机器人与腹腔镜治疗直肠癌:手术预后及手术并发症等的Meta分析
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Complications
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.152552, PDF,   
作者: 常 浩:青岛大学附属医院胃肠外科,山东 青岛
关键词: 直肠癌腹腔镜机器人手术预后Rectal Cancer Laparoscopic Robotic Surgical Outcomes
摘要: 手术一直是直肠癌治疗的基石,旨在切除肿瘤和尽可能保留肠道功能。腹腔镜手术已越发进入大众视野,机器人手术作为传统方法的微创替代方案。然而,传统腹腔镜手术在器械的移动性和灵巧性方面面临限制。另一方面,机器人方法通过为外科医生提供更好的精度、三维高清视图和卓越的组织操作能力来增强这些方面,使其成为直肠癌治疗越来越受欢迎的选择。我们进行此项Meta分析旨在评估机器人与腹腔镜方法治疗直肠癌的有效性和安全性及术后死亡率并发症等。
Abstract: Surgery has always been the cornerstone of rectal cancer treatment, aiming to remove the tumor and preserve bowel function as much as possible. Laparoscopic surgery has increasingly entered the public eye, and robotic surgery is a minimally invasive alternative to traditional methods. However, conventional laparoscopic surgery faces limitations in terms of mobility and dexterity of instruments. On the other hand, robotic approaches enhance these aspects by providing surgeons with better accuracy, 3D HD view, and superior tissue manipulation capabilities, making it an increasingly popular option for rectal cancer treatment. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of robotic versus laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer, as well as postoperative mortality and complications.
文章引用:常浩. 机器人与腹腔镜治疗直肠癌:手术预后及手术并发症等的Meta分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(2): 1927-1932. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.152552

参考文献

[1] 姚宏伟, 李心翔, 崔龙, 等. 中国结直肠癌手术病例登记数据库2022年度报告: 一项全国性登记研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(1): 93-99.
[2] 姚宏伟, 李心翔, 崔龙, 等. 中国结直肠癌手术病例登记数据库2019年度报告: 一项全国性登记研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(1): 106-110+116.
[3] Heald, R.J. and Ryall, R.D.H. (1986) Recurrence and Survival after Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer. The Lancet, 327, 1479-1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Thyø, A., Emmertsen, K.J. and Laurberg, S. (2018) The Rectal Cancer Female Sexuality Score: Development and Validation of a Scoring System for Female Sexual Function after Rectal Cancer Surgery. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 61, 656-666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] de Lacy, F.B., Turrado-Rodriguez, V., Torroella, A., van Laarhoven, J., Otero-Piñeiro, A., Almenara, R., et al. (2021) Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life after Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 65, 46-54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Feng, Q., Yuan, W., Li, T., Tang, B., Jia, B., Zhou, Y., et al. (2022) Robotic versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer (REAL): Short-Term Outcomes of a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 7, 991-1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Tang, B., Lei, X., Ai, J., Huang, Z., Shi, J. and Li, T. (2021) Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 19, Article No. 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Tamba, H., Miura, T., Sakamoto, Y., et al. (2023) Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic Surgery in Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Lower Rectal Cancer [In Japanese]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 50, 212-214.
[9] Martins, R.S., Fatimi, A.S., Mahmud, O., Jahangir, A., Mahar, M.U., Aamir, S.R., et al. (2023) Multidimensional Quality of Life after Robotic versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Journal of Surgery, 47, 1310-1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Numata, M., Tamagawa, H., Kazama, K., Atsumi, Y., Iguchi, K., Sawazaki, S., et al. (2021) Potential Benefits of Minimally Invasive Laparoscopy in Reducing Local Recurrence after Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer. Anticancer Research, 41, 2617-2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Nasir, I., Mureb, A., Aliozo, C.C., Abunada, M.H. and Parvaiz, A. (2021) State of the Art in Robotic Rectal Surgery: Marginal Gains Worth the Pain? Updates in Surgery, 73, 1073-1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Kowalewski, K.F., Seifert, L., Ali, S., Schmidt, M.W., Seide, S., Haney, C., et al. (2020) Functional Outcomes after Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Rectal Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, 35, 81-95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Uk Bae, S. (2022) Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer—An English Version. Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon, 6, 221-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Corbellini, C., Biffi, R., Luca, F., Chiappa, A., Costa, S., Bertani, E., et al. (2016) Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Medium-Term Comparative Outcomes from a Multicenter Study. Tumori Journal, 102, 414-421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Jayne, D., Pigazzi, A., Marshall, H., Croft, J., Corrigan, N., Copeland, J., et al. (2017) Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 318, 1569-1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Law, W.L. and Foo, D.C.C. (2016) Comparison of Short-Term and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Resection for Mid and Distal Rectal Cancer. Surgical Endoscopy, 31, 2798-2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Debakey, Y., Zaghloul, A., Farag, A., Mahmoud, A. and Elattar, I. (2018) Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Approach for Rectal Cancer Surgery, First Egyptian Academic Center Experience, Rct. Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2018, 1-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Meyer, J., van der Schelling, G. and Crolla, R. (2023) Robotic versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 8, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Xiong, B., Ma, L., Huang, W., Zhao, Q., Cheng, Y. and Liu, J. (2015) Robotic versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Eight Studies. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 19, 516-526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Numata, M., Kazama, K., Onodera, A., Hara, K., Atsumi, Y., Okamoto, H., et al. (2020) Short-Term Outcomes Following Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Technically Demanding Rectal Cancer. Anticancer Research, 40, 2337-2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Katsuno, H., Hanai, T., Masumori, K., Koide, Y., Ashida, K., Matsuoka, H., et al. (2020) Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Operative Technique and Review of the Literature. Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon, 4, 14-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Pascual, M. (2016) Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Current Status and Implementation of the Latest Technological Innovations. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 22, 704-717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Trastulli, S., Desiderio, J., Lin, J., Reim, D., Zheng, C., Borghi, F., et al. (2021) Laparoscopic Compared with Open D2 Gastrectomy on Perioperative and Long-Term, Stage-Stratified Oncological Outcomes for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the IMIGASTRIC Database. Cancers, 13, Article 4526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Prete, F.P., Pezzolla, A., Prete, F., Testini, M., Marzaioli, R., Patriti, A., et al. (2018) Robotic versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer. Annals of Surgery, 267, 1034-1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Park, E.J., Cho, M.S., Baek, S.J., Hur, H., Min, B.S., Baik, S.H., et al. (2015) Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer. Annals of Surgery, 261, 129-137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Simillis, C., Lal, N., Thoukididou, S.N., Kontovounisios, C., Smith, J.J., Hompes, R., et al. (2019) Open versus Laparoscopic versus Robotic versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer. Annals of Surgery, 270, 59-68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Shigesi, N., Kvaskoff, M., Kirtley, S., Feng, Q., Fang, H., Knight, J.C., et al. (2019) The Association between Endometriosis and Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 25, 486-503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]