不同呼吸状态下18F-FDG PET/CT贝叶斯正则化似然算法对肺结节半定量参数的影响
The Impact of the Bayesian Regularization Likelihood Algorithm on the Semi-Quantitative Parameters of Pulmonary Nodules in 18F-FDG PET/CT under Different Respiratory States
摘要: 目的:探讨贝叶斯正则化似然(BPL)重建算法在不同呼吸状态下对18F-FDG PET/CT肺结节半定量参数的影响。方法:回顾性分析2022年6月至2022年10月间于青岛大学附属医院行18F-FDG PET/CT全身扫描的108例患者,共计139个肺结节。采用自由呼吸OSEM、自由呼吸BPL、屏气OSEM和屏气BPL重建算法对肺结节PET图像进行重建,比较组间最大标准摄取值(SUVmax)、平均标准摄取值(SUVmean)、峰值标准摄取值(SUVpeak)、信号/本底比值(SBR)等半定量参数。组间差异采用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较分析。结果:屏气OSEM组重建后摄取代谢参数SUVmax、SUVmean、SUVpeak和SBR高于自由呼吸OSEM组,分别是4.65 (2.38, 7.47)和3.02 (1.67, 5.61) (z = −9.53, p < 0.001)、2.71 (1.85, 3.56)和2.25 (1.36, 3.12) (z = −8.67, p < 0.001)、2.65 (1.38, 5.52)和2.05 (1.29, 4.01)(z = −7.75, p < 0.001)、3.02 (1.45, 5.32)和1.77 (1.01, 3.50) (z = −9.74, p < 0.001)。屏气BPL组重建后摄取代谢参数SUVmax、SUVmean、SUVpeak和SBR高于自由呼吸BPL组,分别是6.8 (3.51, 11.55)和4.45 (2.19, 7.31) (z = −9.99, p < 0.001)、3.42 (2.52, 4.91)和2.71 (1.68, 3.55) (z = −9.30, p < 0.001)、3.70 (2.07, 6.61)和2.69 (1.72, 5.27) (z = −9.30, p < 0.001)、4.44 (2.24, 7.61)和2.59 (1.28, 4.66) (z = −10.07, p < 0.001)。屏气和自由呼吸状态下的BPL组重建后摄取代谢参数SUVmax、SUVmean、SUVpeak和SBR高于OSEM组,均p < 0.001。屏气BPL组对代谢参数(SUVmax、SUVmean、SUVpeak和SBR)及其变化率(%ΔSUVmax、%ΔSUVmean、%ΔSUVpeak和%ΔSBR)的影响显著大于自由呼吸BPL组(p < 0.001)。结论:屏气BPL重建算法通过减少呼吸运动伪影,显著提升了肺结节PET图像的半定量参数值检出率,为肺结节的良恶性诊断提供了更精确的影像学依据。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the impact of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm on the semi-quantitative parameters of lung nodules in 18F-FDG PET/CT under different respiratory states. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 108 patients with a total of 139 lung nodules who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT whole-body scans at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from June 2022 to October 2022. PET images of lung nodules were reconstructed using four algorithms: free-breathing OSEM, free-breathing BPL, breath-hold OSEM, and breath-hold BPL. The semi-quantitative parameters, including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak), and signal-to-background ratio (SBR), were compared among the groups. Intergroup differences were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: The SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, and SBR values in the breath-hold OSEM group were higher than those in the free-breathing OSEM group, with values of 4.65 (2.38, 7.47) vs. 3.02 (1.67, 5.61) (z = −9.53, p < 0.001), 2.71 (1.85, 3.56) vs. 2.25 (1.36, 3.12) (z = −8.67, p < 0.001), 2.65 (1.38, 5.52) vs. 2.05 (1.29, 4.01) (z = −7.75, p < 0.001), and 3.02 (1.45, 5.32) vs. 1.77 (1.01, 3.50) (z = −9.74, p < 0.001), respectively. The SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, and SBR values in the breath-hold BPL group were higher than those in the free-breathing BPL group, with values of 6.8 (3.51, 11.55) vs. 4.45 (2.19, 7.31) (z = −9.99, p < 0.001), 3.42 (2.52, 4.91) vs. 2.71 (1.68, 3.55) (z = −9.30, p < 0.001), 3.70 (2.07, 6.61) vs. 2.69 (1.72, 5.27) (z = −9.30, p < 0.001), and 4.44 (2.24, 7.61) vs. 2.59 (1.28, 4.66) (z = −10.07, p < 0.001), respectively. The SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, and SBR values in the BPL groups were higher than those in the OSEM groups under both breath-hold and free-breathing conditions (all p < 0.001). The breath-hold BPL group had a significantly greater impact on the metabolic parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, and SBR) and their changes (%ΔSUVmax, %ΔSUVmean, %ΔSUVpeak, and %ΔSBR) compared to the free-breathing BPL group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The breath-hold BPL reconstruction algorithm reduces respiratory motion artifacts, significantly enhancing the detection rate of semi-quantitative parameters in PET images of pulmonary nodules, thereby providing a more precise imaging basis for the diagnosis of their benign or malignant nature.
