基于常规MRI VASARI特征的脑胶质瘤Ki-67表达水平预测模型的建立与验证
Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Ki-67 Expression Level in Gliomas Based on Conventional MRI VASARI Features
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.153770, PDF,   
作者: 张 跃, 刘学军*:青岛大学附属医院放射科,山东 青岛;宋双双:青岛大学附属医院PET中心,山东 青岛
关键词: 磁共振成像胶质瘤Ki-67列线图Magnetic Resonance Imaging Glioma Ki-67 Nomogram
摘要: 目的:本研究旨在基于常规MRI VASARI特征构建并验证脑胶质瘤Ki-67表达水平的预测模型。方法:本回顾性研究共纳入241例脑胶质瘤患者,按照7:3的比例随机分为训练集(n = 168)和验证集(n = 73)。收集参与者的临床资料及术前MRI影像,提取相关VASARI影像学特征。通过单因素分析和多因素逐步回归分析筛选候选变量,建立Ki-67表达水平的Logistic回归预测模型。模型预测效能根据受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线下面积(area under curve, AUC)评估。采用Hosmer-Lemesshow检验模型拟合优度,并绘制校准曲线及决策曲线。结果:单因素与多因素回归分析结果显示,强化程度、肿瘤跨中线和弥散受限是Ki-67表达水平的独立预测因素。基于上述3项特征构建的预测模型在训练集和验证集中的AUC分别为0.886和0.848,Hosmer-Lemeshow检验表明模型拟合良好(训练集χ2 = 3.727,p = 0.444,验证集χ2 = 5.901,p= 0.207)。校准曲线显示模型的校准度较好,决策曲线分析表明模型具有较高的净收益。结论:基于常规MRI VASARI特征,我们成功构建了可有效预测脑胶质瘤Ki-67表达水平的回归模型,或可为脑胶质瘤的个体化治疗决策提供参考。
Abstract: Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model for Ki-67 expression levels in gliomas based on conventional MRI VASARI features. Methods: A total of 241 glioma patients were retrospectively included and randomly divided into a training set (n = 168) and a validation set (n = 73) at a ratio of 7:3. Clinical data and preoperative MRI images were collected, and relevant VASARI imaging features were extracted. Candidate variables were selected using univariate analysis and multivariate stepwise regression analysis to construct a Logistic regression model for predicting Ki-67 expression levels. The model’s predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to assess model goodness-of-fit, and calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed. Results: Univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified enhancement degree, midline crossing, and diffusion restriction as independent predictors of Ki-67 expression levels. The predictive model incorporating these three features achieved AUCs of 0.886 in the training set and 0.848 in the validation set. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated a good model fit (training set: χ2 = 3.727, p = 0.444; validation set: χ2 = 5.901, p = 0.207). The calibration curve demonstrated good agreement between predicted and actual values, while decision curve analysis indicated a high net benefit. Conclusion: We successfully developed a regression model based on conventional MRI VASARI features to effectively predict Ki-67 expression levels in gliomas. This model may serve as a valuable tool for individualized treatment decision-making in glioma management.
文章引用:张跃, 宋双双, 刘学军. 基于常规MRI VASARI特征的脑胶质瘤Ki-67表达水平预测模型的建立与验证[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(3): 1507-1517. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.153770

参考文献

[1] Schwartzbaum, J.A., Fisher, J.L., Aldape, K.D. and Wrensch, M. (2006) Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Glioma. Nature Clinical Practice Neurology, 2, 494-503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Ostrom, Q.T., Cioffi, G., Waite, K., Kruchko, C. and Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S. (2021) CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2014-2018. Neuro-Oncology, 23, iii1-iii105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Ostrom, Q.T., Patil, N., Cioffi, G., Waite, K., Kruchko, C. and Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S. (2020) CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2013-2017. Neuro-Oncology, 22, iv1-iv96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Miller, K.D., Ostrom, Q.T., Kruchko, C., Patil, N., Tihan, T., Cioffi, G., et al. (2021) Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumor Statistics, 2021. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 381-406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Louis, D.N., Perry, A., Wesseling, P., Brat, D.J., Cree, I.A., Figarella-Branger, D., et al. (2021) The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Summary. Neuro-Oncology, 23, 1231-1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Sobecki, M., Mrouj, K., Colinge, J., Gerbe, F., Jay, P., Krasinska, L., et al. (2017) Cell-Cycle Regulation Accounts for Variability in Ki-67 Expression Levels. Cancer Research, 77, 2722-2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Xing, Z., Huang, W., Su, Y., Yang, X., Zhou, X. and Cao, D. (2022) Non-Invasive Prediction of P53 and Ki-67 Labelling Indices and O-6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Promoter Methylation Status in Adult Patients with Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wild-Type Glioblastomas Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion-Weighted Imaging Combined with Conventional MRI. Clinical Radiology, 77, e576-e584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Qiu, J., Deng, K., Wang, P., Chen, C., Luo, Y., Yuan, S., et al. (2022) Application of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging to the Study of Edema in Solid and Peritumoral Areas of Glioma. