词汇信息和语境信息在中文词汇加工中的作用
The Role of Lexical Information and Contextual Information in Chinese Word Processing
摘要: 在各种词汇信息和语境信息中，词频、词长和词的预测性是三种对于词汇加工影响最大的因素，无论在字母文字还是中文里都有着普遍的作用，而中文相比较于字母文字有着显著的不同，中文里的字频、笔画数、词素位置概率等因素也会产生独特的影响。词汇识别和词切分是词汇加工的两个主要成分，通过总结和探讨词频、词长和词的预测性这三大因素以及其他独特的因素对于词汇识别和词切分的影响，深入了解中文词汇加工的特殊之处，为中文词汇加工的机制给出启示。
Abstract: Word frequency, word length and word predictability have a general impact on reading, while Chinese is significantly different from Alphabetical language, and their word processing mechanisms can’t be generalized. Word recognition and word segmentation, as the two components of word processing, can be summarized and discussed by summarizing and discussing the effects of word frequency, word length and word predictability and the interaction among them on Chinese word recognition and word segmentation. In-depth understanding of the special features and mechanisms of Chinese word processing can provide inspiration for the improvement of Chinese reading model.
文章引用：周一浩 (2025). 词汇信息和语境信息在中文词汇加工中的作用. 心理学进展, 15(2), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.152080

参考文献

[1] 白学军, 胡笑羽, 闫国利(2009). 中文阅读的副中央凹-中央凹效应: 词n的语义透明度对词n-1加工的影响. 心理学报, 41(5), 377-386.
[2] 白学军, 李馨, 闫国利(2015). 汉语阅读眼动控制: 20年研究的总结. 心理发展与教育, 31(1), 85-91.
[3] 曹海波, 兰泽波, 高峰, 于海涛, 李鹏, 王敬欣(2023). 词素位置概率在中文阅读中的作用: 词汇判断和眼动研究. 心理学报, 55(2), 159-176.
[4] 常敏(2021). 汉语阅读中预测加工认知机制的眼动研究. 博士学位论文, 天津: 天津师范大学.
[5] 陈朝阳, 刘志方, 苏永强, 程亚华(2018). 高低阅读技能聋生词汇加工的语境预测性效应特点: 眼动证据. 心理发展与教育, 34(6), 692-699.
[6] 符颖(2018). 中文阅读中词长及词长与词频的眼动研究. 硕士学位论文, 天津: 天津师范大学.
[7] 李兴珊, 刘萍萍, 马国杰(2011). 中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评. 心理科学进展, 19(4), 459-470.
[8] 李亚(2016). 词长和语境可预测性对中文句子阅读中词跳读影响的眼动研究. 硕士学位论文, 长沙: 湖南师范大学.
[9] 梁菲菲, 冯琳琳, 刘瑛, 李馨, 白学军(2024). 阅读伴随词汇学习的词切分: 首、尾词素位置概率的不同作用. 心理学报, 56(3), 281-294.
[10] 刘妮娜, 王霞, 刘志方, 闫国利(2020). 词汇预测性对中文高、低阅读技能儿童眼动行为的影响. 心理科学, 43(6), 1369-1375.
[11] 刘志方, 仝文, 张智君, 赵亚军(2020). 语境预测性对阅读中字词加工过程的影响: 眼动证据. 心理学报, 52(9), 1031-1047.
[12] 刘志方, 闫国利, 张智君, 潘运, 杨桂芳(2013). 中文阅读中的预视效应与词切分. 心理学报, 45(6), 614-625.
[13] 卢张龙, 白学军, 闫国利(2008). 汉语词汇识别中词频和可预测性交互作用的眼动研究. 心理研究, 1(4), 29-33.
[14] 鹿子佳, 符颖, 张慢慢, 臧传丽, 白学军(2022). 中文词类信息在副中央凹中的加工. 心理学报, 54(5), 441-452.
[15] 任梦雪, 田宏杰, 仝文, 刘志方(2020). 年老化对中文阅读眼动控制的影响: 来自词长和语境预测性效应的证据. 心理学探新, 40(5), 417-424.
