环境行政公益诉讼中“不依法履职”的标准认定
Standard Determination of “Failure to Perform Duties in Accordance with the Law” in Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation
摘要: 环境行政机关与环境破坏问题有着直接的联系。而环境利益受到损害时,可能引起检察机关对环境行政机关提起诉讼,至于行政机关应不应该负责,关键判断其是否履行了职责。在司法实践中,因法律规定与现实情况之间的差异,导致“不依法履行职责”的认定标准不统一,法律职责的认识存在分歧。因此,笔者建议应当树立权责统一,科学合理地履行期限,同时确立好复合模式,即“行为标准”和“结果标准”相结合的模式来明确行政机关职责的履行,从而更好地发挥环境行政公益诉讼对保护环境的重要作用。
Abstract: There is a direct connection between environmental administrative agencies and environmental destruction issues. When environmental interests are harmed, it may lead to the procuratorial organs filing lawsuits against the environmental administrative organs. As for whether the administrative organs should be responsible, the key is to judge whether they have fulfilled their duties. In judicial practice, due to the difference between legal provisions and actual situations, the criteria for determining “failure to perform duties in accordance with the law” are not unified, and there are differences in the understanding of legal responsibilities. Therefore, the author suggests that a unified system of rights and responsibilities should be established, with a scientifically reasonable deadline for performance. At the same time, a composite model should be established, which combines “behavioral standards” and “outcome standards” to clarify the responsibilities of administrative agencies, in order to better play the important role of environmental administrative public interest litigation in protecting the environment.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
肖康康. 论环境行政公益诉讼中“不依法履行职责”的认定标准[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西北政法大学, 2021.
|
|
[2]
|
徐全兵. 检察机关提起行政公益诉讼的职能定位与制度构[J]. 行政法学研究, 2017(5): 77-86.
|
|
[3]
|
胡卫列, 迟晓燕. 从试点情况看行政公益诉讼诉前程序[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2017, 25(2): 30-48.
|
|
[4]
|
陈籽伶. 环境行政公益诉讼中行政机关履行法定职责的标准研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南财经大学, 2022.
|
|
[5]
|
魏新兴, 王园园. 环境行政公益诉讼中“不依法履行法定职责”的判断标准[J]. 周口师范学院学报, 2021(3): 121-126.
|