临床常用眼压计研究进展
Research Progress on the Clinical Tonometers
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.151266, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 艾千禧, 葛希龙:暨南大学附属第一医院眼科,广东 广州;李 莉, 周奇志*:重庆市江北区爱尔眼科研究所,重庆;重庆眼视光眼科医院屈光手术科,重庆
关键词: 青光眼眼压计眼压Glaucoma Tonometers Intraocular Pressure
摘要: 青光眼是一种由于眼压异常增高导致的疾病,是全球范围内导致视力丧失的主要原因之一。其特征是眼压的病理性增高以及剧烈波动,对视神经和视网膜神经纤维进行压迫,随着病情进展,导致视神经的萎缩以及神经纤维的损伤,最终造成不可逆的视力损失以及视野缺损,居于全球首位不可逆致盲眼病,其发病机制与年龄、遗传、种族等因素有关,但尚未完全明确。青光眼不仅造成患者本身生活质量低下,也给患者家庭造成极大的经济卫生负担。及时有效地诊断和治疗青光眼是至关重要的,为了实现这一目标,眼压的准确测量显得尤为关键。眼压作为评估青光眼风险和跟踪病情变化的重要指标,其测量依赖眼压计。自19世纪以来,约有超过80种以上不同种类眼压计问世,至今有多种眼压计应用于临床,不同的测量设备各有其优势和特点。本文总结了目前临床上常用眼压计的特性,分析其各自的优缺点,并对国内尚未应用于临床的动态眼压监测设备的优点与存在问题进行分析,以期能够使临床医生针对不同情形选择合适的眼压测量设备。
Abstract: Glaucoma is a disease caused by abnormally high intraocular pressure (IOP) and is one of the leading causes of vision loss worldwide. Glaucoma is characterized by pathologically elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and dramatic fluctuations, which compresses the optic nerve and retinal nerve fibers. As the disease progresses, it leads to atrophy of the optic nerve and damage to the nerve fibers, and ultimately causes irreversible loss of vision and visual field defects, and is the world’s leading irreversible blinding eye disease, whose pathogenesis is related to age, heredity, and ethnicity, among other factors, and which is yet to be completely clarified. Glaucoma not only causes poor quality of life for the patients themselves, but also creates a great economic and health burden for their families. Timely and effective diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma is crucial, and to achieve this goal, accurate measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) is especially critical. Measurement of IOP, as an important indicator for assessing glaucoma risk and tracking changes in the condition, relies on tonometers. Since the 19th century, more than 80 different types of tonometers have been introduced, and up to date a wide range of tonometers are used in clinical practice, with each of the different measuring devices having its own advantages and characteristics. This article summarizes the characteristics of the commonly used tonometers in clinical practice, analyzes their respective advantages and disadvantages, and analyzes the advantages and problems of the dynamic intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring devices that have not yet been applied to clinical practice in China, with the aim of enabling clinicians to choose the appropriate IOP measurement devices for different situations.
文章引用:艾千禧, 李莉, 葛希龙, 周奇志. 临床常用眼压计研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(1): 1998-2006. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.151266

参考文献

[1] Tham, Y., Li, X., Wong, T.Y., Quigley, H.A., Aung, T. and Cheng, C. (2014) Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040. Ophthalmology, 121, 2081-2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Kass, M.A. (1996) Standardizing the Measurement of Intraocular Pressure for Clinical Research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. Ophthalmology, 103, 183-185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Egli, M., Goldblum, D., Kipfer, A., Rohrer, K., Tappeiner, C., Abegg, M., et al. (2011) Assessment of a New Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 96, 42-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] McCafferty, S., Levine, J., Schwiegerling, J. and Enikov, E.T. (2017) Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Error Relative to True Intracameral Intraocular Pressure in Vitro and in Vivo. BMC Ophthalmology, 17, Article No. 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Doughty, M.J. and Zaman, M.L. (2000) Human Corneal Thickness and Its Impact on Intraocular Pressure Measures. Survey of Ophthalmology, 44, 367-408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Kotecha, A., White, E., Schlottmann, P.G. and Garway-Heath, D.F. (2010) Intraocular Pressure Measurement Precision with the Goldmann Applanation, Dynamic Contour, and Ocular Response Analyzer Tonometers. Ophthalmology, 117, 730-737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Rüfer, F. (2011) Fehlerquellen bei der Goldmann-Applanationstonometrie. Der Ophthalmologe, 108, 546-552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 陈威, 周雪芬, 康宜华, 等. 眼内压检测技术研究进展[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2012, 12(5): 882-887.
