腹腔镜肠粘连松解术对粘连性肠梗阻患者临床效果及并发症的影响分析
Analysis of Clinical Effect and Complications of Laparoscopic Intestinal Adhesiolysis in Patients with Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction
摘要: 目的:分析粘连性肠梗阻患者应用常规开腹手术、腹腔镜肠粘连松解术治疗的临床病理学特性及预后效果。方法:收集2020年6月至2022年6月期间于青岛大学附属医院急诊普外科接受手术治疗的154例粘连性肠梗阻患者的临床资料,分为腔镜组和开腹组,各77例。比较两组手术相关指标、并发症,并观察手术前后血清指标。结果:腔镜组与开腹组手术疗效差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);腔镜组切口直径、手术操作耗时、围术期失血量、术后初次离床时间、术后初次排气时间、总住院天数、视觉模拟法(visual analog scale, VAS)评分、并发症发生率均低于开腹组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);术后5 d,与开腹组相比腔镜组前白蛋白、IL-10升高,而降钙素原(PCT)、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)降低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:腹腔镜肠粘连松解术切口更小,术后炎症反应更轻,利于预后,具有耗时短、失血少、并发症少、疼痛轻、恢复迅速等优势。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the clinical pathology characteristics and prognosis of patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction treated with conventional open surgery and laparoscopic intestinal lysis. Methods: From June 2020 to June 2022, 154 consecutive patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction, who were treated in the Emergency General Surgery Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, were divided into two groups: laparoscopic group and Open Group, 77 cases each. The related indexes, complications and serum indexes before and after operation were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in surgical efficacy between the laparoscopic group and the open group (P > 0.05). The incision diameter, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time to first ambulation after surgery, time to first flatus after surgery, total hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and complication incidence rate were all lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (P < 0.05). On postoperative day 5, prealbumin and IL-10 levels were higher, while procalcitonin (PCT) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were lower in the laparoscopic group compared to the open group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: laparoscopic lysis of intestinal adhesion has the advantages of less incision, less inflammatory reaction, shorter time-consuming, less blood loss, fewer complications, less pain and rapid recovery.
文章引用:刘姗, 袁浩然, 彭新刚. 腹腔镜肠粘连松解术对粘连性肠梗阻患者临床效果及并发症的影响分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(3): 1179-1184. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.153726

参考文献

[1] 朱小林, 吕铁升. 腹腔镜肠粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的临床疗效及并发症观察[J]. 贵州医药, 2022, 46(7): 1093-1094.
[2] 缪琦, 杜华劲, 高学键, 等. 老年急性胆囊炎患者腹腔镜切除术后肠粘连发生的影响因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2022, 42(6): 1378-1381.
[3] 王建国, 韩锡琳, 朱振飞. 粘连性肠梗阻腹腔镜肠粘连松解术手术方法选择[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2022, 25(1): 52-53.
[4] 刘想德, 郑志杰, 苟尕虎. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的效果及对前白蛋白和降钙素原的影响[J]. 中国肛肠病杂志, 2022, 42(1): 8-10.
[5] Sabbagh, C., Mauvais, F., Tuech, J., Tresallet, C., Ortega-Debalon, P., Mathonnet, M., et al. (2022) Impact of a Procalcitonin-Based Algorithm on the Quality of Management of Patients with Uncomplicated Adhesion-Related Small Bowel Obstruction Assessed by a Textbook Outcome: A Multicenter Cluster-Randomized Open-Label Controlled Trial. BMC Gastroenterology, 22, Article No. 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 吴铁, 杨寅熙, 董晟, 等. 腹腔镜探查肠粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻临床效果及对胃肠功能恢复和并发症的影响[J]. 解放军医药杂志, 2021, 33(12): 76-78.
[7] 严广斌. 视觉模拟评分法[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(2): 273.
[8] 叶璁璁, 汪传文, 叶锋. 腹腔镜手术治疗顽固性粘连性肠梗阻的临床效果观察与预后研究[J]. 吉林医学, 2021, 42(3): 707-708.
[9] Quero, G., Covino, M., Laterza, V., Fiorillo, C., Rosa, F., Menghi, R., et al. (2021) Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction in Elderly Patients: A Single-Center Analysis of Treatment Strategies and Clinical Outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 56, 784-790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 吴险, 韦振轩, 林丽文. C反应蛋白、前白蛋白和降钙素原在粘连性肠梗阻患者腔镜术后或开放手术后的应用价值[J]. 微创医学, 2020, 15(5): 641-643.
[11] 陈启仪, 姜军. 小肠梗阻诊断与治疗再认识[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(10): 1136-1140.
[12] 王剑, 毛琦, 姚丹华, 等. 腹腔镜手术治疗慢性粘连性肠梗阻的可行性分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2016, 19(4): 422-426.
[13] 朱文劲, 徐飞鹏, 许庆文, 等. 腹腔镜肠粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的效果观察[J]. 中国实用医刊, 2019(11): 55-57.
[14] 魏宝中, 朱红侠. 腹腔镜肠粘连松解术对粘连性肠梗阻患者胃肠功能及血清PCT、PA水平的影响[J]. 北华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 24(3): 351-355.
[15] 王新文. 腹腔镜肠粘连松解术治疗术后粘连性肠梗阻临床研究[J]. 河南外科学杂志, 2023, 29(6): 101-103.