[16] 宋悉妮, 徐晓晨, 杨秀莉, 孙桂苓, 崔磊(2022). 预期性、词频和笔画数对中文词汇识别影响的眼动研究. 心理科学, 45(5), 1061-1068.
[17] 苏衡, 刘志方, 曹立人(2016). 中文阅读预视加工中的词频和预测性效应及其对词切分的启示: 基于眼动的证据. 心理学报, 48(6), 625-636.
[18] 王敬欣, 赵赛男, 徐倩倩(2023). 字间空格与词频对青年人和老年人阅读的影响: 眼动研究. 心理发展与教育, 39(6), 781-787.
[19] 现代汉语常用词表课题组(2008). 现代汉语常用词表. 商务印书馆.
[20] 闫国利, 王丽红, 巫金根, 白学军(2011). 不同年级学生阅读知觉广度及预视效益的眼动研究. 心理学报, 43(3), 249-263.
[21] 杨群, 王艳, 张积家(2019). 正字法深度对汉族、维吾尔族大学生汉字词命名的影响. 心理学报, 51(1), 1-13.
[22] 臧传丽, 鹿子佳, 张志超(2019). 语义和句法信息在副中央凹加工中的作用. 心理科学进展, 27(1), 11-19.
[23] 张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽(2022). 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应. 心理与行为研究, 20(3), 304-310.
[24] 张慢慢, 臧传丽, 白学军, 闫国利(2020). 先前语境与随后副中央凹预视在词跳读中的相对作用. 心理科学进展, 43(5), 1058-1064.
[25] 章玉祉, 张积家(2014). 汉语言语产生中的词长效应. 心理学报, 46(9), 1232-1241.
[26] 赵冰洁, 王永胜, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军(2018). 双字词整词加工与词素加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用. 心理与行为研究, 16(6), 721-734.
[27] Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading Spaced and Unspaced Chinese Text: Evidence from Eye Movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1277-1287.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Clifton, C., Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Inhoff, A. W., Liversedge, S. P., Reichle, E. D. et al. (2016). Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: Keith Rayner’s 40 Year Legacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 1-19.[CrossRef] 
[29] Cui, L., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Cong, F., Zhang, W., & Hyönä, J. (2021). Compound Word Frequency Modifies the Effect of Character Frequency in Reading Chinese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 610-633.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Dambacher, M., Kliegl, R., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Frequency and Predictability Effects on Event-Related Potentials during Reading. Brain Research, 1084, 89-103.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Dank, J. H. (1983). Comprehension Process in Oral Reading. In G. B. Flores, d’Arcans, & R. J. Jarvella (Eds.), The Process of Language Understanding. Wiley.
[32] Delong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., Groppe, D. M., & Kutas, M. (2011). Overlapping Dual ERP Responses to Low Cloze Probability Sentence Continuations. Psychophysiology, 48, 1203-1207.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Parallel Graded Attention Models of Reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Eye Movements (pp. 787-800). Oxford University Press.