文章引用:薛伟, 杨光杰, 刘万亮, 李奔, 焦孟章, 王振光. 不同呼吸状态下18F-FDG PET/CT贝叶斯正则化似然算法对肺结节半定量参数的影响[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(4): 476-482. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.154956

参考文献

[1] El-Hussein, A., Manoto, S.L., Ombinda-Lemboumba, S., Alrowaili, Z.A. and Mthunzi-Kufa, P. (2020) A Review of Chemotherapy and Photodynamic Therapy for Lung Cancer Treatment. Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, 21, 149-161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会, 中国肺癌防治联盟专家组. 肺结节诊治中国专家共识(2024年版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2024, 47(8): 716-729.
[3] Lopci, E., Kobe, C., Gnanasegaran, G., Adam, J.A. and de Geus-Oei, L. (2021) “PET/CT Variants and Pitfalls in Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma”. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 51, 458-473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Matti, A., Lima, G.M., Pettinato, C., Pietrobon, F., Martinelli, F. and Fanti, S. (2019) How Do the More Recent Reconstruction Algorithms Affect the Interpretation Criteria of PET/CT Images? Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 53, 216-222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Lin, L.J., Wang, Y.T., et al. (2021) Impact of Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Algorithm on the Metabolism Parameters and Image Quality in 18F-FDG PET/CT Background Tissues. Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 6, 155-160.
[6] 黄克敏, 冯彦林, 梁伟棠, 等. 飞行时间和点扩散函数对PET/CT图像质量和标准摄取值影响的模型研究[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2021, 41(7): 420-424.
[7] Kamikawa, Y., Yoshida, Y. and Kawahara, Y. (2023) Effects of Point Spread Function Correction and Time-of-Flight on Visual Contrast Level and Pixel Values in Brain PET Images. Nuclear Medicine Communications, 44, 442-456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Leung, E.K., Abdelhafez, Y.G., Berg, E., Xie, Z., Zhang, X., Bayerlein, R., et al. (2022) Relating 18F-FDG Image Signal-to-Noise Ratio to Time-of-Flight Noise-Equivalent Count Rate in Total-Body PET Using the Uexplorer Scanner. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 67, Article 125007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 崔碧霄, 卢洁, 王曼, 等. TOF-PET图像重建技术评价小肿瘤病灶的临床价值[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2016, 26(7): 1237-1239.
[10] 庄静文, 谢峰, 吴天棋, 等. 不同重建条件对一体化PET-MR图像空间分辨率影响的研究[J]. 中国医学装备, 2017, 14(11): 12-15.
[11] 王旭, 许莎莎, 王卓, 等. 18F-FDG PET/CT贝叶斯正则化似然重建算法对肿瘤定量参数的影响[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2021, 37(11): 1720-1724.
[12] Teoh, E.J., McGowan, D.R., Bradley, K.M., Belcher, E., Black, E. and Gleeson, F.V. (2015) Novel Penalised Likelihood Reconstruction of PET in the Assessment of Histologically Verified Small Pulmonary Nodules. European Radiology, 26, 576-584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Teoh, E.J., McGowan, D.R., Bradley, K.M., Belcher, E., Black, E., Moore, A., et al. (2016) 18F-FDG PET/CT Assessment of Histopathologically Confirmed Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using a Penalised Likelihood Reconstruction. European Radiology, 26, 4098-4106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 高美佳, 刘瑶, 周洁, 等. 正则化重建算法对恶性肿瘤病灶18F-FDG PET/CT半定量参数的影响及其影响因素分析[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2023, 7(13): 84-86.
[15] 戴东, 刘建井, 卢笛, 等. Flex技术提高肺结节PET/CT图像质量和定量准确性的临床研究[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2024, 44(2): 98-103.
[16] Guerra, L., Ponti, E.D., Morzenti, S., Spadavecchia, C. and Crivellaro, C. (2017) Respiratory Motion Management in PET/CT: Applications and Clinical Usefulness. Current Radiopharmaceuticals, 10, 85-92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Robin, P., Bourhis, D., et al. (2018) Feasibility of Systematic Respiratory-Gated Acquisition in Unselected Patients Referred for 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29516001/
[18] Yip, S., McCall, K., Aristophanous, M., Chen, A.B., Aerts, H.J.W.L. and Berbeco, R. (2014) Comparison of Texture Features Derived from Static and Respiratory-Gated PET Images in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. PLOS ONE, 9, e115510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]