基于“教学评一致性”建构小学语文学业质量评价体系
Constructing the Assessment System of Primary School Chinese Academic Quality Based on the “Consistency of Teaching, Studying and Assessment”
摘要: 课程标准是课程的指导性文件,是教材编写、教学实施以及教学评价的重要依据,反映了国家对人才培养的要求。“学业质量”板块是《义务教育语文课程标准(2022年版)》的重大突破,其中强调“教学评价一致性”可以为义务教育阶段小学语文学生学业质量评价提供良好的理论基础和操作框架。基于“教学评一致性”建构学生学业质量评价体系,有助于推动实际教学向学业质量标准靠近,进而实现课程目标,培养具有语文核心素养的全面发展的人。
Abstract: The curriculum standard is the programmatic document of the curriculum, the basis for the compilation of teaching materials, teaching and assessment, and reflects the requirements of the state for talent cultivation. “Academic Quality” is a major breakthrough in the “Curriculum Standards for Chinese Language Education in Compulsory Education (2022 Edition)”. “Consistency of teaching, studying and assessment” as a scientific and effective teaching evaluation approach can provide a favorable theoretical basis and operational framework for the evaluation of academic quality of primary school students of Chinese language education in the stage of compulsory education. Constructing the evaluation system of students’ academic quality based on “consistency of teaching, studying and assessment” is conducive to promoting actual teaching to approach the academic quality standards, thereby achieving the curriculum objectives and cultivating all-round developed individuals with core qualities.
文章引用:吴晗露. 基于“教学评一致性”建构小学语文学业质量评价体系[J]. 教育进展, 2025, 15(1): 1001-1008. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2025.151137

参考文献

[1] 李倩. 语文学业质量测评维度的建构[J]. 教育研究与评论, 2023(10): 24-29.
[2] 何秀萍. 基于“教学评一体化”的小学语文大单元教学探究[J]. 小学语文教师, 2022(11): 56-59.
[3] 杨向东. 素养本位学业质量的内涵及意义[J]. 全球教育展望, 2022, 51(5): 79-93.
[4] Kendall, J.S. and Marzano, R.J. (1995) The Systematic Identification and Articulation of Content Standard and Benchmarks. Mid-Continent Regional Educational Lab.
[5] 中华人民共和国教育部. 义务教育语文课程标准(2022年版) [S]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2022.
[6] 吴欣歆. 语文课标(2022年版): 彰显以文化人的价值导向[J]. 中小学管理, 2022(6): 16-19.
[7] 王晓娟. 语文课程学业质量标准描述要素及特点浅析——《义务教育语文课程标准(2022年版)》解读[J]. 教育实践与研究(B), 2023(Z1): 6-8.
[8] 柯孔标. 从三维目标到核心素养——《义务教育语文课程标准(2022年版)》解读之一[J]. 教学月刊小学版(语文), 2022(5): 4-7.
[9] Webb, N. and Madison, W. (1999) Alignment of Science and Mathematics Standards and Assessments in Four States. Education, 289, 559-569.
[10] Wisinski, J. and Yu, A. (2020) Is the Bloom Taxonomy Level of Student-Generated Exam-Style Questions Predictive of Exam Performance? The FASEB Journal, 34, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 崔允漷, 夏雪梅. “教-学-评一致性”: 意义与含义[J]. 中小学管理, 2013(1): 4-6.
[12] 王云生. “教、学、评”一体化的内涵与实施的探索[J]. 化学教学, 2019(5): 8-10, 16.
[13] 张婧恒. 课堂教学中“教-学-评一致性”研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2015.
[14] 杨新颖, 吴欣歆. 立足小学语文学业质量的逆向教学设计[J]. 语文建设, 2022(14): 15-19.
[15] 杨艳艳. 学期评价量规: 小学整本书阅读能力测评工具的实践探索[J]. 语文建设, 2022(14): 54-57.
[16] 张晓东. 基于“教-学-评”一致性的初高中学段衔接探究[J]. 新教育, 2023(19): 29-31.
[17] 王淑慧. 多元化教学评价的研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2011.
[18] 孙亚玲. 课堂教学有效性标准研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 华东师范大学, 2004.