语言中的递归运算能力是人类独有的吗?——基于近二十年的文献回顾
Is the Ability of Recursively Computing in Language Unique to Humans?—Based on a Review of Literature Spanning Nearly Two Decades
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2025.132219, PDF,   
作者: 杨启航:苏州大学外国语学院,江苏 苏州
关键词: 语言递归运算合并Language Recursion Computation Merging
摘要: 为什么只有人类具有“语言”能力,而其它动物(即使是与我们最相近的黑猩猩)只具备简单的“交流”能力?这一问题困扰并驱使着语言学家、认知神经科学家等不同领域学者提出不同的假设和猜想,并在近二十年里力图通过实证方式验证其猜想,其中Hauser等人2002年提出的假设得到了最多的关注,他们认为人类语言区别于动物交流的本质在于是否能在语言系统中进行递归运算。本文总结近二十年理论、实证研究结果,首先定义什么是“语言”和什么是语言系统中的“递归”,并在此基础上回顾总结语言中的“递归运算”能力是否是人类独有的,并为后续的实证研究提供研究思路。
Abstract: Why do humans uniquely possess “language”, while other animals (even our closest relatives, chimpanzees) are limited to simple forms of “communication”? This question has puzzled and inspired scholars from various disciplines, including linguistics and cognitive neuroscience, to propose diverse hypotheses and conjectures. Over the past two decades, researchers have endeavored to test these ideas through empirical methods. Among these, the hypothesis put forward by Hauser et al. in 2002 has garnered the most attention. They argued that the essence of human language, distinguishing it from animal communication, lies in the capacity for recursively computing elements within the language system. This article synthesizes theoretical and empirical research findings from the past twenty years, first defining what is “language” and what is “recursion” in language systems, and then addressing whether the capacity for “recursion” in language is unique to humans. At last, I offer insights and directions for future empirical research.
文章引用:杨启航. 语言中的递归运算能力是人类独有的吗?——基于近二十年的文献回顾[J]. 现代语言学, 2025, 13(2): 735-745. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2025.132219

参考文献

[1] Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W.T. (2002) The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Hauser, M.D. and Watumull, J. (2017) The Universal Generative Faculty: The Source of Our Expressive Power in Language, Mathematics, Morality, and Music. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 43, 78-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Chomsky, N., Seely, T.D., Berwick, R.C., Fong, S., Huybregts, M.A.C., Kitahara, H., et al. (2023) Merge and the Strong Minimalist Thesis. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Friederici, A.D., Chomsky, N., Berwick, R.C., Moro, A. and Bolhuis, J.J. (2017) Language, Mind and Brain. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 713-722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Christiansen, H.M. and Chater, N. (2018) Creating Language: Integrating Evolution, Acquisition, and Processing. The MIT Press.
[6] Thompson, B., Roberts, S.G. and Lupyan, G. (2020) Cultural Influences on Word Meanings Revealed through Large-Scale Semantic Alignment. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 1029-1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Everett, D.L. (2005) Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology, 46, 621-646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Fedorenko, E., Piantadosi, S.T. and Gibson, E.A.F. (2024) Language Is Primarily a Tool for Communication Rather than Thought. Nature, 630, 575-586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Christiansen, M.H. and Chater, N. (2015) The Language Faculty That Wasn’t: A Usage-Based Account of Natural Language Recursion. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.
[11] 胡旭辉. 语言官能与外部世界的联结——基于生成语言学的语言模型初探[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2024, 56(3): 452-462, 481.
[12] Chomsky, N. (2005) Three Factors in Language Design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Yang, C., Crain, S., Berwick, R.C., Chomsky, N. and Bolhuis, J.J. (2017) The Growth of Language: Universal Grammar, Experience, and Principles of Computation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 103-119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Chomsky, N. (2023) Genuine Explanation and the Strong Minimalist Thesis. Cognitive Semantics, 8, 347-365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Mendívil-Giró, J. (2018) Is Universal Grammar Ready for Retirement? A Short Review of a Longstanding Misinterpretation. Journal of Linguistics, 54, 859-888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Berwick, R.C. and Chomsky, N. (2016) Why Only US. The MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., Rivest, R.L. and Stein, C. (2022) Introduction to Algorithms. MIT Press.
[18] Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures. Mouton de Gruyter.
[19] Pinker, S. and Jackendoff, R. (2005) The Faculty of Language: What’s Special about It? Cognition, 95, 201-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 杨彩梅, 董昕. 唯递归假说中“递归”的界定[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2022, 45(1): 1-10, 160.
[21] Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á.J. and Ott, D. (2019) Generative Grammar and the Faculty of Language: Insights, Questions, and Challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 229-261.
