基于建构主义的混合式教学评价指标体系研究
Research on the Evaluation System of Blended Teaching Based on Constructivism
DOI: 10.12677/ve.2025.141036, PDF,   
作者: 杜 青：上海工程技术大学航空运输学院，上海
关键词: 建构主义；混合式教学；评价体系；Constructivism； Blended Teaching； Evaluation System
摘要: 近年来，混合式教学模式因其融合传统课堂与在线学习的优势已成为高等教育的“新常态”。然而，如何有效利用教学评价来确保该模式下的教学质量，成为了教育领域亟待解决的问题。本文立足于建构主义理论，深入剖析了混合式教学评价的核心原则，并以“航空学术英语”课程为实证案例，详细阐述了教学评价的具体流程及其在实际教学中的有效应用，以期为高校一线教师开展混合式教学质量评价和研究提供参考。
Abstract: In recent years, the blended teaching model has become the “new normal” in higher education due to its integration of traditional classroom and online learning advantages. However, how to effectively use evaluation system to ensure the quality of teaching in this model has become an urgent issue to be resolved in the field of education. This paper, based on constructivist theory, deeply analyzes the core principles of blended teaching evaluation, and takes the “Aviation English” course as a practical case study. It elaborates on the specific process of teaching evaluation and its effective application in actual teaching, with the aim of providing a reference for frontline teachers in colleges and universities to carry out blended teaching quality evaluation and research.
文章引用：杜青. 基于建构主义的混合式教学评价指标体系研究[J]. 职业教育发展, 2025, 14(1): 234-242. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2025.141036

参考文献

[1] Schwartz, D.L., Lindgren, R. and Lewis, S. (2009) Constructivism in an Age of Non-Constructivist Assessments. In: Tobias, S. and Duffy, T.M., Eds., Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure? Routledge, 24-61.
[2] Tyler, R. (1949) Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. University of Chicago Press.
[3] Scriven, M. (1967) The Methodology of Evaluation. In: Tyler, R.W., Gagné, R.M. and Scriven, M., Eds., Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, Rand McNally, 39-83.
[4] Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] 许华琼, 胡中锋. 形成性评价及其反馈策略[J]. 教育测量与评价: 理论版, 2010(1): 23-26.
[6] Piaget, J. (1970) Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Orion Press.
[7] Mintzes, J.J., Wandersee, J.H. and Novak, J.D. (2005) Assessing Science Understanding: A Human Constructivist View. Elsevier Academic Press.
[8] 杨浩. 高职院校混合式教学质量评价指标体系构建与应用实践[J]. 中国职业技术教育, 2019, 35(11): 69-75.
[9] 郭建东. 混合式教学评价指标体系的构建与应用研究[J]. 成人教育, 2020, 40(12): 20-25.
[10] 李逢庆, 韩晓玲. 混合式教学质量评价体系的构建与实践[J]. 中国电化教育, 2017(11): 108-113.
[11] 高慧敏. 继续教育混合式学习评价体系的建构——以云南某高校继续教育为例[J]. 继续教育, 2017(11): 14-16.
[12] 孙翔, 冯庆革, 黄华存, 唐艳葵, 梁艳. 慕课与翻转课堂混合式立体化教学评价体系的构建及应用效果分析[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2018, 24(24): 69-71, 76.
[13] 李华, 魏一通. 混合式教学中学生学习行为评估体系构建与应用研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2020(10): 58-66.
[14] Mahony, T.O. (2017) The Impact of a Constructivist Approach to Assessment and Feedback on Student Satisfaction and Learning: A Case-Study. Practitioner Research in Higher Education Journal, 13, 16-27.
[15] Shute, V.J. (2008) Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Nicol, D. (2010) From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 35, 501-517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] O’Donovan, B., Rust, C. and Price, M. (2015) A Scholarly Approach to Solving the Feedback Dilemma in Practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 938-949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] 威金斯∙迈克泰. 理解力培养与课程设计——一种教学和评价的新实践[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2001.

为你推荐