[9] Grolman, B. (1972) A New Tonometer System. Optometry and Vision Science, 49, 646-660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Porwal, A.C., Shrishrimal, M., Punamia, R.P. and Mathew, B.C. (2023) Assessment of Intraocular Pressure Measurement between Goldman Applanation Tonometer, Rebound Tonometer, Non-Contact Tonometer, and Its Correlation with Central Corneal Thickness. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71, 1927-1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Chen, M., Zhang, L., Xu, J., Chen, X., Gu, Y., Ren, Y., et al. (2019) Comparability of Three Intraocular Pressure Measurement: iCare Pro Rebound, Non-Contact and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Different IOP Group. BMC Ophthalmology, 19, Article No. 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Kyei, S., Assiamah, F., Kwarteng, M.A. and Gboglu, C.P. (2020) The Association of Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measures by Non-Contact Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry among Glaucoma Patients. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 30, 999-1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Wang, P., Song, Y., Lin, F., Wang, Z., Gao, X., Cheng, W., et al. (2022) Comparison of Non-Contact Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Measurements in Non-Pathologic High Myopia. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, Article 819715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Luebke, J., Bryniok, L., Neuburger, M., Jordan, J.F., Boehringer, D., Reinhard, T., et al. (2019) Intraocular Pressure Measurement with Corvis ST in Comparison with Applanation Tonometry and Tomey Non-Contact Tonometry. International Ophthalmology, 39, 2517-2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Recep, Ö.F., Hasιripi, H., Çağιl, N. and Sarιkatipoğlu, H. (2001) Relation between Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measurement by Noncontact and Applanation Tonometry. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 27, 1787-1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Garzozi, H.J., Chung, H.S., Lang, Y., Kagemann, L. and Harris, A. (2001) Intraocular Pressure and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Comparison of Three Different Tonometers. Cornea, 20, 33-36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Gür Güngör, S., Akman, A., Küçüködük, A., Asena, L., Şimşek, C. and Yazici, A.C. (2016) Non-Contact and Contact Tonometry in Corneal Edema. Optometry and Vision Science, 93, 50-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Stock, R.A., Ströher, C., Sampaio, R.R., Mergener, R.A. and Bonamigo, E.L. (2021) A Comparative Study between the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and the Non-Contact Air-Puff Tonometer (Huvitz HNT 7000) in Normal Eyes. Clinical Ophthalmology, 15, 445-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Kontiola, A. (1997) A New Electromechanical Method for Measuring Intraocular Pressure. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 93, 265-276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Kageyama, M., Hirooka, K., Baba, T. and Shiraga, F. (2011) Comparison of iCare Rebound Tonometer with Noncontact Tonometer in Healthy Children. Journal of Glaucoma, 20, 63-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Realini, T., McMillan, B., Gross, R.L., Devience, E. and Balasubramani, G.K. (2021) Assessing the Reliability of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Rebound Tonometry. Journal of Glaucoma, 30, 629-633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Sachdeva, R., Iordanous, Y. and Lin, T. (2023) Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measured by iCare Tonometers and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 58, 426-432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Badakere, S.V., Chary, R., Choudhari, N.S., Rao, H.L., Garudadri, C. and Senthil, S. (2021) Agreement of Intraocular Pressure Measurement of iCare Ic200 with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Adult Eyes with Normal Cornea. Ophthalmology Glaucoma, 4, 89-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Gao, F., Liu, X., Zhao, Q. and Pan, Y. (2017) Comparison of the iCare Rebound Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 13, 1912-1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Kiddee, W. and Tanjana, A. (2020) Variations of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare Rebound Tonometer, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer in Patients with Corneal Edema after Phacoemulsification. Journal of Glaucoma, 30, 317-324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Rosentreter, A., Athanasopoulos, A., Schild, A.M., Lappas, A., Cursiefen, C. and Dietlein, T.S. (2013) Rebound, Applanation, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Pathologic Corneas. Cornea, 32, 313-318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Salvetat, M.L., Zeppieri, M., Miani, F., Tosoni, C., Parisi, L. and Brusini, P. (2011) Comparison of