[22] Chomsky, N. (2007) Approaching VG from Below. In: Sauerland, U. and Gärtner, H.M., Eds., Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Mouton de Gruyter, 1-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Dékány, É. (2019) Foundations of Generative Linguistics. Acta Linguistica Academica, 66, 309-334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Chomsky, N. (2020) Minimalism: Where We Are Now, and Where We Are Going. Gengo Kenkyu, 160, 1-41.
[25] Roeper, T.W. (2011) The Acquisition of Recursion: How Formalism Articulates the Child’s Path. Biolinguistics, 5, 57-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Matthei, E.H. (1982) The Acquisition of Prenominal Modifier Sequences. Cognition, 11, 301-332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Pérez-Leroux, A.T., Peterson, T., Castilla-Earls, A., Béjar, S., Massam, D. and Roberge, Y. (2018) The Acquisition of Recursive Modification in NPs. Language, 94, 332-359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Hollebrandse, B. and Roeper, T. (2014) Empirical Results and Formal Approaches to Recursion in Acquisition. In: Roeper, T. and Speas, M., Eds., Recursion: Complexity in Cognition, Springer, 179-219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Fitch, W.T. (1997) Vocal Tract Length and Formant Frequency Dispersion Correlate with Body Size in Rhesus Macaques. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1213-1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Kuhl, P.K. and Padden, D.M. (1982) Enhanced Discriminability at the Phonetic Boundaries for the Voicing Feature in Macaques. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 542-550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Owren, M.J. and Bernacki, R.H. (1988) The Acoustic Features of Vervet Monkey Alarm Calls. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 1927-1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Rendall, D., Owren, M.J. and Rodman, P.S. (1998) The Role of Vocal Tract Filtering in Identity Cueing in Rhesus Monkey (Macaca mulatta) Vocalizations. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 602-614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Kawai, N. and Matsuzawa, T. (2000) Numerical Memory Span in a Chimpanzee. Nature, 403, 39-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Matsuzawa, T. (1985) Use of Numbers by a Chimpanzee. Nature, 315, 57-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Fitch, W.T. and Hauser, M.D. (2004) Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate. Science, 303, 377-380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Gentner, T.Q., Fenn, K.M., Margoliash, D. and Nusbaum, H.C. (2006) Recursive Syntactic Pattern Learning by Songbirds. Nature, 440, 1204-1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Abe, K. and Watanabe, D. (2011) Songbirds Possess the Spontaneous Ability to Discriminate Syntactic Rules. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1067-1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Corballis, M.C. (2007) Recursion, Language, and Starlings. Cognitive Science, 31, 697-704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Beckers, G.J.L., Bolhuis, J.J., Okanoya, K. and Berwick, R.C. (2012) Birdsong Neurolinguistics: Songbird Context-Free Grammar Claim Is Premature. NeuroReport, 23, 139-145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Ferrigno, S., Cheyette, S.J., Piantadosi, S.T. and Cantlon, J.F. (2020) Recursive Sequence Generation in Monkeys, Children, U.S. Adults, and Native Amazonians. Science Advances, 6, eaaz1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Liao, D.A., Brecht, K.F., Johnston, M. and Nieder, A. (2022) Recursive Sequence Generation in Crows. Science Advances, 8, eabq3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Suzuki, T.N. and Matsumoto, Y.K. (2022) Experimental Evidence for Core-Merge in the Vocal Communication System of a Wild Passerine. Nature Communications, 13, Article No. 5605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Hochmann, J., Azadpour, M. and Mehler, J. (2008) Do Humans Really Learn AnBn Artificial Grammars from Exemplars? Cognitive Science, 32, 1021-1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Eisenberg, S.L., Ukrainetz, T.A., Hsu, J.R., Kaderavek, J.N., Justice, L.M. and Gillam, R.B. (2008) Noun Phrase Elaboration in Children’s Spoken Stories. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 145-157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Hollebrandse, B., Hobbs, C., De Villiers, J. and Roeper, T. (2008) Second Order Embedding and Second Order False Belief. In: Becker, M. and Ud Deen, K., Eds., Language Acquisition and Development, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 268-278.
[46] Li, D., Yang, X., Roeper, T., Wilson, M., Yin, R., Kim, J., Merritt, E., Lopez, D. and Tero, A. (2020) Acquisition of recursion in Child Mandarin. Proceedings of the 44th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, 7-10 November 2019, 294-307.
[47] Limbach, M. and Adone, D. (2010) Language Acquisition of Recursive Possessives in English. In: Proceedings of the 34th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 34, pp. 281-290). Somerville, Cascadilla Press.
[48] Mcdaniel, D., Mckee, C. and Garrett, M.F. (2009) Children’s Sentence Planning: Syntactic Correlates of Fluency Variations. Journal of Child Language, 37, 59-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[49] Pérez-Leroux, A.T., Castilla-Earls, A.P., Bejar, S. and Massam, D. (2012) Elmo’s Sister’s Ball: The Problem of Acquiring Nominal Recursion. Language Acquisition, 19, 301-311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[50] Terunuma, A., Isobe, M., Nakajima, M., Okabe, R., Inada, S., Inokuma, S. and Nakato, T. (2017) Acquisition of Recursive Possessives and Locatives within DPs in Japanese. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, 4-6 November 2016, 626-636.
