基于GONE理论对我国科创板上市企业财务舞弊事件的舞弊动因分析——以A企业为例
Analysis of Fraud Motivations Based on GONE Theory for Financial Fraud Incidents among Companies Listed on China’s Sci-Tech Innovation Board—Taking A Enterprise as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/orf.2025.152068, PDF,   
作者: 齐美萍, 江笑云*:上海理工大学管理学院,上海
关键词: 高新技术企业财务舞弊GONE理论High Tech Enterprises Financial Fraud GONE Theory
摘要: 我国高新技术企业相关认定的重新修订给其成长提供了极大的政治支持,高新技术产业从2016年开始持续保持高速增长。但与此同时,一些问题也逐渐显露出来。本文基于GONE理论,以A企业为例,对我国科创板上市企业财务舞弊事件进行了深入分析。A企业通过虚增营业收入、隐瞒关联方交易、虚增在建工程等手段,长期进行财务造假,最终被监管部门查处并终止上市。文章从GONE理论的四个维度——贪婪、机会、需求和暴露出发,探讨了A企业财务舞弊的动因。研究发现,高管受到股权激励的诱惑、股权结构失衡、内部控制失效、资金需求压力以及信息不对称等因素共同导致了舞弊行为的发生。此外,审计机构独立性不足、处罚力度较轻以及监管制度不完善也为舞弊提供了可乘之机。最后,文章从四个影响因子方面给出防舞弊建议,为高新企业敲响警钟、提供借鉴。
Abstract: The revision of the relevant recognition of high tech enterprises in our country has provided great political support for their growth, and the high tech enterprises have maintained high-speed growth since 2016. But at the same time, some problems are gradually emerging. This article is based on the GONE theory and takes Company A as an example to conduct an in-depth analysis of financial fraud incidents in Chinese companies listed on the Science and Technology Innovation Board. A company engaged in long-term financial fraud by inflating operating income, concealing related party transactions, and inflating construction in progress, and was ultimately investigated and terminated from listing by regulatory authorities. The article explores the causes of financial fraud in Company A from the four dimensions of GONE theory: greed, opportunity, demand, and exposure. Research has found that the temptation of equity incentives, imbalanced equity structures, ineffective internal controls, financial pressure, and information asymmetry among executives collectively contribute to the occurrence of fraudulent behavior. In addition, the lack of independence of audit institutions, light penalties, and imperfect regulatory systems also provide opportunities for fraud. Finally, the article provides anti fraud suggestions from four influencing factors, sounding the alarm and providing references for high-tech enterprises.
文章引用:齐美萍, 江笑云. 基于GONE理论对我国科创板上市企业财务舞弊事件的舞弊动因分析——以A企业为例[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2025, 15(2): 111-120. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2025.152068

参考文献

[1] 张稼俊, 李雨聪. 全面注册制下上市公司财务舞弊的动因及治理研究——以紫晶存储为例[J]. 中国产经, 2024(12): 68-70.
[2] 李君清. 上市公司内控失效案例研究——以泽达易盛为例[J]. 中国市场, 2023(30): 89-92.
[3] 陈金勇, 汪小池, 刘俊. ST柏龙财务舞弊识别与反舞弊框架的构建研究——整合麦克莱兰成就需求理论与GONE理论的视角[J]. 财会通讯, 2023(16): 89-97+117.
[4] 刘智慧. 基于GONE理论的新三板企业财务舞弊动因分析及防范对策——以蓝山科技为例[J]. 广西经济, 2023, 41(6): 24-29.
[5] 郭皓鑫, 吴慧敏. 基于舞弊风险因子理论浅析A公司财务造假案[J]. 会计师, 2020(4): 9-10.
[6] 胡卓航. 泽达易盛财务舞弊问题分析及研究对策[J]. 现代商业, 2024(16): 189-192.
[7] 梁永强. 基于舞弊风险因子理论的金正大财务舞弊分析[J]. 国际商务财会, 2024(18): 70-74+79.
[8] 陈关亭. 我国上市公司财务报告舞弊因素的实证分析[J]. 审计研究, 2007(5): 91-96+90.
[9] 马嘉彤. 上市公司财务舞弊手段及防范研究[J]. 中国价格监管与反垄断, 2024(9): 114-116.
[10] 李兰, 韩玮. SL股份财务造假动因及手段分析[J]. 江苏商论, 2024(2): 88-93.