数据交易市场价值共创机理研究——基于四方演化博弈研究
Research on the Mechanism of Value Co-Creation in Data Trading Market—Based on Four-Party Evolutionary Game Research
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.141429, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 孙陶陶:上海工程技术大学管理学院,上海
关键词: 数据交易市场价值共创演化博弈Data Exchange Markets Value Co-Creation Evolutionary Gaming
摘要: 为研究数据交易市场价值共创机理,构建“政府–数据供应主体–数据交易平台–数据使用主体”四方演化博弈模型,探究主体间的博弈演化关系和均衡稳定策略,并通过Matlab进行数值仿真分析。研究表明:政府在数据交易市场价值共创机制建设中担任监督角色,其决策会受到政治绩效、监管成本等因素的影响;当获得的增值服务收益大于增值服务成本时,数据供应主体会趋于积极参与价值共创;超额利润、口碑损失、政府补贴和处罚会影响到数据交易平台的策略方向选择;积极合作带来的收益大于成本时,数据使用主体也会倾向于积极参与价值共创。政府可通过建立互联互通的规范市场制度、多元共治的监管制度、合理的奖惩机制等,助力数据交易市场走向多方积极合作共赢的稳定进阶状态。
Abstract: In order to study the mechanism of value co-creation in the data trading market, we constructed a four-party evolutionary game model of “government-data supplying subject-data trading platform-data using subject”, explored the game evolution relationship and equilibrium stabilization strategy among the subjects, and carried out numerical simulation and analysis through Matlab. The study shows that: the government plays a supervisory role in the construction of value co-creation mechanism in the data trading market, and its decision-making will be affected by political performance, regulatory costs and other factors; when the benefit of value-added services is greater than the cost of value-added services, the data supply subjects will tend to actively participate in the value co-creation; the excess profit, loss of word-of-mouth, government subsidies and penalties will affect the selection of the strategic direction of the data trading platforms; when the benefits brought by active cooperation are greater than the costs, data-using subjects will also tend to actively participate in value co-creation. The government can help the data trading market to move towards a stable and progressive state of positive cooperation and win-win situation through the establishment of a standardized market system of interconnection and interoperability, a regulatory system of pluralistic and common governance, and a reasonable mechanism of rewards and punishments.
文章引用:孙陶陶. 数据交易市场价值共创机理研究——基于四方演化博弈研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(1): 3442-3459. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.141429

参考文献

[1] 孙陶陶, 何琦. 我国数据要素市场的知识基础、研究热点与前沿动态——基于CiteSpace的图谱量化研究[J]. 科技创新发展战略研究, 2024, 8(1): 57-70.
[2] 潘家栋, 储昊东. 数据要素交易市场构建的理论逻辑、现实困境与突破路径[J]. 学术交流, 2024(8): 105-117.
[3] 童楠楠, 张琳颖, 牛文倩. 我国数据交易市场建设: 实践进展、生命周期定位与推进对策[J]. 经济纵横, 2024(1): 93-100.
[4] Ramírez, R. (1999) Value Co-Production: Intellectual Origins and Implications for Practice and Research. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 49-65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 侯晓丽, 赵需要, 周庆山, 等. 政府开放数据生态链价值共创机理与节点优化策略研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2024, 47(5): 67-77.
[6] 赵龙文, 洪逸飞, 莫进朝. 政府开放数据价值共创过程及模式研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(10): 147-155.
[7] Neghina, C., Caniëls, M.C.J., Bloemer, J.M.M. and van Birgelen, M.J.H. (2015) Value Cocreation in Service Interactions: Dimensions and Antecedents. Marketing Theory, 15, 221-242.
[8] 朱俊达. 数据要素市场化配置下数据交易平台监管的双重要求及完善路径[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2024(5): 55-61.
[9] 温越, 吕本富, 张馨元, 等. 数据交易基础设施建设中政府规制与企业协同的博弈研究[J]. 管理评论, 2024, 36(6): 42-53.
[10] 吴江, 袁一鸣, 贺超城, 等. 数据要素交易多边平台研究: 现状、进路与框架[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2024, 14(3): 4-20.