行为和情感学业拖延量表的中文版修订——基于CTT和IRT的检验

Revision of the Chinese Version of the Behavior and Emotion Academic Procrastination Scale^{—Examination Based on CTT and IRT}

摘要: 目的：对行为和情感学业拖延量表(Behavioral and Emotional Academic Procrastination Scale, BEPS)进行中文版修订，并在大学生群体中进行信效度检验。方法：使用中文版BEPS在983名大学生中进行施测，以Aitken拖延问卷，简版一般拖延量表，中国大五人格问卷简式版——神经质分量表作为效标工具。结果：中文版BEPS共6个条目，分为拖延行为和主观不适两个维度，6个条目质量良好，两因素模型拟合度良好(CFI = 0.997, TLI = 0.995, SRMR = 0.021, RMSEA = 0.025)。经典测量理论和项目反应理论均表明，中文版BEPS项目质量良好。中文版BEPS总量表和分量表均与Aitken拖延问卷，简版一般拖延量表，中国大五人格问卷简式版——神经质分量表呈现显著正相关。BEPS总分及各维度的Cronbach’s α在0.795~0.852之间，重测信度在0.721~0.867之间，且在不同的性别和年级群体中满足测量等值性。结论：中文版BEPS在大学生群体中信效度良好，可以作为测量学业拖延的有效测量工具。

Abstract: Purpose: To revise the Chinese version of the Behavioral and Emotional Academic Procrastination Scale (BEPS) and conduct reliability and validity tests among college students. Methods: The Chinese version of BEPS was administered to 983 college students. The Aitken Procrastination Questionnaire, the Brief General Procrastination Scale, and the Neuroticism sub-scale of the Chinese Big Five Personality Questionnaire Short Form were used as criterion-related tools. Results: The Chinese version of BEPS consists of 6 items, which are divided into two dimensions: procrastination behavior and subjective discomfort. All 6 items are of good quality, and the two-factor model has a good fit (CFI = 0.997, TLI = 0.995, SRMR = 0.021, RMSEA = 0.025). Both the Classical Test Theory and the Item Response Theory show that the items in the Chinese version of BEPS are of good quality. The total score of the Chinese version of BEPS and each scale is significantly positively correlated with the Aitken Procrastination Questionnaire, the Brief General Procrastination Scale, and the Neuroticism sub-scale of the Chinese Big Five Personality Questionnaire Short Form. The Cronbach’s α of the total score and each dimension of BEPS is between 0.795 and 0.852, and the test-retest reliability is between 0.721 and 0.867. Moreover, it satisfies the measurement of equivalence among different genders and grade groups. Conclusion: The Chinese version of BEPS has good reliability and validity among college students and can be used as an effective measurement tool for academic procrastination.