iCare Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Normal Corneas and in Eyes with Automated Lamellar and Penetrating Keratoplasty. Eye, 25, 642-650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Nakakura, S., Mori, E., Fujio, Y., Fujisawa, Y., Matsuya, K., Kobayashi, Y., et al. (2019) Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer iCare Ic100 and iCare TA01I or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. Journal of Glaucoma, 28, 172-177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Miki, A., Miki, A., Ieki, Y., Kiryu, J., Yaoeda, and Shirakashi, M. (2011) Central and Peripheral Intraocular Pressure Measured by a Rebound Tonometer. Clinical Ophthalmology, 5, 1113-1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Ve, R., Jose, J., Pai, H., Biswas, S., Parimi, V., Poojary, P., et al. (2020) Agreement and Repeatability of iCare Ic100 Tonometer. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 68, 2122-2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Rosenfeld, E., Barequet, D., Mimouni, M., Fischer, N. and Kurtz, S. (2021) Role of Home Monitoring with iCare ONE Rebound Tonometer in Glaucoma Patients Management. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 14, 405-408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Kanngiesser, H.E., Kniestedt, C. and Robert, Y.C.A. (2005) Dynamic Contour Tonometry: Presentation of a New Tonometer. Journal of Glaucoma, 14, 344-350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Katsimpris, J., Theoulakis, P., Vasilopoulos, K., Skourtis, G., Papadopoulos, G. and Petropoulos, I. (2015) Correlation between Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry or Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, 232, 414-418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Özcura, F., Yıldırım, N., Şahin, A., et al. (2015) Comparison of Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, Rebound Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 8, 299-304.
[35] Lee, S.Y., Kim, E.W., Choi, W., Park, C.K., Kim, S., Bae, H.W., et al. (2019) Significance of Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Evaluation of Progression of Glaucoma in Patients with a History of Laser Refractive Surgery. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 104, 276-281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] 周和政, 王瑾, 江文珊, 等. PASCAL动态轮廓眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计在非青光眼人群中眼压测量值的比较及一致性分析[J]. 临床眼科杂志, 2012, 20(4): 297-301.
[37] Sbordone, S., Ragucci, A., Iaccarino, G., Scognamiglio, G., Leone, A., Gironi Carnevale, U.A., et al. (2022) Comparison of IOP Obtained in Different Kind of Eyes with Contact and No Contact Tonometers. Oman Journal of Ophthalmology, 15, 315-320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Lanza, M., Rinaldi, M., Carnevale, U.A.G., di Staso, S., Sconocchia, M.B. and Costagliola, C. (2018) Analysis of Differences in Intraocular Pressure Evaluation Performed with Contact and Non-Contact Devices. BMC Ophthalmology, 18, Article No. 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] 韩芳, 杨军, 钟华. 眼脉动振幅在老年开角型青光眼与高眼压患者中的应用价值[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2016, 36(24): 6234-6236.
[40] Reznicek, L., Muth, D., Kampik, A., Neubauer, A.S. and Hirneiss, C. (2013) Evaluation of a Novel Scheimpflug-Based Non-Contact Tonometer in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Ocular Hypertension and Glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 97, 1410-1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Salvetat, M.L., Zeppieri, M., Tosoni, C., Felletti, M., Grasso, L. and Brusini, P. (2015) Corneal Deformation Parameters Provided by the Corvis-ST Pachy-Tonometer in Healthy Subjects and Glaucoma Patients. Journal of Glaucoma, 24, 568-574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Nakao, Y., Kiuchi, Y. and Okumichi, H. (2020) Evaluation of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Using Corvis ST and Comparison of the Corvis ST, Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Patients with Glaucoma. PLOS ONE, 15, e0238395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Joda, A.A., Shervin, M.M.S., Kook, D. and Elsheikh, A. (2015) Development and Validation of a Correction Equation for Corvis Tonometry. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 19, 943-953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Matsuura, M., Murata, H., Fujino, Y., Yanagisawa, M., Nakao, Y., Nakakura, S., et al. (2019) Repeatability of the Novel Intraocular Pressure Measurement from Corvis ST. Translational Vision Science & Technology, 8, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Eliasy, A., Chen, K., Vinciguerra, R., Maklad, O., Vinciguerra, P., Ambrósio, R., et al. (2018) Ex-Vivo Experimental Validation of Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Measurements on Human Eyes Using the Corvis ST. Experimental Eye Research, 175, 98-102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] 尹娜, 陈晓蓓, 周娜. Corvis ST校正眼压与Pentacam系统校正眼压的对比研究[J]. 临床眼科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 14-18.
