中欧能源话语中介入系统的对比研究

A Comparative Study of Engagement System in Energy Discourse of China and European Union

摘要: 能源是全球化进程中至关重要的动力，关系着国家的经济、政治和战略安全。中国与欧盟在能源方面具备广泛合作空间。本文基于马丁的评价理论，选取中国和欧盟主流媒体的能源与环境英文报道为语料，利用UAM Corpus Tool3.3软件对语料中的介入系统进行手工批注，对数据进行标准化及差异性检验后发现，欧盟使用介入资源的频率更高，选择类型更多样。在话语收缩层面，中国使用的否认资源与宣告资源的频率相近，而欧盟倾向于使用更多的否认资源来展示观点。否认资源中，欧盟使用的反驳资源和否定资源均高于中国，宣告资源中，欧盟使用的宣布资源频率比中国高，但否认资源中，中国高于欧盟。话语扩展层面，中欧使用的包容资源都多于归属资源，且欧盟使用的包容资源频率高于中国，其原因可以归结于不同的政治体制、文化历史与媒监管境多方面。本研究丰富了基于评价理论的新闻话语对比分析的研究对象和研究语料，为介入系统理论框架的应用提供新的实践范例，帮助读者从评价理论的角度理解能源报道的更深层次的意义，唤起公众对能源和环境问题的关注。

Abstract: Energy is a vital driving force in the process of globalization and is related to the economic, political and strategic security of countries. China and the European Union have lots of opportunities to cooperate on energy issues. Based on Martin’s appraisal theory, this paper selected English reports on energy and environment from mainstream media in China and the European Union as the Corpus. UAM Corpus Tool3.3 software was used to manually annotate engagement system in the corpus. After data standardization and difference test, it was found that engagement resources were used more frequently in the European Union and the selection types were more diverse. At the level of dialogic contraction, the frequency of disclaim resources used by China is similar to that of proclaim resources, while the EU tends to use more disclaim resources to show different views. Among the disclaim resources, the EU uses more counter resources and deny resources than China. Among the proclaim resources, the EU uses more pronounce resources than China, but among the disclaim resources, China uses more than the EU. At the level of dialogic expansion, both China and Europe use more entertain resources than attribute resources, and the frequency of entertain resources used by the EU is higher than that of China, which can be attributed to different political systems, cultural history and media regulatory environment. This study has enriched the research objects and research corpus for the comparative analysis of news discourse based on appraisal theory, provided a new practical example for the application of the theoretical framework of engagement system, helped readers to understand the deeper meaning of energy reporting from the perspective of appraisal theory, and aroused the public's attention to energy and environmental issues.