大学生未来时间观与购物导向的关系：性别的调节作用
The Relationship between College Students’ Future Time Concept and Shopping Orientation: The Moderating Role of Gender
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.151019, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 董 茜：华北理工大学心理与精神卫生学院，河北 唐山；吕少博*：唐山市心理健康与认知神经科学重点实验室，河北 唐山
关键词: 未来时间观；购物导向；性别；大学生；Future Time Perspective； Shopping Orientation； Gender； College Students
摘要: 目的：探讨大学生未来时间观与购物导向的关系，并考察性别在其中的调节作用。方法：采取方便抽样法选取唐山市某所高校大学生1044名，使用消费者购物导向量表、津巴多时间观量表进行调查。结果：大学生未来时间观与享乐主义购物导向显著正相关(r = 0.08, P < 0.05)，大学生未来时间观与功利主义购物导向显著正相关(r = 0.28, P < 0.01)；性别在大学生未来时间观与购物导向关系中起调节作用，具体表现为相对女生而言，性别为男生时，未来时间观与享乐主义购物导向以及功利主义购物导向的关系更显著。结论：大学生未来时间观与享乐主义购物导向、功利主义购物导向的相关显著；大学生未来时间观可以正向预测购物导向，并且性别对未来时间观与购物导向具有调节作用。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the relationship between college students’ future time outlook and shopping orientation, and to investigate the moderating role of gender in it. Methods: A total of 1044 college students from a university in Tangshan City were selected by convenience sampling method, and the consumer shopping orientation scale and Zimbardo Time Observation Scale were used to investigate. Results: There was a significant positive correlation between college students’ future time outlook and hedonistic shopping orientation (r = 0.08, P < 0.05), and a significant positive correlation between college students’ future time outlook and utilitarian shopping orientation (r = 0.28, P < 0.01). Conclusion: There is a significant correlation between college students’ view of future time and hedonistic shopping orientation and utilitarian shopping orientation. College students’ view of future time can positively predict shopping orientation, and gender has a moderating effect on future time perception and shopping orientation.
文章引用：董茜, 吕少博 (2025). 大学生未来时间观与购物导向的关系：性别的调节作用. 心理学进展, 15(1), 148-155. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.151019

参考文献

[1] 曹元龙, 姜淑梅(2024). 大学生自我控制与睡前拖延的关系——基于未来时间洞察力的中介作用. 黑龙江科学, 15(17), 77-79.
[2] 邓广宽(2014). 消费者购物导向对其线上、线下购买意愿的影响机制研究. 硕士学位论文, 成都: 西南财经大学.
[3] 杜刚, 吕厚超(2016). 青少年未来时间洞察力和学业延迟满足的关系: 冲动性的中介作用. 集美大学学报, 17(5), 28-32.
[4] 黄希庭(2004). 论时间洞察力. 心理科学, 27(1), 5-7.
[5] 李董平, 张卫, 李霓霓, 等(2008). 未来时间洞察力、目标定向、社会联结与大学生学习适应. 心理发展与教育, 24(1), 60-65.
[6] 吕厚超, 黄希庭(2004). 时间洞察力的心理结构、特征及研究焦点. 心理科学, 27(5), 1037-1040.
[7] 吕厚超, 黄希庭(2005). 时间洞察力的概念及研究方法. 心理科学, 28(1), 166-169.
[8] 宋其争, 黄希庭(2003). 时间透视的研究现状. 心理科学, 26(3), 498-500.
[9] 王佳名, 张野, 张珊珊(2014). 师范生未来时间洞察力、学习倦怠与学业自我效能感的关系研究. 社会心理科学, (5), 24-28.
[10] 王奕冉, 程族桁(2016). 未来时间洞察力在高中生学习自我效能感与学习倦怠间的中介效应. 现代预防医学, 43(14), 2685-2688.
[11] 温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷(2005). 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用. 心理学报, 37(2), 268-274.
[12] 夏晓娟, 廖凤林(2009). 大学生时间洞察力、自我决定动机与学业拖沓关系探究. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), (s4), 68-75.
[13] 熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 等(2021). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展, 20(5), 757-769.
[14] 张云霞(2012). 大学生时间洞察力、学业延迟满足与学业拖延的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 兰州: 西北师范大学.
[15] 庄妍(2011). 大学生未来时间洞察力与学业延迟满足关系的研究. 教育理论与实践, (1), 42-45.
[16] Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work And/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 644-656.[CrossRef] 
[17] Bloch, P. H., & Bruce, G. D. (1984). Product Involvement as Leisure Behavior. In T. C. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 11, pp. 197-202). Association for Consumer Re-search.
[18] Bloch, P. H., & Richins, M. L. (1983). Shopping without Purchase: An Investigation of Consumer Browsing Behavior. In R. P. Bagozzi, & A. M. Tybout (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 10, pp. 389-393). Association for Consumer Research.
[19] Büttner, O. B., Florack, A., & Göritz, A. S. (2013). Shopping Orientation and Mindsets: How Motivation Influences Consumer Information Processing during Shopping. Psychology & Marketing, 30, 779-793.[CrossRef] 
[20] Cho, D. S., Reid, E. L., & Lee, H. Y. (2017). The Structural Relationships among Shopping Orientation, Perceived Value, Concentration, and Purchase Intention in Restaurant Mobile Commerce. Culinary Science & Hospitality Research, 23, 48-57.[CrossRef] 
[21] Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer Behavior (8th ed.). The Fryden Press.
[22] Gao, Y. (2011). Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 39, 729-736.[CrossRef] 
[23] Hansen, T., & Møller Jensen, J. (2009). Shopping Orientation and Online Clothing Purchases: The Role of Gender and Purchase Situation. European Journal of Marketing, 43, 1154-1170.[CrossRef] 
[24] Loketkrawee, P., & Bhatiasevi, V. (2018). Elucidating the Behavior of Consumers toward Online Grocery Shopping: The Role of Shopping Orientation. Journal of Internet Commerce, 17, 418-445.[CrossRef] 
[25] MacInnis, D. J., & Price, L. L. (1987). The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 473-491.[CrossRef] 
[26] Park, Y., & Yi, Y. (2019). When Free Gifts Hurt the Promoted Product: The In-fluence of Product-Gift Fit on Activating Persuasion Knowledge and Devaluating the Promoted Product. European Journal of Marketing, 53, 1423-1444.[CrossRef] 
[27] Sircova, A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Osin, E., Milfont, T. L., Fieulaine, N., Kislali-Erginbilgic, A. et al. (2014). A Global Look at Time: A 24-Country Study of the Equivalence of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Sage Open, 4, 1-12.[CrossRef] 
[28] Stone, G. P. (1954). City Shoppers and Urban Identification: Obser-vations on the Social Psychology of City Life. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 36-45.[CrossRef] 
[29] Sword, R. M., Sword, R. K. M., & Brunskill, S. R. (2015). Time Perspective Therapy: Transforming Zimbardo’s Temporal Theory into Clinical Practice. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, & W. van Beek (Eds.), Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application (pp. 481-498). Springer International Publishing.[CrossRef] 
[30] Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting Time in Perspec-tive: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288.[CrossRef]