认知失调与道德消费主义：电商平台如何促进消费者选择购买
Cognitive Dissonance and Ethical Consumerism: How E-Commerce Platforms Encourage Consumers’ Choice to Purchase
摘要: 在当代电商环境中，道德消费主义逐渐受到关注，消费者越来越关心产品的环保性、社会责任及生产条件。然而，消费者的道德信念与实际购买行为之间常常存在不一致，这会引发认知失调，即当行为与信念不符时产生的心理不适感。已有研究表明，电商平台可以通过信息透明度、设计引导、价格激励等方式减少消费者的认知失调，进而促进道德消费选择。本文回顾了认知失调理论在道德消费领域的应用，分析了电商平台如何通过技术手段帮助消费者做出符合其道德信念的购买决策。最终，研究表明，电商平台在提高信息透明度、降低道德产品价格壁垒以及设计对用户友好的界面方面可以促进可持续的消费行为。
Abstract: In the contemporary e-commerce environment, ethical consumerism is gaining increasing attention, with consumers becoming more concerned about the environmental impact, social responsibility, and production conditions of products. However, there is often a discrepancy between consumers’ ethical beliefs and their actual purchasing behavior, which leads to cognitive dissonance—a psychological discomfort that arises when behavior conflicts with beliefs. Previous studies have shown that e-commerce platforms can help reduce cognitive dissonance by enhancing information transparency, providing user-friendly design, and offering price incentives, ultimately promoting ethical consumer choices. This review explores how cognitive dissonance theory applies to ethical consumerism and analyzes how e-commerce platforms can leverage technological tools to guide consumers towards decisions that align with their moral values. The findings suggest that e-commerce platforms have great potential in improving transparency, reducing price barriers for ethical products, and designing interfaces that foster sustainable purchasing behaviors.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Festinger, L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
|
|
[2]
|
Schwartz, S.H. (1992) Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Elsevier, 1-65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
Goldstein, N.J., Cialdini, R.B. and Griskevicius, V. (2008) A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472-482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
Carrington, M.J., Neville, B.A. and Whitwell, G.J. (2014) Lost in Translation: Exploring the Ethical Consumer Intention-Behavior Gap. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2759-2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
Delmas, M.A. and Burbano, V.C. (2011) The Drivers of Greenwashing. California Management Review, 54, 64-87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
Antonetti, P. and Maklan, S. (2014) Feelings That Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 117-134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Basha, M.B. and Lal, D. (2019) Indian Consumers’ Attitudes Towards Purchasing Organically Produced Foods: An Empirical Study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 99-111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
Pariser, E. (2011) The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin.
|
|
[9]
|
Gupta, S. and Ogden, D.T. (2009) To Buy or Not to Buy? A Social Dilemma Perspective on Green Buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26, 376-391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[10]
|
Sun, Y., Liu, Z. and Zhao, L. (2020) Factors and Mechanisms Affecting Green Consumption in China: A Multilevel Analysis. Sustainability, 12, Article 453.
|
|
[11]
|
Thøgersen, J. and Zhou, Y. (2012) Chinese Consumers’ Adoption of a ‘Green’ Innovation—The Case of Organic Food. Journal of Marketing Management, 28, 313-333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|