基于削峰填谷和用户收益的电动汽车充放电电价优化模型
Optimization Model for Electric Vehicle Charging and Discharging Electricity Prices Based on Load Leveling and User Benefits
DOI: 10.12677/orf.2025.152099, PDF,   
作者: 邹 畅, 黄宣哲:上海理工大学管理学院,上海;李军祥*:上海理工大学管理学院,上海;上海理工大学智慧应急管理学院,上海
关键词: 削峰填谷充放电价蒙特卡洛模拟价格弹性Load Leveling Charging and Discharging Electricity Prices Monte Carlo Simulation Price Elasticity
摘要: 为解决电动汽车在无引导机制下入网导致的负荷随机性变化问题,凸显电动汽车与电网互动技术(vehicle-to-grid, V2G)的实际价值,以削峰填谷和用户收益为目的,建立了电动汽车充放电电价优化模型。充放电电价作为首要因素,是引导用户参与V2G的关键。由于缺乏价格引导机制,用户难以规律性地参与V2G,随机性较强,严重威胁系统安全和电网的稳定运行。所以,合理的充放电电价策略不仅有利于系统负荷削峰填谷,减少充电系统电网压力,同时降低用户经济成本,使得用户侧和电网侧达到双赢的结果。首先,通过分析电动汽车参数差异以及用户出行习惯,使用蒙特卡洛法建立电动汽车充放电功率模型,提出电动汽车在无序模式下规模化接入电网不利于系统运行;接着,引入价格弹性因子,计算出实施峰谷电价前后的充放电电量。仿真结果表明,所设计的电动汽车峰谷分时充放电电价优化策略不仅显著降低了系统负荷的峰谷差率,实现削峰填谷,同时通过合理分配用户充放电行为的收益与成本,有效保障了用户侧的经济效益。
Abstract: To address the issue of random load fluctuations caused by electric vehicles (EVs) connecting to the grid without a guiding mechanism, and to highlight the practical value of vehicle-to-grid (V2G) interaction technology, an optimized electricity pricing model for EV charging and discharging was established with the goals of load leveling and maximizing user benefits. The charging and discharging electricity price is the primary factor guiding user participation in V2G. Due to the lack of a price guidance mechanism, user participation in V2G tends to be irregular and highly random, posing significant threats to system security and grid stability. Therefore, a reasonable electricity pricing strategy for charging and discharging not only facilitates load leveling, reducing grid pressure, but also lowers the economic costs for users, achieving a win-win outcome for both the user side and the grid side. Firstly, by analyzing the differences in EV parameters and user travel habits, a charging and discharging power model for EVs is established using the Monte Carlo method. It is proposed that the large-scale integration of EVs into the grid in an uncoordinated manner is detrimental to system operation. Subsequently, a price elasticity factor is introduced to calculate the charging and discharging of electricity before and after the implementation of time-of-use (TOU) pricing. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed TOU pricing optimization strategy for EV charging and discharging significantly reduces the peak-to-valley load difference, achieving effective load leveling. Additionally, by reasonably allocating the benefits and costs of user charging and discharging behaviors, the strategy effectively ensures economic benefits for the user side.
文章引用:邹畅, 李军祥, 黄宣哲. 基于削峰填谷和用户收益的电动汽车充放电电价优化模型[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2025, 15(2): 480-493. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2025.152099

参考文献

[1] 孙波, 王振兴, 孙佳佳. 电动汽车峰谷分时充放电价同步优化模型研究[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2017, 33(2): 130-136.
[2] 白浩, 曲锴, 訚山. 基于V2G技术的电动汽车与光伏协同调度优化策略[J]. 南方电网技术, 2019, 13(4): 88-92+106.
[3] 薛静云, 张银环. 基于用户行为的V2G模式下电动汽车有序充放电控制策略研究[J]. 智能城市, 2024, 10(2): 54-56.
[4] Pang, X., Jia, W., Li, H., Gao, Q. and Liu, W. (2024) A Bi-Objective Optimal Scheduling Method for the Charging and Discharging of EVs Considering the Uncertainty of Wind and Photovoltaic Output in the Context of Time-of-Use Electricity Price. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15, Article 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Hadian, E., Akbari, H., Farzinfar, M. and Saeed, S. (2020) Optimal Allocation of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations with Adopted Smart Charging/Discharging Schedule. IEEE Access, 8, 196908-196919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 刘晋源, 吕林, 高红均, 等. 计及分布式电源和电动汽车特性的主动配电网规划[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44(12): 41-48.
[7] 喻磊, 王锐, 程杉, 等. 基于多主体主从博弈的电动汽车充电站双层定价策略[J/OL]. 电力科学与技术学报, 2025: 1-13.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/43.1475.tm.20241121.0910.002.html, 2024-11-21.
[8] Sachan, S., Deb, S. and Singh, S.N. (2020) Different Charging Infrastructures along with Smart Charging Strategies for Electric Vehicles. Sustainable Cities and Society, 60, Article 102238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 赵雪琦, 高岩. 考虑多能供电差异的智能电网实时定价[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2024, 46(4): 431-439.
[10] Pan, X., Wang, L., Qiu, Q., Qiu, F. and Zhang, G. (2022) Many-Objective Optimization for Large-Scale EVs Charging and Discharging Schedules Considering Travel Convenience. International Journal of Speech Technology, 52, 2599-2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Jian, L.N., Zheng, Y.C. and Shao, Z.Y. (2017) High Efficient Valley-Filling Strategy for Centralized Coordinated Charging of Large-Scale Electric Vehicles. Applied Energy, 186, 46-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Wang, Y., et al. (2021) A User Classification-Based Charging Behavior Model for Electric Vehicles in Urban Areas. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3, 2345-2356.
[13] Li, X., et al. (2022) Impact of Charging Station Layout on User Behavior and Grid Load: A Case Study in Beijing. Applied Energy, 285, Article 116432.
[14] Zhang, Y., et al. (2020) Income-Driven Elasticity of Electricity Demand in Residential Communities. Energy Economics, 85, Article 104567.
[15] Chen, L., et al. (2023) Behavioral Analysis of EV Users Under Time-of-Use Pricing: A Case Study in Shanghai. Renewable Energy, 172, 1203-1212.