物流企业数字化转型如何影响其ESG表现
How Digital Transformation of Logistics Firms Affects Their ESG Performance
摘要: 如今ESG概念已经成为准确评估企业的环境绩效和衡量企业的可持续发展表现的科学方式,日益受到理论界与实践界的关注。物流企业的数字化转型会对其各个方面产生至关重要的影响,但目前数字化转型对于企业ESG表现的影响机理尚不清楚。因此,文章通过模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法,对2023年上市的物流相关企业进行了fsQCA分析,以探究数字化转型对物流企业ESG表现的影响,研究发现:(1) 任何时期单一要素并不足以构成物流企业高ESG表现产生的必要条件;(2) 存在战略突出型、多因组合型和单因主导型3种高ESG表现驱动模式;(3) 文章剖析了物流相关企业数字化完善ESG表现和推动可持续发展的可行路径,旨在明晰物流企业如何通过数字化转型来更好地实现其ESG绩效。
Abstract: Nowadays, the ESG concept has become a scientific way to accurately assess a company’s environmental performance and measure its sustainability performance, which has increasingly attracted attention from both the theoretical and practical communities. The digital transformation of logistics enterprises will have a crucial impact on all aspects of them, but the mechanism of the impact of digital transformation on the ESG performance of enterprises is still unclear. Therefore, the article conducted fsQCA analysis on logistics-related companies listed in 2023 through the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method to explore the impact of digital transformation on the ESG performance of logistics companies, and found that: (1) a single element at any period of time is not sufficient to constitute a necessary condition for the emergence of a logistics company’s high ESG performance; (2) there are three high ESG performance driver paths: strategic prominence, multi-causal combination and single-causal dominance; (3) the article analyzes the feasible paths for logistics-related enterprises to digitally improve ESG performance and promote sustainable development, aiming to clarify how logistics enterprises can better achieve their ESG performance through digital transformation.
文章引用:王诗璇, 孟庆峰, 李真, 张名瑀. 物流企业数字化转型如何影响其ESG表现[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(2): 1400-1409. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.142665

参考文献

[1] 黄丽华, 朱海林, 刘伟华, 等. 企业数字化转型和管理: 研究框架与展望[J]. 管理科学学报, 2021, 24(8): 26-35.
[2] 黄漫宇, 王孝行. 零售企业数字化转型对经营效率的影响研究——基于上市企业年报的文本挖掘分析[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 37(1): 38-49.
[3] 董璐燕, 朱烨丹. 数字化转型对零售企业经营绩效的影响——渠道集中度视角[J]. 商业经济研究, 2022(4): 26-29.
[4] 唐浩丹, 方森辉, 蒋殿春. 数字化转型的市场绩效: 数字并购能提升制造业企业市场势力吗? [J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, 39(12): 90-110.
[5] 吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 130-144+10.
[6] 黄节根, 吉祥熙, 李元旭. 数字化水平对企业创新绩效的影响研究——来自沪深A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 江西社会科学, 2021, 41(5): 61-72+254-255.
[7] 张文文, 景维民. 数字经济监管助力企业数字化转型——基于收益和成本的权衡分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024(1): 5-24.
[8] 谭劲松, 黄仁玉, 张京心. ESG表现与企业风险——基于资源获取视角的解释[J]. 管理科学, 2022, 35(5): 3-18.
[9] He, F., Ding, C., Yue, W. and Liu, G. (2023) ESG Performance and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87, Article ID: 102550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Lian, Y., Ye, T., Zhang, Y. and Zhang, L. (2023) How Does Corporate ESG Performance Affect Bond Credit Spreads: Empirical Evidence from China? International Review of Economics & Finance, 85, 352-371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 王晓红, 栾翔宇, 张少鹏. 企业研发投入、ESG表现与市场价值——企业数字化水平的调节效应[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(5): 896-904+915.
[12] 韩永辉, 黄亮雄, 王贤彬. 产业政策推动地方产业结构升级了吗?——基于发展型地方政府的理论解释与实证检验[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(8): 33-48.
[13] 张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用: 定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(9): 1312-1323.