[34] Frisson, S., Harvey, D. R., & Staub, A. (2017). No Prediction Error Cost in Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 200-214.[CrossRef] 
[35] Gu, J., & Li, X. (2015). The Effects of Character Transposition within and across Words in Chinese Reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 272-281.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Guan, C. Q., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2020). Cross-Linguistic Word Recognition Development among Chinese Children: A Multilevel Linear Mixed-Effects Modeling Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 544.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Haeuser, K. I., & Kray, J. (2022). How Odd: Diverging Effects of Predictability and Plausibility Violations on Sentence Reading and Word Memory. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43, 1193-1220.[CrossRef] 
[38] Hand, C. J., Miellet, S., O'Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2010). The Frequency-Predictability Interaction in Reading: It Depends Where You're Coming From. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1294-1313.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] He, L., Song, Z., Chang, M., Zang, C., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2021). Contrasting Off‐Line Segmentation Decisions with On‐Line Word Segmentation during Reading. British Journal of Psychology, 112, 662-689.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Huang, H., Lee, C., Tsai, J., Lee, C., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J.-L. (2006). Orthographic Neighborhood Effects in Reading Chinese Two-Character Words. NeuroReport, 17, 1061-1065.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Huang, L., & Li, X. (2020). Early, but Not Overwhelming: The Effect of Prior Context on Segmenting Overlapping Ambiguous Strings When Reading Chinese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 1382-1395.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Huang, L., Staub, A., & Li, X. (2021). Prior Context Influences Lexical Competition When Segmenting Chinese Overlapping Ambiguous Strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 118, Article 104218.[CrossRef] 
[43] Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The Perceptual Span and Oculomotor Activity during the Reading of Chinese Sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 20-34.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Kuperberg, G. R., Brothers, T., & Wlotko, E. W. (2020). A Tale of Two Positivities and the N400: Distinct Neural Signatures Are Evoked by Confirmed and Violated Predictions at Different Levels of Representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32, 12-35.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Li, M., Gao, X., Chou, T., & Wu, J. (2017). Neighborhood Frequency Effect in Chinese Word Recognition: Evidence from Naming and Lexical Decision. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 227-245.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Li, M., Lin, W., Chou, T., Yang, F., & Wu, J. (2015). The Role of Orthographic Neighborhood Size Effects in Chinese Word Recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44, 219-236.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An Integrated Model of Word Processing and Eye-Movement Control during Chinese Reading. Psychological Review, 127, 1139-1162.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[48] Li, X., Huang, L., Yao, P., & Hyönä, J. (2022). Universal and Specific Reading Mechanisms across Different Writing Systems. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 133-144.[CrossRef] 
[49] Li, X., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye Movement Guidance in Chinese Reading: Is There a Preferred Viewing Location? Vision Research, 51, 1146-1156.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[50] Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the Segmentation of Chinese Words during Reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 525-552.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Liang, F., Gao, Q., Li, X., Wang, Y., Bai, X., & Liversedge, S. P. (2023). The Importance of the Positional Probability of Word Final (But Not Word Initial) Characters for Word Segmentation and Identification in Children and Adults’ Natural Chinese Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49, 98-115.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[52] Liu, P., & Li, X. (2014). Inserting Spaces before and after Words Affects Word Processing Differently in Chinese: Evidence from Eye Movements. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 57-68.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[53] Liu, Y., Guo, S., Yu, L., & Reichle, E. D. (2018). Word Predictability Affects Saccade Length in Chinese Reading: An Evaluation of the Dynamic-Adjustment Model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1891-1899.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[54] Liu, Z., Liu, X., Tong, W., & Fu, F. (2020). Word’s Contextual Predictability and Its Character Frequency Effects in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1833.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[55] Liu, Z., Tong, W., & Su, Y. (2019). Interaction Effects of Aging, Word Frequency, and Predictability on Saccade Length in Chinese Reading. PeerJ, 8, e8860.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[56] Liversedge, S. P., Drieghe, D., Li, X., Yan, G., Bai, X., & Hyönä, J. (2016). Universality in Eye Movements and Reading: A Trilingual Investigation. Cognition, 147, 1-20.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[57] Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., Zhang, M., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Drieghe, D. (2014). The Effect of Visual Complexity and Word Frequency on Eye Movements during Chinese Reading. Visual Cognition, 22, 441-457.[CrossRef] 
[58] Lu, Z., Bai, X., & Yan, G. (2008). Eye Movement Study on the Interaction between Word Frequency and Predictability in the Recognition of Chinese Words. Psychological Research, 1, 29-33.
