变化趋势分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(4): 950-961.
[5] 郑芳芳. 金沙江流域径流变化特性分析及年径流预测[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 深圳: 四川大学, 2021.
[6] 孙永寿, 刘弢, 李燕. 黄河源区降水径流一致性及影响因素分析[J]. 人民黄河, 2021, 43(10): 51-55, 101.
[7] 倪韬. 沂沐河流域极端水文序列非一致性及频率分析研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2024.
[8] 丁晶. 洪水时间序列干扰点的统计推估[J]. 武汉水利电力学院学报, 1986(5): 36-41.
[9] 张献志, 杨明晖, 刘吉峰. 黄河内蒙古河段凌情要素序列突变点诊断[J]. 人民黄河, 2020, 42(2): 21-22, 33.
[10] 陈梅, 陈斯达, 刘曾美, 等. 广州市中心城区短历时暴雨变异特性研究[J]. 人民长江, 2016, 47(12): 1-5, 22.
[11] 时瑶, 赵艳民, 秦延文, 等. 三峡水库不同调度期水体氮形态时空分布特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(6): 9-16, 24.