零售商反向补贴下供应链成员的策略博弈分析
Strategic Game Analysis of Supply Chain Members under Retailer Reverse Subsidy
摘要: 在供应链管理中,反向补贴是指零售商为获得更优惠的产品条件或其他利益而向制造商支付一定费用的行为。实际上,这种反向补贴可以被视为一种合作形式,因为它通过利益分配使双方均能受益。本文构建了一个包含单一制造商和单一零售商的两级供应链激励模型,旨在通过考虑零售商对制造商的反向补贴,优化双方的合作关系。在该模型中,制造商和零售商通过Nash均衡实现各自利益最大化的决策目标,其中制造商决定是否研发绿色技术,而零售商则决定是否提供补贴,以寻找最优策略组合。通过对供应链的Stackelberg博弈分析,本文确定了制造商的最优投入成本和零售商的补贴范围,为双方提供了实现利益最大化的最优策略建议。最后,通过数值仿真分析了零售商补贴系数对批发价、零售价、研发水平、以及制造商和零售商利润的影响。
Abstract: In supply chain management, a reverse subsidy is a payment made by a retailer to a manufacturer in order to obtain more favorable product terms or other benefits. In fact, this reverse subsidy can be regarded as a form of cooperation because it benefits both parties through the distribution of benefits. In this paper, we construct a two-level supply chain incentive model containing a single manufacturer and a single retailer, aiming to optimize their cooperative relationship by considering the retailer’s reverse subsidy to the manufacturer. In this model, the manufacturer and the retailer achieve their respective profit maximization decision objectives through Nash equilibrium, in which the manufacturer decides whether to develop green technologies or not and the retailer decides whether to provide subsidies or not to find the optimal strategy combination. Through the Stackelberg game analysis of the supply chain, this paper determines the optimal input cost of the manufacturer and the subsidy range of the retailer, and provides the optimal strategy suggestions for both parties to maximize their interests. Finally, the effects of retailer subsidy coefficients on wholesale price, retail price, R&D level, and profits of manufacturers and retailers are analyzed through numerical simulation.
文章引用:李楠楠, 李佳佳. 零售商反向补贴下供应链成员的策略博弈分析[J]. 建模与仿真, 2025, 14(2): 72-80. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2025.142132

参考文献

[1] Qorri, A., Mujkić, Z., Gashi, S. and Kraslawski, A. (2018) Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Company Performance: A Meta-Analysis Approach. Procedia Manufacturing, 17, 317-325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 林志炳, 郭耿, 陈蕾雯. 不同商业模式下绿色制造商的渠道入侵策略研究[J/OL]. 系统科学与数学: 1-20.
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=YBmesx2FU7lkoN-01o71IEnCFvh69QZkFTP5y__47bcc5wT98g52NlbtAPDfahvazZ2RXSIYUQSUSL5R0a1nuN1q-O2W41g15SyWI6dnasAjv6p3UQ7ob84Rgk6AHJIqzaITDP3TSBzXdGZh39GEcv1bssZTPcGBXchGot8yENI9DL7TdJFZrZ8QyOcG_yaj&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS, 2024-12-24.
[3] 孙嘉轶, 龙琦, 滕春贤. 自主创新VS.技术外取: 考虑研发能力的绿色供应链研发策略与合同设计[J/OL]. 中国管理科学: 1-23. 2024-12-24.[CrossRef
[4] Krass, D., Nedorezov, T. and Ovchinnikov, A. (2013) Environmental Taxes and the Choice of Green Technology. Production and Operations Management, 22, 1035-1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 俞园园, 吴南倩, 文学舟. 制造商数字化转型视角下的双渠道绿色供应链决策研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2024, 44(11): 192-199.
[6] 晋盛武, 沈丹婷, 庄德林. 渠道与产品差异下的供应链技术创新协同策略[J]. 技术经济, 2016, 35(3): 123-130.
[7] 王海军, 张瑞娜, 郭羽洪, 杨明. 零售商补贴对供应链可靠性协调策略影响研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2021, 35(4): 190-201.
[8] Bo, H., Chen, Y., Li, H., Han, P. and Qi, L. (2021) Time-Sensitive Supply Chain Disruption Recovery and Resource Sharing Incentive Strategy. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 6, 165-176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 许格妮, 陈惠汝, 武晓莉, 等. 竞争供应链中绿色成本分担博弈分析[J]. 系统工程学报, 2020, 35(2): 244-256.
[10] 林强, 刘名武. 同时考虑政府补贴与企业成本分担的绿色供应链决策[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(6): 29-38.
[11] Limon, Y., Martagan, T. and Krishnamurthy, A. (2023) Contracts for Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Based on Production Cost and Capabilities. International Journal of Production Research, 62, 2640-2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 孙华丽, 李泽平, 张鑫. 供应中断下考虑备份供应商采购的贷款援助决策[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 28(6): 921-931.
[13] 徐豪, 陈柳鑫, 杨建超, 等. 基于动态微分博弈的供应链产品创新成本分担机制与政府补贴机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2024, 33(9): 42-48.
[14] 徐健腾, 张新远, 武悦. 基于制造商补贴的二级全渠道供应链协调策略研究[J/OL]. 工业工程与管理: 1-17.
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=YBmesx2FU7mXXYMJEn_rSvfrpD13j-gFZIW5qqZO86YGgeBsYSU34B5HC1q6cCx9WuZEyrfRRvh4AxjNVLKqs-OeNNkkopxPmxQgPtTIxj2QmOqP0p7krlB8DsvCJUQ0BioGokwPFk8Y6307vkLZ5wCDonyJ8s6Qi7vTUBlEmtjDucGxxNSeyMmxmvdIKLuX&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS, 2025-01-10].
[15] 姚锋敏, 杜文莉, 孙嘉轶. ESG视角下考虑绿色设计的低碳供应链定价及补贴策略[J/OL]. 系统科学与数学: 1-20.
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=YBmesx2FU7l9fKjCleROHpsLvqswAmAYD067-9239TTDE5fBHw-rFPzzUiseZB_qWHTd0m5EbNSHb-g9FpMhgcspqW7XIbFRyH5nA6tdb_ahKtLMPfEdLHUSEgomKzjnfT-4igwmNIaQvzM2EtPqoi7jcxw8VA4fnnrZlK7KeoiaT39tQgnrySpoJH3Tdkf5&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS, 2025-01-10.
[16] 刘英, 甄学平, 刘斌. 必需品供应链中断的政府激励模型研究[J]. 江苏科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 35(3): 75-83.
[17] 周姝娅. 零售商营销努力与政府补贴政策下新能源汽车供应链协同创新决策研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2020.
[18] 李梦祺, 李登峰, 南江霞. 考虑链间竞争与链内研发成本共担的绿色供应链决策——基于非合作-合作两型博弈方法[J/OL]. 中国管理科学: 1-13. 2023-04-17.[CrossRef
[19] 刘丙泉, 郑湘儒, 常旭冉, 孟令奇, 郝红文. 考虑产品绿色度和营销努力的制造供应链成本分担契约研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 38(2): 90-97.