文化消费背景下文化场馆消费者的隐私保护研究
A Study on Privacy Protection of Cultural Venue Consumers in the Context of Cultural Consumption
摘要: 在人工智能蓬勃发展的时代,文化消费领域历经深刻变革,结构发生显著变化。智能化带来了新消费形式,凭借大数据分析、智能推荐等技术,精准匹配消费者需求,拓展消费渠道,提升消费体验,推动文化消费增长。然而,这一发展过程并非一帆风顺,科技进步与伦理规范间的矛盾逐渐显现,隐私问题格外突出。文化消费属于精神层面的活动,对信息载体的依赖程度远超物质消费,致使隐私保护面临更大挑战。实际消费中,消费者隐私信息易泄露,隐私权益受损,面对侵权时,常因举证难、维权流程繁琐,难以有效维权。深入剖析文化场馆对消费者隐私信息的利用情况,不仅有助于完善文化消费领域隐私保护的理论体系,为后续研究提供新的视角与数据支撑,还能提出针对性的改进措施,在实践中切实解决消费者隐私保护难题,助力文化消费市场的健康、可持续发展。
Abstract: In the era of booming artificial intelligence, the field of cultural consumption has undergone deep transformations and marked structural changes. The new form of consumption brought about by intelligence, by virtue of big data analysis, intelligent recommendation and other technologies, accurately matches consumer demand, expands consumption channels, improves the consumer experience and promotes the growth of cultural consumption. However, this development process has not been easy, and the contradiction between technological progress and ethical norms has gradually appeared, with the privacy issue being particularly prominent. Cultural consumption is a spiritual activity that relies on information vehicles to a much greater degree than material consumption, making privacy protection a bigger challenge. In actual consumption, consumers’ personal information is easily leaked, their privacy rights are damaged, and when they face infringement of rights, they often find it difficult to effectively defend their rights due to the difficult evidence and complicated process of defense. In-depth analysis of the utilization of consumer privacy information by cultural venues not only helps to improve the theoretical system of privacy protection in the field of cultural consumption, provides new perspectives and data support for subsequent research, but also puts forward targeted improvement measures, which can effectively solve the problem of consumer privacy protection in practice and help the healthy and sustainable development of the cultural consumption market.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
让∙鲍德里亚. 消费社会[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2001: 7.
|
|
[2]
|
尹可昕. 我国文化消费的社会分层、民族主义与民族文化商品消费偏好[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉轻工大学, 2021.
|
|
[3]
|
花建. 提升数字文化消费新机制——FCS研究框架、三大维度和提升重点[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2023, 25(6): 15-27.
|
|
[4]
|
李莉莉, 张凯. 文旅融合背景下公共文化场馆发展路径研究[J]. 文化创新比较研究, 2024, 8(8): 95-99.
|
|
[5]
|
吴高. 人工智能时代公共数字文化服务个人隐私保护的困境与对策[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2021(10): 39-45, 54.
|
|
[6]
|
吴宁博, 李迪, 杨帆, 等. 我国省级公共图书馆用户隐私风险及其治理策略[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2024(9): 36-45.
|
|
[7]
|
吴亮. 商业机构用户画像应用的政府治理责任研究[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 30(1): 63-75.
|
|
[8]
|
[美]帕斯夸里. 黑箱社会 控制金钱和信息的数据法则[M]. 北京: 中信出版集团, 2015: 13.
|
|
[9]
|
刘璇. 人工智能时代的文化消费隐私保护研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2024.
|
|
[10]
|
张晓新, 刘龙垚. 图书馆分群体个人信息立法策略研究[J]. 四川图书馆学报, 2021(4): 45-49.
|
|
[11]
|
田淑娴, 许春漫. 国外图书馆网站隐私政策文本分析与启示[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2017(10): 26-30.
|
|
[12]
|
彭涛. 数字政府中个人数据保护的法律规则转换[J]. 法学, 2024(4): 47-61.
|
|
[13]
|
孙丽岩. 政府收集个人数据的合理限度[J]. 政法论坛, 2024, 42(3): 89-101.
|