[51] Yang, C., Hu, Y., Fan, J., Dong, X. and Jeschull, L. (2022) An Experimental Study of Mandarin-Speaking Children’s Acquisition of Recursion under a Formal Definition/Classification System for Recursion. Lingua, 271, Article ID: 103228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[52] Huang, N. and Phillips, C. (2021) When Missing NPs Make Double Center-Embedding Sentences Acceptable. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 6, Article 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[53] Baldwin, K.B. and Kutas, M. (1997) An ERP Analysis of Implicit Structured Sequence Learning. Psychophysiology, 34, 74-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[54] Polich, J. (2011) Neuropsychology of P300. In: Kappenman, E.S. and Luck, S.J., Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components, Oxford University Press, 159-188.
[55] Friederici, A.D. (2002) Towards a Neural Basis of Auditory Sentence Processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78-84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[56] Friederici, A.D. and Chomsky, N. (2017) Language in Our Brain: The Origins of a Uniquely Human Capacity. The MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[57] Friederici, A.D., Pfeifer, E. and Hahne, A. (1993) Event-Related Brain Potentials during Natural Speech Processing: Effects of Semantic, Morphological and Syntactic Violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 183-192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[58] Neville, H., Nicol, J.L., Barss, A., Forster, K.I. and Garrett, M.F. (1991) Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 151-165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[59] Chomsky, N. and Miller, G.A. (1963) Introduction to the Formal Analysis of Natural Languages. In: Duncan Luce, R.R.B.R. and Galanter, E., Ed., Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, John Wiley and Sons, 269-321.
[60] Bahlmann, J., Schubotz, R.I., Mueller, J.L., Koester, D. and Friederici, A.D. (2009) Neural Circuits of Hierarchical Visuo-Spatial Sequence Processing. Brain Research, 1298, 161-170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[61] Blumenthal, A.L. (1966) Observations with Self-Embedded Sentences. Psychonomic Science, 6, 453-454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[62] Friederici, A.D. (2013) Is There a Brain Basis of Recursion? In: Lowenthal, F. and Lefebvre, L., Eds., Language and Recursion, Springer, 101-113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[63] Gibson, E. (1998) Linguistic Complexity: Locality of Syntactic Dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[64] Gibson, E., Tily, H. and Fedorenko, E. (2013) The Processing Complexity of English Relative Clauses. In: Sanz, M., Laka, I. and Tanenhaus, M.K., Eds., Language Down the Garden Path: The Cognitive and Biological Basis for Linguistic Structures, Oxford University Press, 149-173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[65] Kimball, J. (1973) Seven Principles of Surface Structure Parsing in Natural Language. Cognition, 2, 15-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[66] Miller, G.A. and Isard, S. (1964) Free Recall of Self-Embedded English Sentences. Information and Control, 7, 292-303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[67] Schlesinger, I.M. (1975) Why a Sentence in Which a Sentence in Which a Sentence Is Embedded Is Embedded Is Difficult. Linguistics, 13, 53-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[68] Frazier, L. (1985) Syntactic Complexity. In: Zwicky, A.M., Dowty, D.R. and Karttunen, L., Eds., Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, 129-189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[69] Gibson, E. and Thomas, J. (1999) Memory Limitations and Structural Forgetting: The Perception of Complex Ungrammatical Sentences as Grammatical. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 225-248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[70] Gimenes, M., Rigalleau, F. and Gaonac’h, D. (2009) When a Missing Verb Makes a French Sentence More Acceptable. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 440-449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[71] Frank, S.L., Trompenaars, T. and Vasishth, S. (2015) Cross‐Linguistic Differences in Processing Double‐Embedded Relative Clauses: Working‐Memory Constraints or Language Statistics? Cognitive Science, 40, 554-578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[72] Vasishth, S., Suckow, K., Lewis, R.L. and Kern, S. (2010) Short-Term Forgetting in Sentence Comprehension: Crosslinguistic Evidence from Verb-Final Structures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 533-567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[73] Phillips, C., Wagers, M.W. and Lau, E.F. (2011) 5: Grammatical Illusions and Selective Fallibility in Real-Time Language Comprehension. In: Runner, J., Ed., Experiments at the Interfaces, BRILL, 147-180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[74] Pylkkänen, L. (2019) The Neural Basis of Combinatory Syntax and Semantics. Science, 366, 62-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[75] Murphy, E. (2024) ROSE: A Neurocomputational Architecture for Syntax. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 70, Article ID: 101180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef