青莲河流域地下水径流速度分析及资源量评价
Groundwater Flow Velocity Analysis and Resource Evaluation in the Qinglian River Basin
摘要: 本文通过分析地下水和地表水的δD和δ18O值以及3H浓度，探讨了不同地貌，特别是岩溶交互带的地下水的径流速度，并采用降雨入渗法和枯季径流模数法对各个分区的地下水资源量进行了评价。结果显示，部分岩溶交互带泉水δ18O值在雨后变得偏正，3H浓度在雨前和雨后分别为2.01 TU和1.33 TU，表明岩溶交互带泉水可能受到浅、深层火成岩裂隙水混合的影响。而该区地下暗河的3H浓度在雨前和雨后皆为1.35 TU，表明泉水对降雨的响应速度是大于地下暗河的。青莲河流域地下水排泄口的枯水期平均3H浓度揭露的地下水径流速度大小顺序为：岩溶交互带(1.60 TU) > 构造侵蚀中山(1.24 TU) > 峰丛谷地(1.17 TU) > 峰丛洼地(1.00 TU) >岩溶盆地(0.60 TU)。据计算，青莲河流域的地下水资源量为15681.05万m3/a，可采资源量为2496.03万m3/a，可开采量仅占补给量的15.91%，说明地下水可开采量是有补给保证的。研究有助于加深青莲河流域地下水循环的理解，为地下水污染防治和分区管理提供依据。
Abstract: The δD and δ18O values, as well as the concentration of 3H, of groundwater and surface water were analyzed to explore the flow velocity of groundwater in different landforms, especially in the karst hyporheic zone. Furthermore, the precipitation infiltration and dry-season runoff modulus method were used to evaluate the groundwater resources in various areas. The results showed that the δ18O value of the spring in karst hyporheic zone became positive after the rain, and the 3H concentration before and after the rain were 2.01 TU and 1.33 TU, indicating that the spring in karst hyporheic zone was affected by the mixing of shallow and deep igneous-fissure water possibly. The 3H concentration of the underground river in this area was 1.35 TU before and after rain, indicating that the response speed of spring water to rainfall is greater than that of the underground river. The order of groundwater flow velocity in dry-season revealed by the average 3H concentration of groundwater in discharge outlet was as follows: karst hyporheic zone (1.60 TU) > tectonic eroded middle mountain (1.24 TU) > peak cluster valley (1.17 TU) > peak cluster depression (1.00 TU) > karst basin (0.60 TU). In addition, the groundwater resources in Qinglian River Basin were 156,810,500 m3/a, and the recoverable resources were 24,960,300 m3/a. The recoverable amount only accounts for 15.91% of the replenished amount, indicating that the recoverable amount of groundwater was guaranteed by replenishment. This study deepens the understanding of the groundwater circulation in the Qinglian River Basin, and provides a basis for the prevention and control of groundwater pollution and scientific zoning management.
文章引用：许兰芳, 杨宏宇. 青莲河流域地下水径流速度分析及资源量评价[J]. 水资源研究, 2024, 13(6): 622-632. https://doi.org/10.12677/jwrr.2024.136070

参考文献

[1] 吕玉香, 胡伟, 杨琰. 岩溶关键带水循环过程研究进展[J]. 水科学进展, 2019, 30(1): 123-138.
[2] KONG, Y., PANG, Z. A positive altitude gradient of isotopes in the precipitation over the Tianshan Mountains: Effects of moisture recycling and sub-cloud evaporation. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 542: 222-230.[CrossRef] 
[3] UHLENBROOK, S., FREY, M., LEIBUNDGUT, C. and MALOSZEWSKI, P. Hydrograph separations in a mesoscale mountainous basin at event and seasonal timescales. Water Resources Research, 2002, 38: 311-3114.[CrossRef] 
[4] BONELL, M. Selected challenges in run off generation research in forests from the hillslope to headwater drainage basin scale. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1998, 34(4): 765-785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] BLATTNER, P., ABART, R., ADAMS, C. J., FAURE, K. and HUI, L. Oxygen isotope trends and anomalies in granitoids of the Tibetan plateau. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2002, 21(3): 241-250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] CARTWRIGHT, I., WEAVER, T. R. and FIFIELD, L. K. Cl/Br ratios and environmental isotopes as indicators of recharge variability and groundwater flow: An example from the southeast Murray Basin, Australia. Chemical Geology, 2006, 231(1): 38-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] SCHLOSSER, P., STUTE, M., DÖRR, H., SONNTAG, C. and MÜNNICH, K. O. Tritium/3He dating of shallow groundwater. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1988, 89(3): 353-362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] HOLT, T., GRESKOWIAK, J., SÜLTENFUß, J. and MASSMANN, G. Groundwater age distribution in a highly dynamic coastal aquifer. Advances in Water Resources, 2021, 149: 103850.[CrossRef] 
[9] 叶晓华, 白平. 川北地区岩溶发育特征及水资源利用前景浅析——以曾家山地区为例[J]. 四川地质学报, 2019, 39(4): 642-647.
[10] 孙百茹. 辽宁山区地下水径流模数的分布规律[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 1982(1): 26-29.
[11] 郑悦华, 张晓远, 刘协亭. 基于GIS的粤北青莲水流域水土流失成因分析[J]. 广东水利水电, 2016(5): 24-28.
[12] XU, L., NI, Z., HUANG, W., TU, S., JIANG, S., ZHUANG, Z., ZHAO, L. and YANG, H. Groundwater geochemistry in the karst-fissure aquifer system of the Qinglian River Basin, China. Hydrology, 2024, 11(11): 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] COOK, G. T., PASSO, C. J. and CARTER, B. 6. Environmental liquid scintillation analysis. In L’ANNUNZIATA, M. F. Handbook of radioactivity analysis (2nd Edition). Academic Press: San Diego. 2003: 537-607.[CrossRef] 
[14] O’NEIL, J. R., SHAW, S. E. and FLOOD, R. H. Oxygen and hydrogen isotope compositions as indicators of granite genesis in the New England Batholith, Australia. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1977, 62(3): 313-328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] HARRIS, C., FAURE, K., DIAMOND, R. E. and SCHEEPERS, R. Oxygen and hydrogen isotope geochemistry of S-and I-type granitoids: The Cape Granite suite, South Africa. Chemical Geology, 1997, 143(1): 95-114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] DUAN, W., RUAN, J., LUO, W., LI, T., TIAN, L., ZENG, G., ZHANG, D., BAI, Y., LI, J., TAO, T., ZHANG, P., BAKER, A. and TAN, M. The transfer of seasonal isotopic variability between precipitation and drip water at eight caves in the monsoon regions of China. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2016, 183: 250-266.[CrossRef] 
[17] 姜守俊, 许兰芳, 倪泽华, 杨宏宇, 涂世亮. 广东清远盆地地下水水文地球化学及流场特征[J]. 华南地质, 2023, 39(4): 672-685.
[18] 顾慰祖, 庞忠和, 王全九, 宋献方. 同位素水文学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 1-1113.
[19] BETHKE, C. M., JOHNSON, T. M. Groundwater age and groundwater age dating. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2008, 36: 121-152.[CrossRef] 
[20] 广东省地质局水文工程地质一大队. 粤北岩溶石山地区和雷州半岛地区地下水资源勘查监测报告(粤北岩溶石山地区) [R]. 2011.