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 86, 10-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Fudaba, H., Shimomura, T., Abe, T., Matsuta, H., Momii, Y., Sugita, K., et al. (2014) Comparison of Multiple Parameters Obtained on 3T Pulsed Arterial Spin-labeling, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, and MRS and the Ki-67 Labeling Index in Evaluating Glioma Grading. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 35, 2091-2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Li, J., Liu, S., Qin, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, N. and Liu, H. (2020) High-Order Radiomics Features Based on T2 FLAIR MRI Predict Multiple Glioma Immunohistochemical Features: A More Precise and Personalized Gliomas Management. PLOS ONE, 15, e0227703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Li, Y., Qian, Z., Xu, K., Wang, K., Fan, X., Li, S., et al. (2017) Radiomic Features Predict Ki-67 Expression Level and Survival in Lower Grade Gliomas. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 135, 317-324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Sun, X., Pang, P., Lou, L., Feng, Q., Ding, Z. and Zhou, J. (2020) Radiomic Prediction Models for the Level of Ki-67 and P53 in Glioma. Journal of International Medical Research, 48, Article 300060520914466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Gutman, D.A., Cooper, L.A.D., Hwang, S.N., Holder, C.A., Gao, J., Aurora, T.D., et al. (2013) MR Imaging Predictors of Molecular Profile and Survival: Multi-Institutional Study of the TCGA Glioblastoma Data Set. Radiology, 267, 560-569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Cai, J., Zhang, C., Zhang, W., Wang, G., Yao, K., Wang, Z., et al. (2016) ATRX, IDH1-R132H and Ki-67 Immunohistochemistry as a Classification Scheme for Astrocytic Tumors. Oncoscience, 3, 258-265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 周小焙. 磁共振影像组学、常规特征与DWI量化特征对脑胶质瘤分级诊断的初步研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 衡阳: 南华大学, 2021.
[16] 林坤, 王晓明. Nomogram在脑胶质瘤MR术前病理分级中的应用[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2023, 31(5): 442-447.
[17] Bai, Y., Lin, Y., Zhang, W., Kong, L., Wang, L., Zuo, P., et al. (2016) Noninvasive Amide Proton Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluating the Grading and Cellularity of Gliomas. Oncotarget, 8, 5834-5842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Arshad, H., Ahmad, Z. and Hasan, S.H. (2010) Gliomas: Correlation of Histologic Grade, Ki-67 and p53 Expression with Patient Survival. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 11, 1637-1640.
[19] Gevaert, O., Mitchell, L.A., Achrol, A.S., Xu, J., Echegaray, S., Steinberg, G.K., et al. (2014) Glioblastoma Multiforme: Exploratory Radiogenomic Analysis by Using Quantitative Image Features. Radiology, 273, 168-174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 张惠柯, 陈传亮, 史大鹏, 薛丹丹. MRI伦勃朗视觉感受图像特征对脑胶质瘤分级的预测价值[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2019, 33(9): 907-910.
[21] Pierallini, A., Bonamini, M., Bozzao, A., Pantano, P., Stefano, D.D., Ferone, E., et al. (1997) Supratentorial Diffuse Astrocytic Tumours: Proposal of an MRI Classification. European Radiology, 7, 395-399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] 钱丽霞, 刘起旺, 梁力, 张锁旺, 孙少杰. 幕上星形细胞肿瘤MRI表现与VEGF、P16、Ki-67相关性研究[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2003, 9(6): 388-392.
[23] Gates, E.D.H., Lin, J.S., Weinberg, J.S., Hamilton, J., Prabhu, S.S., Hazle, J.D., et al. (2019) Guiding the First Biopsy in Glioma Patients Using Estimated Ki-67 Maps Derived from MRI: Conventional versus Advanced Imaging. Neuro-Oncology, 21, 527-536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Asari, S., Makabe, T., Katayama, S., Itoh, T., Tsuchida, S. and Ohmoto, T. (1994) Assessment of the Pathological Grade of Astrocytic Gliomas Using an MRI Score. Neuroradiology, 36, 308-310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Kolakshyapati, M., Adhikari, R.B., Karlowee, V., Takayasu, T., Nosaka, R., Amatya, V.J., et al. (2018) Nonenhancing Peritumoral Hyperintense Lesion on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Glioblastoma: A Novel Diagnostic and Specific Prognostic Indicator. Journal of Neurosurgery, 128, 667-678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Hu, X., Xue, M., Sun, S., Zou, Y., Li, J., Wang, X., et al. (2021) Combined Application of MRS and DWI Can Effectively Predict Cell Proliferation and Assess the Grade of Glioma: A Prospective Study. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 83, 56-63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Calvar, J.A., Meli, F.J., Romero, C., Yánez, M.L.C.P., Martinez, A.R., Lambre, H., et al. (2005) Characterization of Brain Tumors by MRS, DWI and Ki-67 Labeling Index. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 72, 273-280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] 徐彤彤, 王贝茹, 赵海珊, 胡春峰, 马红. 磁共振DWI评估脑胶质瘤预后及其与肿瘤细胞Ki-67表达及IDH1基因型的相关性[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2023, 21(10): 5-7.