[59] Ma, G., Li, X., & Rayner, K. (2014). Word Segmentation of Overlapping Ambiguous Strings during Chinese Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1046-1059.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[60] Miellet, S., Sparrow, L., & Sereno, S. C. (2007). Word Frequency and Predictability Effects in Reading French: An Evaluation of the E-Z Reader Model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 762-769.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[61] Nieuwland, M. S., Barr, D. J., Bartolozzi, F., Busch-Moreno, S., Darley, E., Donaldson, D. I. et al. (2019). Dissociable Effects of Prediction and Integration during Language Comprehension: Evidence from a Large-Scale Study Using Brain Potentials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375, Article 20180522.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[62] Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of Contextual Constraint on Eye Movements in Reading: A Further Examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 504-509.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[63] Rayner, K., Li, X., Juhasz, B. J., & Yan, G. (2005). The Effect of Word Predictability on the Eye Movements of Chinese Readers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1089-1093.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[64] Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The Effect of Word Frequency, Word Predictability, and Font Difficulty on the Eye Movements of Young and Older Readers. Psychology and Aging, 21, 448-465.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[65] Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Eye Movements and Word Skipping during Reading: Effects of Word Length and Predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 514-528.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[66] Reichle, E. D. (2011). Serial-Attention Models of Reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Eye Movements (pp. 767-786). Oxford University Press.
[67] Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Drieghe, D., Blythe, H. I., Joseph, H. S. S. L., White, S. J. et al. (2013). Using E-Z Reader to Examine the Concurrent Development of Eye-Movement Control and Reading Skill. Developmental Review, 33, 110-149.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[68] Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). E-Z Reader: A Cognitive-Control, Serial-Attention Model of Eye-Movement Behavior during Reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 4-22.[CrossRef] 
[69] Shen, D., Liversedge, S. P., Tian, J., Zang, C., Cui, L., Bai, X. et al. (2012). Eye Movements of Second Language Learners When Reading Spaced and Unspaced Chinese Text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 192-202.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[70] Shen, W., & Li, X. (2012). The Uniqueness of Word Superiority Effect in Chinese Reading. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57, 3414-3420.[CrossRef] 
[71] Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2018). Beyond Cloze Probability: Parafoveal Processing of Semantic and Syntactic Information during Reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 100, 1-17.[CrossRef] 
[72] Wei, W., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2013). Word Properties of a Fixated Region Affect Outgoing Saccade Length in Chinese Reading. Vision Research, 80, 1-6.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[73] Xiong, J., Yu, L., Veldre, A., Reichle, E. D., & Andrews, S. (2023). A Multitask Comparison of Word-and Character-Frequency Effects in Chinese Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49, 793-811.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[74] Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., & Rayner, K. (2006). The Effect of Word and Character Frequency on the Eye Movements of Chinese Readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 259-268.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[75] Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E. M., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H. (2010). Flexible Saccade-Target Selection in Chinese Reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 705-725.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[76] Yan, M., Richter, E. M., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Readers of Chinese Extract Semantic Information from Parafoveal Words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561-566.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[77] Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Lexical and Sublexical Semantic Preview Benefits in Chinese Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1069-1075.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[78] Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2015). Perceptual Span Depends on Font Size during the Reading of Chinese Sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 209-219.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[79] Yang, J., Wang, S., Tong, X., & Rayner, K. (2012). Semantic and Plausibility Effects on Preview Benefit during Eye Fixations in Chinese Reading. Reading and Writing, 25, 1031-1052.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[80] Yao, P., Staub, A., & Li, X. (2022). Predictability Eliminates Neighborhood Effects during Chinese Sentence Reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 243-252.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[81] Zang, C. (2019). New Perspectives on Serialism and Parallelism in Oculomotor Control during Reading: The Multi-Constituent Unit Hypothesis. Vision, 3, Article 50.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[82] Zang, C., Fu, Y., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2018). Investigating Word Length Effects in Chinese Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 1831-1841.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[83] Zang, C., Liang, F., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Interword Spacing and Landing Position Effects during Chinese Reading in Children and Adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 720-734.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[84] Zang, C., Zhang, M., Bai, X., Yan, G., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). Effects of Word Frequency and Visual Complexity on Eye Movements of Young and Older Chinese Readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1409-1425.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[85] Zhang, Q., Huang, K., & Li, X. (2024). Competition between Parts and Whole: A New Approach to Chinese Compound Word Processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 50, 479-497.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[86] Zhou, J., & Li, X. (2021). On the Segmentation of Chinese Incremental Words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47, 1353-1368.[CrossRef] [PubMed]