考虑级联失效与恢复策略的中欧班列网络恢复研究
Research on the Recovery of the China Railway Express Network Considering Cascading Failures and Recovery Strategies
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2025.142188, PDF,   
作者: 周文路:上海理工大学管理学院,上海
关键词: 级联失效中欧班列恢复性Cascading Failure China Railway Express Resilience
摘要: 本研究聚焦于中欧班列网络在级联失效情境下的恢复性,系统评估了不同恢复策略对网络恢复效果的影响。鉴于中欧班列网络规模庞大且节点与边的高度依赖性,其在外部冲击或内部故障时易发生级联失效,对网络稳定运行构成重大威胁。为此,本文基于中欧班列拓扑结构构建了恢复性模型,结合仿真分析,探讨了恢复时间步、恢复节点比例与失效节点扩展之间的交互作用。研究结果表明,不同恢复策略在应对特定突发事件时具有显著差异,合理的恢复时机与策略选择可显著提升网络的稳定性和恢复效率。本文为优化恢复策略、提升中欧班列网络在突发事件中的韧性提供了理论支持和实践指导。
Abstract: This study focuses on the resilience of the China Railway Express (CR Express) network under cascading failure scenarios, systematically evaluating the impact of different recovery strategies on network recovery performance. Given the large scale of the CR Express network and the high interdependence between nodes and edges, it is prone to cascading failures during external shocks or internal faults, posing a significant threat to the network's stable operation. To address this, a resilience model based on the CR Express topology was developed, and combined with simulation analysis, the interactions between recovery time steps, the proportion of recovered nodes, and the expansion of failed nodes were explored. The results show that different recovery strategies exhibit significant differences in responding to specific emergencies. Proper timing and strategy selection for recovery can significantly enhance the network’s stability and recovery efficiency. This study provides theoretical support and practical guidance for optimizing recovery strategies and improving the resilience of the CR Express network in the face of emergencies.
文章引用:周文路. 考虑级联失效与恢复策略的中欧班列网络恢复研究[J]. 建模与仿真, 2025, 14(2): 708-716. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2025.142188

参考文献

[1] 蒋雪莹, 王晓蕾, 朱道立. “一带一路”战略下的物流基础设施选址问题研究[J]. 上海管理科学, 2015, 37(5): 1-6.
[2] 秦欢欢, 秦胜, 郑平标. 基于货物价值的中欧班列目标货源分析[J]. 铁道货运, 2016(8): 13-19.
[3] 孙野. 基于复杂网络的中欧班列运输网络韧性分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2022.
[4] 张琪胜, 汤银英, 陈思. 考虑单一枢纽点失效的中欧班列轴辐网络研究[J]. 铁道经济研究, 2020(3): 24-28+33.
[5] 朱璋元, 王秋玲. 考虑级联失效与恢复接续性的复杂网络恢复动力学[J]. 计算物理, 2024, 41(2): 258-267.
[6] 朱蔓. 突发事件下的城市轨道交通网络韧性评估与提升[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2022.
[7] Ren, F., Zhao, T. and Wang, H. (2015) Risk and Resilience Analysis of Complex Network Systems Considering Cascading Failure and Recovery Strategy Based on Coupled Map Lattices. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, 1-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Strogatz, S.H. (2001) Exploring Complex Networks. Nature, 410, 268-276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Albert, R. and Barabási, A. (2002) Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 47-97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Kaneko, K. (1992) Overview of Coupled Map Lattices. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 2, 279-282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Wang, B., Su, Q. and Chin, K.S. (2021) Vulnerability Assessment of China-Europe Railway Express Multimodal Transport Network under Cascading Failures. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 584, Article 126359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Sun, L., Huang, Y., Chen, Y. and Yao, L. (2018) Vulnerability Assessment of Urban Rail Transit Based on Multi-Static Weighted Method in Beijing, China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 108, 12-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef