数字化背景下国家中心城市碳排放效率的测度及其收敛性研究——基于三阶段SBM-DEA模型的实证分析
Study on Measurement and Convergence of Carbon Emission Efficiency of National Central Cities under the Digital Background—Empirical Analysis Based on Three-Stage SBM-DEA Model
摘要: 基于二十大“积极稳妥推进双碳工作”的战略方针,我国国家中心城市作为城镇体系的顶层结构,全面提升资源利用效率,对实现区域协调绿色发展目标具有重要意义。论文以我国国家中心城市群为研究对象,并结合三阶段超效率SBM-DEA模型和Malmquist-Luenberger指数,对我国9个国家中心城市2005年到2019年碳排放效率进行测度。同时根据实证结果构建了面板数据模型,从投入要素角度出发,探究各因素对于国家中心城市碳减排绩效的影响程度。结果显示全国各国家中心城市碳排放效率整体水平偏低,老一代国家中心城市处于碳排放效率领先地位;从动态效果分析看,国家中心城市碳排放效率ML指数总体平均值大于1,说明各城市碳排放效率逐年增加。技术进步促进了碳排放效率ML指数的增长,纯技术效率的相对较低,总体上表现为“东中西”顺序递减的空间格局;各城市之间存在显著的空间收敛关系,禀赋结构对于收敛性有明显正向相关影响。鉴于此,本文以国家中心城市为研究对象,制定差异化碳减排政策,推动区域高质量发展。以国家中心城市为代表,积极参与国际气候合作,协同推进减碳、减污、扩绿与增长,优化城市布局,构建区域协调发展新格局。
Abstract: Based on the strategic guideline of “proactively and prudently advancing carbon neutrality” outlined in the 20th National Congress, China’s national central cities, as the top tier of the urban system, play a significant role in achieving coordinated and sustainable regional development by enhancing resource utilization efficiency. This study takes China’s national central cities as the research object and applies the three-stage super-efficiency SBM-DEA model and Malmquist-Luenberger index to measure the carbon emission efficiency of nine national central cities from 2005 to 2019. Based on the empirical results, a panel data model is constructed to analyze the impact of various input factors on carbon reduction performance in national central cities. The results indicate that the overall carbon emission efficiency of national central cities is relatively low, with older generations of national central cities leading in efficiency. From a dynamic perspective, the average ML index of carbon emission efficiency across the cities exceeds 1, indicating an annual improvement in efficiency. Technological progress is identified as the primary driver of the ML index growth, while pure technical efficiency remains relatively low. The spatial distribution of efficiency generally follows a decreasing trend from east to west. A significant spatial convergence relationship exists among cities, with resource endowment structure positively influencing convergence. In view of this, the study proposes differentiated carbon reduction policies for national central cities to promote high-quality regional development. Representing China, national central cities should actively participate in international climate cooperation, synergistically advance carbon reduction, pollution control, ecological restoration, and economic growth, optimize urban layouts, and foster a new pattern of coordinated regional development.
文章引用:王丽春, 任栩青. 数字化背景下国家中心城市碳排放效率的测度及其收敛性研究——基于三阶段SBM-DEA模型的实证分析[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(1): 2847-2858. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.141358

参考文献

[1] Kaya, Y. and Yokobori, K. (1997) Environment, Energy and Economy: Strategies for Sustainability. United Nations University Press.
[2] Sun, J.W. (2005) The Decrease of CO2 Emission Intensity Is Decarbonization at National and Global Levels. Energy Policy, 33, 975-978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Mielnik, O. and Goldemberg, J. (1999) Communication the Evolution of the “Carbonization Index” in Developing Countries. Energy Policy, 27, 307-308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 马大来, 陈仲常, 王玲. 中国省际碳排放效率的空间计量[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(1): 67-77.
[5] 李慧, 李玮, 姚西龙. 中国省域全要素碳排放效率空间特征与动态收敛性研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(19): 98-103.
[6] Tone, K. (2001) A Slacks-Based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 498-509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K., Schmidt, S.S. and Yaisawarng, S. (2002) Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, 157-174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M. and Zhang, Z.Y. (1994) Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries. American Economic Association, 84, 66-83.
[9] 张雪花, 刘文莹. 基于DEA模型的中国四个直辖市碳效率评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2015(2): 71-74.
[10] 王兆峰, 杜瑶瑶. 基于SBM-DEA模型湖南省碳排放效率时空差异及影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(5): 797-806.
[11] 成远, 乔观民, 等. 基于SBM-DEA浙江省碳排放效率时空演变研究[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2022, 38(3): 272-279.
[12] 相天东. 我国区域碳排放效率与全要素生产率研究——基于三阶段DEA模型[J]. 经济经纬, 2017, 34(1): 20-25.
[13] 袁长伟, 赵潇, 孙璐. 中国交通运输碳排放效率测度及收敛性研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2019, 42(12): 222-229.
[14] 李根忠, 朱洪亮. 基于三阶段SM-DEA-Malmquist指数的长江经济带碳排放效率研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 161-167.
[15] 黄羿, 常向阳. 低碳经济与交通运输业发展——基于国家中心城市数据的实证研究[J]. 社会科学家, 2019(11): 67-73.