多量与少价——产品价格份量策略中的促销框架效应
Larger Portions and Lower Price—The Sales Promotion Framing Effects in the Product Price and Portion Strategy
摘要: 随着市场竞争的不断加剧,企业日益重视促销信息展示方式对消费者感知所产生的差异化影响。为探究产品价格与份量信息组合如何影响消费者的合算感知,本文首先对盒马“移山价”事件的相关新闻媒体报道、产品信息及消费者购后评论进行质性分析,将企业在促销活动中主要运用的价格份量策略归纳为“价格未满”与“份量溢出”两类。随后,依据前景理论和促销框架效应,构建了一个双中介模型,并通过三个情景实验探讨了价格份量策略对消费者合算感知的影响机制。研究结果表明:1) 与份量溢出策略相比,消费者对采用价格未满策略的产品感知更为合算;2) 价格未满策略通过增强消费者的损失厌恶、份量溢出策略通过提升消费者的决策信心影响消费者的合算感知;3) 价格竞争信号起调节作用。当促销信息中包含价格竞争信号时,价格未满策略进一步加剧了消费者的损失厌恶,份量溢出策略则进一步增强了消费者的决策信心。本文丰富了促销框架效应领域的研究,为企业深入理解消费者对促销活动的反应和运用促销框架有效影响消费者的合算感知提出了有针对性的营销策略与建议。
Abstract: As market competition continues to intensify, enterprises are increasingly recognizing the differential impacts that the presentation methods of promotional information have on consumer perception. This study aims to investigate how the integration of product pricing and portion information influences consumers’ Cost-Effective Perception. By conducting a qualitative analysis of news reports, product details, and consumer post-purchase reviews related to Hema’s “Yishan” event, we categorize the primary price and portion strategies utilized in promotional activities into two types: “price not full” and “portion overflow”. Based on the Prospect Theory and the Sales Promotion Framing Effects, this study subsequently constructed a dual-mediation model and carried out three scenario experiments to investigate the mediating effects of price portion strategies on consumers’ Cost-Effective Perception. The experiment results suggested that 1) in comparison with the portion overflow strategy, consumers perceive products adopting the price not full strategy as more cost-effective, 2) the price not full strategy heightens consumers’ Loss Aversion and the portion overflow strategy elevates consumers’ Decision-Making Confidence, thereby influencing their Cost-Effective Perception, and 3) the Price Competition Signal functions as a regulatory mechanism. Specifically, when the promotional information incorporates the Price Competition Signal, the price not full strategy further aggravates consumers’ Loss Aversion, while the portion overflow strategy further enhances consumers’ Decision-Making Confidence. This study enriches the research in the field of sales promotion framing effects, and also offers targeted marketing strategies and suggestions for enterprises to profoundly comprehend consumers’ responses to promotional activities and effectively impact consumers’ Cost-Effective Perception through promotional frameworks.
文章引用:王作展冰, 李宏. 多量与少价——产品价格份量策略中的促销框架效应[J]. 现代管理, 2025, 15(2): 15-29. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2025.152039

参考文献

[1] 石林. 基于“人货场”视角的生鲜业新零售企业商业模式创新探究——以盒马鲜生为例[J]. 投资与创业, 2024, 35(17): 25-27.
[2] 乐为, 韩笑, 尹洪娟. 属性框架下产品感知质量差异测量: 基于眼动追踪技术[J]. 管理工程学报, 2018, 32(4): 88-94.
[3] Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Pacheco, B.G. and Rahman, A. (2014) Effects of Sales Promotion Type and Promotion Depth on Consumer Perceptions: The Moderating Role of Retailer Reputation. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 25, 72-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Kramer, T. and Min Kim, H. (2007) Processing Fluency versus Novelty Effects in Deal Perceptions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 16, 142-147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 金立印. 促销活动效果比较研究——诱因类型, 获得时机和条件限制对促销效果的影响[J]. 管理评论, 2008, 20(8): 34-42.
[7] Monroe, K.B. (1973) Buyers’ Subjective Perceptions of Price. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 70-80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 张红星. 价格调整策略与包装规格调整的关系研究[J]. 商业经济研究, 2007(6): 124-126.
[9] Richards, T.J., Gómez, M.I. and Pofahl, G. (2012) A Multiple-Discrete/Continuous Model of Price Promotion. Journal of Retailing, 88, 206-225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1991) Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039-1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Tom, S.M., Fox, C.R., Trepel, C. and Poldrack, R.A. (2007) The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making under Risk. Science, 315, 515-518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Hajcak, G., Moser, J.S., Holroyd, C.B. and Simons, R.F. (2007) It’s Worse than You Thought: The Feedback Negativity and Violations of Reward Prediction in Gambling Tasks. Psychophysiology, 44, 905-912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Klapper, D., Ebling, C. and Temme, J. (2005) Another Look at Loss Aversion in Brand Choice Data: Can We Characterize the Loss Averse Consumer? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22, 239-254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Loomes, G. and Sugden, R. (1982) Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty. The Economic Journal, 92, 805-824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Peterson, D.K. and Pitz, G.F. (1988) Confidence, Uncertainty, and the Use of Information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 85-92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Pleskac, T.J. and Busemeyer, J.R. (2010) Two-Stage Dynamic Signal Detection: A Theory of Choice, Decision Time, and Confidence. Psychological Review, 117, 864-901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Liu, Z. (2024) The Asymmetric Impact of Decision-Making Confidence on Regret and Relief. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1365743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Nenkov, G.Y., Haws, K.L. and Kim, M.J. (2014) Fluency in Future Focus: Optimizing Outcome Elaboration Strategies for Effective Self-Control. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 769-776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 王新珠, 牛永革, 李蔚. 促销方式对质量感知的影响——基于解释一致效应与加工流畅性分析[J]. 软科学, 2016, 30(4): 4-22.
[20] Thaler, R. (1985) Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199-214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 韩睿, 田志龙. 促销类型对消费者感知及行为意向影响的研究[J]. 管理科学, 2005, 18(2): 85-91.
[22] 李巍, 王志章. 网络口碑发布平台对消费者产品判断的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2011, 8(9): 1345-1352.
[23] Coelho do Vale, R., Pieters, R. and Zeelenberg, M. (2008) Flying under the Radar: Perverse Package Size Effects on Consumption Self-Regulation. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 380-390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D. and Hayes, A.F. (2007) Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]