[47] Ren, S., Xu, L., Fan, Q., Gu, Y. and Yang, K. (2021) Accuracy of New Corvis ST Parameters for Detecting Subclinical and Clinical Keratoconus Eyes in a Chinese Population. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 4962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[48] Martinez-de-la-Casa, J.M., Garcia-Feijoo, J., Fernandez-Vidal, A., Mendez-Hernandez, C. and Garcia-Sanchez, J. (2006) Ocular Response Analyzer versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry for Intraocular Pressure Measurements. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 47, 4410-4414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[49] Bayoumi, N.H.L., Bessa, A.S. and El Massry, A.A.K. (2010) Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Comparative Study of Findings. Journal of Glaucoma, 19, 627-631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[50] Shin, J., Kim, T.W., Park, S.J., Yoon, M. and Lee, J.W. (2015) Changes in Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea and Intraocular Pressure after Myopic Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Using a Femtosecond Laser for Flap Creation Determined Using Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Journal of Glaucoma, 24, 195-201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Zhang, H., Sun, Z., Li, L., Sun, R. and Zhang, H. (2020) Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer after Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Ophthalmology, 20, Article No. 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[52] 康杨, 胡琦, 李雪, 等. 利用眼反应分析仪评估FS-LASIK和LASEK术后角膜生物力学稳定性[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2018, 18(11): 2116-2118.
[53] Fujino, Y., Murata, H., Matsuura, M., Nakakura, S., Shoji, N., Nakao, Y., et al. (2020) The Relationship between Corneal Hysteresis and Progression of Glaucoma after Trabeculectomy. Journal of Glaucoma, 29, 912-917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[54] Kirgiz, A., Karaman Erdur, S., Atalay, K. and Gurez, C. (2019) The Role of Ocular Response Analyzer in Differentiation of Forme Fruste Keratoconus from Corneal Astigmatism. Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice, 45, 83-87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[55] Quaranta, L., Katsanos, A., Riva, I., Dastiridou, A., Oddone, F., Roberti, G., et al. (2016) Twenty-Four-Hour Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Perfusion Pressure Characteristics in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Normal Tension Glaucoma. Eye, 30, 1481-1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[56] Mosaed, S., Liu, J.H.K. and Weinreb, R.N. (2005) Correlation between Office and Peak Nocturnal Intraocular Pressures in Healthy Subjects and Glaucoma Patients. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 139, 320-324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[57] Rizq, R.N. (2001) Intraocular Pressure Measurement at the Choroid Surface: A Feasibility Study with Implications for Implantable Microsystems. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 85, 868-871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[58] Szurman, P., Gillmann, K., Seuthe, A., Dick, H.B., Hoffmann, E.M., Mermoud, A., et al. (2023) EYEMATE-SC Trial: Twelve-Month Safety, Performance, and Accuracy of a Suprachoroidal Sensor for Telemetric Measurement of Intraocular Pressure. Ophthalmology, 130, 304-312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[59] Dunbar, G.E., Shen, B. and Aref, A. (2017) The Sensimed Triggerfish Contact Lens Sensor: Efficacy, Safety, and Patient Perspectives. Clinical Ophthalmology, 11, 875-882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[60] Mottet, B., Aptel, F., Romanet, J., Hubanova, R., Pépin, J. and Chiquet, C. (2013) 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Rhythm in Young Healthy Subjects Evaluated with Continuous Monitoring Using a Contact Lens Sensor. JAMA Ophthalmology, 131, 1507-1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[61] Agnifili, L., Mastropasqua, R., Frezzotti, P., Fasanella, V., Motolese, I., Pedrotti, E., et al. (2014) Circadian Intraocular Pressure Patterns in Healthy Subjects, Primary Open Angle and Normal Tension Glaucoma Patients with a Contact Lens Sensor. Acta Ophthalmologica, 93, e14-e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[62] Tojo, N., Abe, S., Ishida, M., Yagou, T. and Hayashi, A. (2017) The Fluctuation of Intraocular Pressure Measured by a Contact Lens Sensor in Normal-Tension Glaucoma Patients and Nonglaucoma Subjects. Journal of Glaucoma, 26, 195-200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[63] 朱明善. 眼压检测及动态监测技术应用研究进展[J]. 中国医疗器械杂志, 2022, 46(1): 63-67.
[64] Otsuka, M., Hayashi, A. and Tojo, N. (2020) Questionnaire Survey on Complications during 24-H Measurement of Intraocular Pressure-Related Patterns with a Contact Lens Sensor. International Ophthalmology, 40, 1963-1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]