电商平台“二选一”行为的反垄断法规制研究
Study on Antimonopoly Law Regulation of E-Commerce Platform’s “Either-Or Choice” Behaviour
摘要: “二选一”是指电商平台利用其优势地位,要求平台上的经营者不得在其他平台上经营的行为。“二选一”一定程度上侵害了其他电商平台和平台上经营者的合法权益,也损害了广大消费者的公平选择权和自主交易权,有必要予以规制。当前,我国法律在规制“二选一”行为时均展现出一定的局限性,导致不能有效规制“二选一”行为。因此,应采取有效措施解决这一问题,具体而言,应将《反垄断法》作为规制“二选一”行为的核心规范,并对其进行完善,如明确正当理由的认定标准,引入滥用相对优势地位条款,完善平台监管体系。
Abstract: “Either-Or Choice” refers to the behaviour of an e-commerce platform that takes advantage of its dominant position to require operators on the platform not to operate on other platforms. To a certain extent, “Either-Or Choice” infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of other e-commerce platforms and operators on the platform, and also damages the consumers’ right to fair choice and right to independent transactions, and it is necessary to regulate it. At present, China’s laws show certain limitations in regulating the “Either-Or Choice” behaviour, resulting in the failure to effectively regulate the “Either-Or Choice” behaviour. Therefore, effective measures should be taken to solve this problem. Specifically, the Anti-Monopoly Law should be taken as the core norms to regulate the “Either-Or Choice” behaviour and be improved, such as clarifying the criteria for the determination of justifiable reasons, introducing the clause of abuse of comparative advantage, and perfecting the platform supervision system.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王健, 季豪峥. 电子商务平台限定交易行为的竞争法分析[J]. 中国应用法学, 2020(1): 63-83.
|
|
[2]
|
曾晶. 论我国互联网平台“二选一”行为法律属性的再厘定[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2022(1): 122-136.
|
|
[3]
|
卢均晓. 关于禁止滥用优势地位的理论辨析——《电子商务法》第35条的竞争法属性: 检视与改造[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2021(10): 26-32+97.
|
|
[4]
|
焦海涛. “二选一”行为的反垄断法分析[J]. 财经法学, 2018(5): 78-92+117.
|
|
[5]
|
许光耀. 互联网产业中排他性交易行为的反垄断法分析方法[J]. 中国应用法学, 2020(1): 37-48.
|
|
[6]
|
许光耀. “相对优势地位”与“市场支配地位”的法理辨析——对《反不正当竞争法(征求意见稿)》第6条的不同阐释[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2016(5): 43-45.
|
|
[7]
|
陈兵, 云薇笑. 平台“二选一”行为的竞争法规制再探[J]. 学习与实践, 2022(4): 64-73+2.
|
|
[8]
|
兰燕卓. 电商平台“二选一”行为的规制路径探索[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2021(6): 129-137.
|